I don’t think people on this sub use it, but it’s great news for us. The worse it gets the likelier people move on.

  • Gallardo994@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    This. Open source apps are generally awful at presenting themselves to a broader audience.

    Even for me, who’s technical enough, an app being FOSS is not enough to even bother checking out. Yes, I’ve said it. Sorry, tinfoils, but I do put features above else. And, want it or not, general public does the same: if the featureset is not clear enough at first glance, and an app doesn’t explicitly provide clarity on what it does and how it is better than competition, most people aren’t even checking it out.

    • atoro@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s an unpopular opinion but I completely agree. I’ve tried Matrix, not only could I not get more than 2% of my community to try it, but it’s horribly unintuitive and limited for server owners. Shut it down after a few months.

      I have a rocket chat server going now, some similar issues, but at least it has more control than Matrix. Still only a fraction of my Discord and Telegram user base has joined, but it’s similar enough that people are at least willing to try.

      FOSS alone is not enough, the wider public doesn’t care, they just want something easy and convenient.

      • jg1i@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Curious, what didn’t you like about Matrix specifically? I’m in the process of evaluating it for my friends. With the Element client, so far it seems pretty dang similar? Space = server, room = channel, there are also access controls. Seems like there’s voice and video chats too.

        • atoro@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Speed was a big thing. Switching channels could take a few seconds to over a minute to load, on good hardware.

          The biggest issue, and a huge glaring oversight imo, is that users can create their own channels, encrypt them, and instance owners have no way to know what goes on in there. Some of the channel names alone were enough to make your skin crawl.

          Oh, and you want to ban somebody? Cool, just ban them individually from every channel, because there is no global instance-wide ban. Moderation is horrendous.

          • ninchuka@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            did you host your own matrix homeserver or use matrix.org? that can change how fast it feels massively and yeah built in moderation tools are pretty much nonexistant https://github.com/the-draupnir-project/Draupnir is the only moderation bot that you can run to ban users from all rooms at once if they break your rules and lets you subscribe to banlists so if a user spams in other rooms that have write access and gets added they’ll be banned from your rooms as well

    • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      We need to fix people. This proprietary shit is dystopian.

      Make the apps pretty, sure, but long term; fix people.

    • zarenki@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      if the featureset is not clear enough at first glance

      My experience as someone who has barely dabbled in Matrix, tried comparing clients, and knows a lot of people who stick to Discord: a lot of Discord users heavily use custom emotes, voice chat, and screen sharing. It’s not even easy to figure out which Matrix clients support each of those features without installing everything and trying it out. There’s a clients comparison on matrix.org that mentions Voip but not stickers or video.

      For stickers alone:

      • Element is widely considered the go-to Matrix client but uses a strange integration system for predefined sticker packs instead of the MSC2545 stickers that more closely resemble what users coming from Discord would want.
      • Cinny seems to have the best support for stickers/emotes but its site doesn’t mention them at all. It supports uploading and managing sticker packs at either a channel or user level, provides a nice picker UI to send any picture from those packs as either a large “sticker” or a small inline “emoji”, and allows using them for reactions.
      • FluffyChat mentions stickers on its site and has the second best sticker support, with all of those except reactions and a graphical sticker picker for inline emoji (need to type them as shortcode).
      • SchildiChat, Nheko, and NeoChat have some sort of limited support for custom stickers/emoji. NeoChat is the only one of those that advertises stickers on its main site. Nheko mentions them in a GitHub readme.

      Being able to freely use custom emotes without paying for a Discord Nitro subscription nor server boosts would be a great selling point but it’s not something most users would be able to figure out before signing up. The limited client support isn’t great; e.g. Fluffy is the only Android client that supports sending custom stickers but some people may dislike the chat bubbles style UI.