The “Harry Potter” author slammed a newly enacted hate-crime law in Scotland in a series of posts on X  in which she referred to transgender women as men.

J.K. Rowling shared a social media thread on Monday, the day a new Scottish hate-crime law took effect, that misgendered several transgender women and appeared to imply trans women have a penchant for sexual predation. On Tuesday, Scottish police announced they would not be investigating the “Harry Potter” author’s remarks as a crime, as some of Rowling’s critics had called for.

“We have received complaints in relation to the social media post,” a spokesperson for Police Scotland said in a statement. “The comments are not assessed to be criminal and no further action will be taken.”

Scotland’s new Hate Crime and Public Order Act criminalizes “stirring up hatred” against people based on their race, religion, disability, sexuality or gender identity.

  • A_Toasty_Strudel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    While I want to agree with the sentiment behind what you said I find it really hard to get behind government legally telling people what they can and can’t say. I personally feel like it’s every skinhead assole’s right to say racist awful shit. I also feel like if you’re going to exercise that right with reckless abandon, you’re gonna get fucked up by some people who don’t take kindly. As detrimental as their regressive views may be, I believe we simply cannot have legal punishments for saying something the government doesn’t agree with. It’s a very slippery slope.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I’m tired of having to do this work and it never ending. Get a law passed and start enforcing. People are being harmed and it shouldn’t be this much work to defend them. Perhaps absolute free speech regulated by individuals was scalable when not every deplorable pos had a worldwide megaphone.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I personally feel like it’s every skinhead assole’s right to say racist awful shit. I also feel like if you’re going to exercise that right with reckless abandon, you’re gonna get fucked up by some people who don’t take kindly.

      Is that what happened in 1930s Germany or the 1950s U.S. South?

      Racism is an implicit call to violence. Suggesting that it can also be solved by violence is not borne out by history.

      • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Racism isn’t an implicit call to violence. Violence is one of the ways it can manifest if it’s deranged enough, but most racism is just sorta quiet and often unconscious.

        It’s not a good idea for the government tell you what you’re allowed to say - that change has to come naturally from the bottom up, not artificially from the top down

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          that change has to come naturally from the bottom up, not artificially from the top down

          Cool, when is that change going to happen? Because from what I’ve seen, there’s still a vast amount of racism in this world.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              You didn’t answer my question.

              You said change has to come naturally from the bottom up in order to stop bigoted attacks. Bigotry has been around for a very long time.

              So… when is that natural change going to happen? Are we talking centuries?

              • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                You’re asking me to predict the future, maybe it doesn’t happen. Maybe 1 lifetime? Maybe 2?

                Who knows, but all we can do in the meantime is continue to actually talk with people caught in the storm.

                If the government tries to force speech, what do you think that will do? Do you think everyone will say “oh ok”, and just quietly live out their lives at home in resentment or in prison for this never to return?

                It’s a bandaid to a problem where we’re just supposed to trust that governments will always use this power correctly

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  So rather than prosecuting people for fomenting violence with racist hate speech right now, everyone should just wait a couple of generations for it to sort itself out unlike it has for thousands of years.

                  That seems both likely and reasonable and such a concept could definitely could only come from someone who has been the victim of severe racist attacks.

                  • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    You’re forgetting that we have technology that connects most of the world now, even across languages. This definitely changes things.

                    But it sounds like you’d prefer to live under a government like the CCP. That way you don’t have to worry anymore because they’ll take care of everything for you

    • OsaErisXero@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      So you’re saying we should form a mob and fuck her up then, that’s your preferred solution to this problem?