• LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The United Nations Security Council has failed to pass a resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza as part of a hostage deal after Russia and China, who are permanent members, voted against the measure proposed by the United States.

    It’s literally the first paragraph of the article.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        They’re not the same: which horse does either Russia or China have in the race?

        US vetoed resolutions that were unfair to Israel or simply that Israel wouldn’t accept. You may not like this support of Israel but it it’s there

        Russia and China do not have an interest in either side. They do not strongly support either. They do not care about either, and they certainly do not care about human rights. This is just to say “ha ha, US didn’t get this done”, and so patsies online can say “derp, both same”

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Unfair to israel? We really shouldn’t care about israel’s feelings when they’re committing outright genocide. You may not like the idea of the US being as bad as China or Russia, but in this case the US is actually worse since it’s actively supporting and funding this genocide. Throwing together a different resolution that gives israel leeway to continue their genocide but slightly altered is just to say “look, we tried” and so patsies online can say “derp, US are the good guys”

        • hark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I was explaining how they’re the same. You know, for someone who likes explaining the obvious, you really did miss out on this obvious point being made, twice.

          • jumjummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            So because the US vetoed a measure earlier, them proposing a ceasefire now is grounds for Russia/China to veto?

            You sound like someone who thinks “no u” is a strong argument.

            • metaldream@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              They vetoing it because the US proposed a conditional ceasefire while Russia and China want an immediate unconditional ceasefire.

            • hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Did you reply to the wrong post? I was explaining how the US could be seen as the same as China and Russia on this issue because they’re taking turns vetoing each other’s resolutions. The original post was talking about Biden. I didn’t say anything about anyone having grounds to veto. It’d help to follow along the conversation before jumping into the middle of it.

      • LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Biden, through the US delegation, proposed this resolution, which Putin and Xi, through their delegations, vetoed. They’re literally on opposite sides of the issue.