• wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s unfortunate how many replys are missing the good part of this and rather respond with criticism and negativity. We can do better than that folks. This is a good thing!

  • SuperSynthia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m surprised that open source technology isn’t used at American universities. My local university only has proprietary software which I guess makes sense because of industry standards, but the reality is learning on open source will be more beneficial in the long run.

    • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Why show young bright minds free options when you can get more money from them for the rest of their lives with subscription software

    • rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m not. Universities aren’t place of open or free learning. They’re deeply invested in capitalism and benefit greatly from intellectual property laws. In fact, most universities function largely as state subsidized pipelines that take people without a viable, real world skill set and turn them into people who still don’t have a viable real world skill set, but who do have a piece of paper telling corporations that they’re able and willing to put up with complete bullshit, general mistreatment, and dull, grueling labor for years without incident. Which is good enough for your typical middle-class wage slave and whatever they might want to do.

      • SuperSynthia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        And to think that’s what my fucking taxes are paying for. Anticompetitive lock in baked into a churn and burn the proletariat pie

    • Kindness@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Most proprietary companies will give very steep discounts or even free licenses to schools and universities. If you introduce an entire generation of students to your software, students will gravitate toward what they’re familiar with when they enter the “real world”.

    • LalSalaamComrade@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Gen-Z Indian here. It’s for school kids, and they’re going to be drawing gibberish anyway. Attendance is how they grade. Back then, we used to play around with Paint on Windows XP. Good thing they’re getting exposure to open-source early.

    • Rogers@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Take 2 people that have not used gimp or krita. Ask them to daw a circle, and see which software they are able to do it in.

      Gimp is a ux nightmare (or at least it used to be i haven’t used ot in years) I will try gimp 3 when it comes out in 2037

      • RayOfSunlight@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Honestly i don’t see the problem, i’ve been using GIMp since around 2013 or 2015, i never had issues with the UI

    • lea@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      As someone coming from Photoshop it’s really hard to get into Gimp with it missing the layer effects you’d expect, which you all have in Krita.

  • voxel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Our textbooks (in Ukraine) used to include stuff on both windows and linux (specifically, linux mint with cinnamon), and included a chapter on libreoffice/openoffice

  • MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Open Source, in the USA at least, is a result of software developers not being protected to unionize under the NLRB.

    Status, seniority, and respect are thus retrieved from the returns on self-employed slave labor.

    • yiliu@informis.land
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      As a software dev and open source contributor: stay the course, then! I’ll take open source software over a union 10 times out of 10. I get paid so well for what I do that it’s silly, and I love spending my time doing the stuff I like. I’ve been a union member in other fields, it’s not an experience I’d like to repeat.

      I seriously doubt anybody is contributing to open source for status & seniority. Respect, maybe. The status & seniority people become managers; as the old joke goes, that’s the best way to get them out of the workforce.

  • qevlarr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I will never get over people using software as a countable noun. You mean a software program or a software application, not a software

    • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      “They downvoted him because he spoke the truth.”

      One fish, two fish. Red fish, blue fish.

      One software, two softwares. One literature, two literatures. One Lego, two Legos. One butter, two butters. One snow, two snows.

  • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Very strange presentation of Krita, but I’ll take it. The overview of what you’ll be able to do doesn’t actually list anything you can do, and the comic recommends using it to deblur photographs, which is definitely not something I would recommend Krita for.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Or indeed something that is really possible with anything. If it’s blurry it’s broken. Learn your camera settings and take another.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Yeah, I’ll wager computer generated blur is easier to undo than real physics generated blur.

          There was that Canadian a few years ago who used a swirly blur on a picture of him raping kids, and the German police reversed it and had him locked up.

          • DoYouNot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            I mean, you’re not wrong - but it’s a technique used every day for super-resolution microscopy.

  • M68040 [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Oh hey, I had some good results with Krita when I was still making digital art way back when. It’s been like a decade. I should get myself a new tablet.