• aleph@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    There was a lot more to the success of the civil rights movement than simply blocking traffic.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sit ins, marching in the streets, and other disruptive actions that are comparable were a significant part of it.

      Not being the whole thing doesn’t mean it wasn’t important.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      There’s this weird idea that the civil rights protestors were met with people clapping and cheering and waving American flags. They were not. Those protests were wildly unpopular in their time. It was only later on, after they succeeded in getting some change, that the attitudes and rhetoric around those protests changed.

      • aleph@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I’m well aware. I was specifically talking about the modern tactic of sit-ins in the middle of busy intersections and protestors glueing themselves to the tarmac, and so forth.

        I never called into question political protest in general, even though that’s apparently what people are assuming I said.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Violence is never appropriate unless in self defense. Bystanders don’t deserve to have their lives flipped over in the name of visibility.