Whoa! Everyone come look! I found someone who believes that outcomes from courts are rationally connected to historical intent and can’t be wiggled through with modern anti-logic funded by thinktank-generated-idealogues.

Damn, you’re like a shiny Pokémon. So rare!

If the last few years have taught me anything, its that money and time can yield judges who will say or do anything the donors want.

I guess the fatal pinhole in my comment is that liberal judges aren’t produced via a billionaire’s money treadmill and so we don’t end up with anti-logical rulings from that side of the court. Don’t get me wrong, that would be a bad thing and I don’t wish for liberal judges to do this, but conservative judges will and actively are doing these things.

To the respondee, I made a light joke at your expense but intend no insult, only humor is intended. There is nothing fundamentally wrong with your comment besides that it naïvely assumes good faith actions from the court. The court is clearly and demonstrably a compromised institution.