.7z seems to be good and I do recommend it to people saying that it’s better than regular zip. Have recently started using opus n webm files more.

I’ve also heard about jxl recently. Would be very nice to see it become popular, as it could reduce the size of my memes n screenshots folders. Faster webpage loading too.

Are there any other file formats that’ll be useful to people, but isn’t getting enough attention?

In the case of apps, Trebleshot seems to be good for android file sharing. I like it’s web sharing option having an upload form. Helps me where I don’t have to ask others to install an app to send me a file locally. Not sure about it’s encryption n security aspects, but I only have used it for local file sharing.

And what about other stuff similar to that, other than file formats or apps?

Recently have started exercising my neck. Not neck bridges and loaded things tho. Only safe n simple movements. Seems to be good, especially after using a monitor for some time. I think it’s not much talked about, maybe because of the fear that people will overdo it?

    • saigot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Mouse without borders is better than every physical kvm I’ve ever used, it’s magic.

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Good luck with JXL. It won’t take off on the web because Google killed it as I recall. But it might be nice for your local collection. 👍

    • LoETR9@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      They can still change idea. Also because Apple and Mozilla have already added support in their browsers, Microsoft is adding it to Windows soon… There is still hope.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s available as a technical preview in Safari, and Mozilla in nightly builds only, according to what I could find. Support in Chrome/-ium was removed December 2022 with no news of any change as far as I could see, so Chromium-based browsers won’t have support, from what I understand. You could use an extension for Chrome to add support, but, as a content provider/site owner, you can’t rely on users and visitors installing that to view your site properly, of course.

        I’m not telling you to lose hope. I still have hope too. But don’t invest time and effort into JXL if you want to serve images online. Not until promises of widespread support from all major parties. At least not on the web. If you plan on sending files to people, then sure.

        All the best to you!

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Convert from folders to labels/tags.

    The folder system was based off of physical folders and cabinets, which has limitations that don’t exist in the digital space. Labels/tagging offers so much more usable metadata.

      • Footnote2669@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        More like paperless service. Instead of having folders, you’d have everything in one place (sure you can put them in folders) and add tags to files. That way a file can have multiple tags, and be searched by those tags, instead of having the file in multiple folders if needed, basically duplicates, which isn’t space efficient.

          • Turun@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Tags allow set operations (union, intersection, etc) that are impossible with a tree based file hierarchy, even when using softlinks.

            For basic usage, sure, you could make a folder for every tag you make and softlink everything into that folder to make it have said tag. But what if you now want all files tagged as “rent” but that are not tagged to your current landlord? You’d have to get the list of files in the “rent” folder and subtract form that list the list of files in the “<current landlord>” folder.

            If you make tags have an order I’d even argue they are strictly superior to a tree hierarchy. Edit: that means that there is not a single operation you can do in a tree hierarchy that you can not do with those ordered tags.

            • Kayana@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              That’s true, but since we’re stuck with the file/folder system for all intents and purposes, you should be able to replicate that behaviour by making those tags part of the filenames (like rent_lease_landlordX.pdf) and searching for (parts of) filenames instead. But yes, a dedicated system would of course be preferable.

              • Turun@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Are we stuck though? IMAP supports folders, but Gmail ignores that and uses tags instead.

                The filename idea is not bad, but you restrict the ability to give your files meaningful names.

                • Kayana@ttrpg.network
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Sorry, I mistakenly assumed you were talking about disk storage - sure, if you’re designing your own solution, definitely use tags! Although the ones Gmail uses aren’t really portable in my experience, so you’re forced to use their mail client. That, however, is pretty much unavoidable if you’re putting a new spin on established protocols like they’re doing - maybe those changes will get picked up by other clients, maybe they won’t, who knows?

    • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Directories are nice because they easily and clearly filter information in a human way and they naturally build a tree that can be parsed quickly by a person.

      I like the desktop metaphor, because it’s how I think.

      • boatswain@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’ve been doing a lot with organizing my data in Obsidian, and I’ve found utility in having both folders and metadata. Using the Dataview plugin makes proper metadata fields really powerful; you basically turn your collection of markdown files into a NoSQL DB. Having a folder structure is handy too though because you can have different metadata templates applied to new files in different folders with the Templater plugin.

        Obviously that is dependent on a fairly specific workflow, but I think it’s worth considering “why not both?”

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Younger generations that have never seen a filing cabinet and are only accustomed to apps on phones don’t really use folder trees. It’s surprising at first when you encounter it.

        It’s like that save icon… no one has seen a floppy disk in decades, it doesnt mean anything to most people.

    • flubba86@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Oh that brings back memories. I used to burn all my HDD backups onto CDs using PAR2 to prevent degredation.

  • bob_lemon@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Markdown (.md) could and should be used for simple, somewhat structured text files. It’s easy enough to learn, and WYSIWYG editors are abundant as well.

    • shameless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I learnt so much about markdown from using Obsidian and I must say for fairly straight forward note taking its amazing, I even love the idea of how images are included into a document. It really does make me question why we believe we need all the extra BS that’s comes in MS word.

  • macabrett[they/them]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Kind of a moot point these days, but I always wished OGG pushed MP3s out of the way. It generally has better audio quality, lower file size, and is an open source format. MP3s had their patent die (I think) and file storage has become less of an issue, but damnit OGG was perfect for the 00s. My plex server is still full of OGGs (I can’t hear the difference with uncompressed, but my hearing is bad).

  • BirdEnjoyer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is a bit more low tech, but you mention technique, and I think people should hand write things more. At least, for first drafts.

    You neurologically process things in a different way when you use your hand in that manner, and the act of transcribing your own work into a computer or device is an incredible editing measure in its own right. It forces commitment and flow, which is so precious in our time of short attention and focus.

    Also, its good to be fluent in both skills, because you never know what could happen to your body. Realizing you haven’t extensively used a pen or pencil much in years is a pretty fucky kinda feeling from a motor dexterity perspective.

    • Chairsareoverrated@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Funny story, I wanted to switch from digital note taking to hand writing but my hand writing was shit. So I worked on improving my letter forms and even started practicing cursive so if someone ever needed to read my work, they could.

      Well, hyper focused a bit too hard and now I do calligraphy. Handwriting hasn’t improved much

      • BirdEnjoyer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Oh, I understand that. My handwriting isn’t great, and I used to do absolutely massive, elaborate drawings, dabbled in asian calligraphy, etc. those skills do not translate.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    .txt is an amazing format that can be opened by an enormous number of file readers and editors. It’s cross-platform and cross-decades.

    Next time you’re distributing something in .docx, consider including a txt file so that people can read it next month too!

  • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I just think Microsoft Word is actively making the entire world less efficient. It’s not made to produce documents that are easy to read. Don’t have an obvious contender though. LibreOffice Writer just tries to be the same shitty product but free, LaTeX is way too technical and has horrible error handling. Markdown usability and quality breaks down if you make any serious use of tables and figures.

    Since I’m not a US citizen I also think it’s a threat to our country that our entire administration and every company is dependent on storing documents in an effectively proprietary format controlled by a US company, on cloud servers controlled by a US company. If compelled by the US government, Microsoft could put all of EU to a halt with the flick of a switch. National security calls for formats as central as this to be open standards supported by multiple competing products.

      • boatswain@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I keep taking about wanting to use markdown files for contacts and policies at work, stored in reports repos for change tracking. The problem is always “the legal team isn’t going to use Git”. What I’d love to see is a front end for Git that allows direct markdown editing and emulates the Track Changes feature in Word.

    • Kcg@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Couldn’t agree more. Tried OnlyOffice? Lovely suite . Markdown is amazing, I am writing a web book & PDF version with the same source. Did LaTeX, but it was just so cumbersome.

      • geoma@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Onlyoffice works with microsoft ooxml standards by default, in other words, promoting them and encouraging its use. OOXML is everything but efficient. OpenDocument, instead, which is used by LibreOffice by default, is the open and efficient standard.

      • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Sorry, I can see from the first screenshot on their web site that OnlyOffice is not conducive to legibility. A user interface that promotes direct control of the typeface (instead of styling rules based on semantic tags) is going to produce inconsistent documents.

        User interfaces should be designed to make it easy to do things right, and difficult to do things wrong. This UI encourages people to produce crap.

        Their other screenshots further show that they do not care about things like appropriate margin size or inter-word spacing, leaving me with little trust in the product.

        • A Phlaming Phoenix@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Agreed. This UI is very much inherited from ancient word processing applications. The shift that Microsoft made in the Vista era to the tabbed menu buttons only added extra mouse clicks to get to the same set of functions. Word and LibreOffice both allow you to do the kind of thing you’re talking about, but those features are nestled way down into menus and trays that are ugly and hard to use and promote the use of the wrong tool since the wrong tool is made more accessible.

  • ShadowCat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    compact.exe, it’s a built-in tool in windows for compressing executables. there’s an open source GUI too, very useful for compressing games and the compression is “transparent” so you can still play the games after compressing. there’s more info on the page I linked

      • ShadowCat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t really know the details but afaik it uses new algorithms introduced in windows 10 and there is virtually no overhead.

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Open source file formats in general. I’ve personally known friends who have lost access to their old works because it was using some proprietary file format that only one abandoned proprietary software they don’t have access to anymore can read.

    • Achyu@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Indeed. Any specific file formats that you would recommend?
      If the list would be too long, maybe only the ones that are commonly overlooked?

  • Coasting0942@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    AV1 for video. Just running my video files through it gets the same quality at 1/10th the size. Thought I was having a stroke.

      • Supermariofan67@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ratios that extreme would probably only be seen in cases where the source video was really poorly compressed anyway, which is what the commenter probably experienced. I’ve had that happen before too. Expect more like half the size compared to H264, which is still pretty good

    • Achyu@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Cool. How much time does it take for encoding?
      Which container do you generally prefer? mp4 or webm? Is there any remarkable benefit in choosing one over the other?

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It depends if you have modern enough hardware to contain an AV1 hardware encoder (pretty much just current enthusiast stuff).

        AV1 typically ends up in an MKV or WebM container (btw WebM is just a kind of MKV with less features intended for web use).

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      AV1 is terrible as far as compression speeds go. H265 is far superior, is 2-3% within AV1 size, and is only half as slow as H264 compression. AV1 encoding is over 10x slower than H265. AV1 is not built for us, but for megacorps with 6 figure machines.