• edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    After a bit of light reading and asking people who know more about philosophy than me, it seems I lean to absurdism. My take is that there is no reason for the existence of the universe or the evolution of humans. It was merely a series of random events that happened to end up the way it is. So it is what is is, I don’t let myself be bothered by it.

    But that doesn’t mean life has no meaning per se. I’m already here, so I might as well make the most of it and live my life to the fullest. Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but that puts me in the category of absurdism, rather than existential nihilism.

  • DontNoodles@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s been many years since I read it but the ‘explanation’ in Lee Smolin’s ‘The Life of the Cosmos’ sounds the most convincing to me.

    I’m the book, as far as I understood it, he suggests that theory of evolution applies on the biggest scales too. New universes form when a black hole collapses. Our Universe is just one of the universes that all have slightly changed values of the universal constants, like the way evolution works. There are many universal or physical constants in science, some of the most widely recognized being the speed of light in vacuum c, the gravitational constant G, the Planck constant h, the electric constant ε0, and the elementary charge e.

    There is a very narrow range of these constants where ‘normal stuff’ of the universe like formation of matter can happen and heat death of the universe can be avoided. We just happen to be in the right universe with the perfectly balanced constants, in the right corner of it, at optimal distance to an optimally sized star, tilted at an optimal angle, with a moon at the right distance to help evolve life capable of developing a fediverse where we can mull this over.

    Evolution, nothing special about it.

    • Delta_V@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      a black hole

      assuming a thing into existence isn’t a satisfying answer

      where did your black hole come from? another black hole?

      might as well just claim its turtles all the way down

    • themusicman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      People are downvoting this, despite it being a perfectly good response to the question posed.

      Don’t get me wrong, religion is all bullshit and lies, but to a christian, god is the correct answer

      • TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It’s not the answer, it’s how the answer is presented. You cannot give an objective answer to a subjective question and present it as if it is the only clear and logical fact that could have existed in the first place.

  • crudy555@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    ‘The chances of finding out what’s actually going on are so absurdly remote that the only thing to do is to say, “Hang the sense of it,” and keep yourself busy.’ -Douglas Adams

  • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The totality of manifestation, and everything therein, is consciousness itself, the Unicity. All there is is consciousness, not aware of Itself in it’s noumenal subjectivity, but perceived by Itself as phenomenal manifestation in It’s objective expression. … such understanding must comport the realization that there is no individual entity as such. What we think we are is merely an appearance, an insubstantial shadow, whereas what we really and truly are, is consciousness itself, the formless Brahman.

    • Ramesh Balsekar
  • invertedspear@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m in the “we’re living in a simulation” camp. I just think it’s mostly unattended. Every once in a while the being running the simulation comes back and pokes at the console or upgrades their computer and we have some innovation. The invention of fire, agriculture, the Renaissance, space race, etc.

    It explains why we keep thinking we find the building blocks of the universe, then discover something smaller (gpu upgrade). Or why there’s a universal constant speed (cpu clock).

    I just hope the Bering doesn’t get bored and end the program for the last time like I eventually did to my sim city.