My current issue is i see you guys constantly having issues, editing files etc.

Is it not stable?

Can you not set it up and then not have ongoing issues?

  • KarthNemesis@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I had far more issues on windows than I ever have on mint.

    When I had issues on windows, which i would run into multiple times a week, the “fixes” would be hacky, slapped-together nonsense that don’t even make sense on paper. I had to change almost every program manually to run as administrator. Installing old games was a nightmare and didn’t always work properly, even with compatibility modes. New drivers would break stuff. Trying to learn anything new was a rabbit hole that took countless hours and then I only learned the fix for that one specific use-case, and not anything… overarching. System updates were so intrusive, installing crap I didn’t want or removed manually, I disabled them completely. It was slow and boot took forever. Ending system processes via task manager didn’t always work and the system would freeze often when something went wrong. Often uninstalling programs was messy and left shit all over in the system registry and files and you would have to defrag and system clean once it started getting bloated.

    When my windows install finally broke completely just trying to get shit to work the way I wanted, I bailed.

    Transitioning to mint was certainly a learning experience.

    Reorganizing your workflow will always be more upfront work, but I found I took to the changes fairly quickly. I found the file structure the most odd, but I became very used to it and very much prefer it over how hard it is to find stuff spread scattershot in windows files. It had a lot of little quality of life things that I really appreciate, mounting and unmounting external drives felt better, way more stuff worked out of the box, old games were not a nightmare to get working because they’re had longstanding fixes for years that actually make sense. Solutions, in general, make way more sense to me, and I actually get a sense that I understand why they function. My boot time is very fast and I’ve never broken my system (I came close once doing something incredibly stupid and very niche, but I just timeshifted back and voila, fixed.)

    Fixes or changes for preference tend to “stick” for me, like when I swapped to pipewire myself it’s been very smooth sailing. I can pick and choose updates or ignore packages that don’t work. There was an issue with kernels for a while that significantly increased my boot times; I just postponed that update for a few versions until one of the newer ones worked. I find I can get down similar rabbit holes to learn some stuff, but it both feels more like “lasting” solutions (and I learn more about how to do other stuff) as well as just more fun. Documentation is a lot better with users who know what they’re doing instead of the guesswork “well I dunno but this might have worked for me, I tried 20 fixes so it’s probably one of these!” I would run into on windows troubleshooting…

    I think my favourite part of linux is a lot of things I wanted solutions to, for years, usually have at least one person out there with a similar issue that wrote a small program that just does it. Does it well. For free. I spent so much time digging for really basic stuff like a sound equalizer that wasn’t garbage, bloatware, full of trackers, or ransomware! I don’t have to spend hours trying to find a stinkin’ RGB controller that isn’t awful because the choices available are just better! I don’t have to spend weeks comparing and contrasting antivirus-es and hate all of them in the end!

    I find mint extremely stable and have no urge to swap nor return to windows. I find it much more stable for my use-case. I really like it, actually, and I appreciate how a lot of it is set up. Been using it daily for 4 years.

    I loathed windows the entire time I used it, and had been side-eyeing linux for quite a while before committing. I don’t know if I’m a “normal” use-case, probably not. Possibly it is best to take my experience as, “if you keep hitting walls often in windows that frustrate the hell out of you, linux might be a decent choice for you, and might “feel easier.”” Both have their own quirks and own troubleshooting, I just prefer the ones on mint and they make more sense to me. (And take me far less time.)

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is a forum where people seek help. Of course you’re going to see problems here. Nobody posts “hey it’s been several years and I’ve had no problems.”

    Of course linux is stable. It runs like 80% of servers on the Internet.

    • Joe@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Can confirm. I’ve been using Linux for nearly 30 years… I don’t post questions on forums. Bug reports for OSS projects, on the other hand…

      • Thorned_Rose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Also can confirm. Been using Arch, which most people consider requires more fiddling than other distros, for almost 10 years now and have had few issues with it. I’ve had to fix my Windows install more than my Linux.

    • krash@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Only 80%?!? I assume *BSD isn’t counted in that number. I really can’t see people running windows on their servers…

      And to be honest, server stability != display server stability.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Of course linux is stable. It runs like 80% of servers on the Internet.

        I assume *BSD isn’t counted in that number.

        BSD isn’t Linux.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        To be honest I pulled the 80% out of my ass… It was the first reasonable looking number that came up on a quick search.

    • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Hey, it’s been well over a decade, and the largest problem I have is a crippling addiction to distro hopping…

      • Laser@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Personally, I don’t get the appeal of distro hopping. I think it’s nice to try different concepts, but there aren’t that many.

        You basically have the “classic” distributions, like Debian, Suse, Fedora and their derivatives and if you want those split up into the stable and the rolling distributions (Arch, maybe Debian Sid). Then there’s the source-based distributions, most notably Gentoo and derivatives. Declarative distributions, NixOS and GUIX system. And then maybe the newer breed of immutable distributions like Fedora Silverblue.

        To me, the difference between an Arch system and Debian are kind of minimal. Yet I’d always prefer Arch. But why would I hop to OpenSUSE?

        Granted, I always install from the terminal anyways and build my system to my needs, so I usually don’t get the default experience.

          • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’m going to do my best to “wait” for PopOS 24.04 before I hop out again. It seemsbI finally got Endeavour right, with hybrid graphics and all. The only pain was actually how long it took to install Lubre Wolf. Ah, and that the first attempt at installing flatpaks, nothing was showing up after install until I rebooted. But now they work as expected.

  • perishthethought@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Search this community for the many other “Which OS” posts and you’ll find many well explained options for what you seem to be seeking.

  • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    If you pick a well known distribution such as Pop Os or Linux Mint you will have very little issues, and if you have any, you will be able to easily find help since they are very popular, and they are also using Ubuntu as a base, which is the most popular of the popular distros.

    • Diotima@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Vouching for PopOS, which has been my primary OS for years. The only thing I run a Win VM for is the old Forgotten Realms Interactive Atlas & Campaign Cartographer. I suppose I could tinker with Wine, but it tends to be finicky with the latter.

    • Julian@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Can vouch for mint. Have had almost no issues with it, I barely even touch the terminal unless I’m doing development.

      • phanto@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m old. Mint 15 XFCE, I burnt an installed copy onto a thumb drive, and ran into a weird grub glitch. Asked on a Mint forum, and Clem himself (maker of Mint) wrote me a detailed how-to-fix. Warm fuzzy feelings for Mint.

  • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Of course it’s stable.

    Just like with Windows, the more advanced stuff you do, the more advanced problems you’ll have.

    If you just wanna set and forget, avoid arch based and you’re golden.

    • SmoochyPit@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I second this advice. Arch is a rolling-release distribution, so most of its packages are updated to the latest releases as soon as they come out, regardless of whether they’re tested to be stable with other software and hardware configurations.

      I have “ubuntu server” installed on an old computer I use for hosting game servers. That thing is incredibly stable and low-maintenance.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Exactly … If all you’re going to do is go online and maybe write a document once in a while … a simple distro like Mint or PopOS will just work without issue.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is odd phrasing. It sounds like you’re saying mint and pop aren’t capable of more. Same when people call them "good for newbs"n implying that more advanced users flock elsewhere.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Well unless it’s just editing the text file. God forbid you unknowingly enter vim and don’t know how to get out without rebooting.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Thing is, when people say that windows doesn’t break, they mean that it doesn’t break for normal users. I’d be surprised if those know what a command like editor is, to begin with.

        • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          And it totally does break, it’s just that people are familiar with the ways windows breaks, and know how to work around it.

      • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        There was a time when I had to do that. I was a teenager. I had no idea what I was doing. And it was many many years later that I finally learned how to quit it. That pain keeps me away to this day.

        Long live nano, the warm and cuddly text editor.

        • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          … It didn’t occur to you to google “how to exit vim”?

          It’s :q! and if you were in some special mode you can spam esc a bunch of times before.

            • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              I’m not sure of you are trying to be funny, but just in case you are not, if their only working environment was a terminal and they didn’t know how to get out of vim, they were fucked to begin with.

              I’m guessing they entered vim because they copied it from somewhere, be it another window, having vim in a terminal emulator, a mobile phone where they searched whatever, or another PC. If we are talking about a non graphical PC with just a single tty or a user without the knowledge of changing ttys or without the knowledge of searching the web from the command line, who somehow entered vim without external input, that’s kinda on them, idk. There’s several fuckup steps in there, all nicely stacked.

              • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                <This is an auto-reply. The user you are trying to reach is currently using vim and therefore unable to respond. If you’d like to leave them a message, please respond to this comment with the content of the comment that this response is responding to. This is not a joke. Thank you.>

        • Cave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m imagining that same instance still stuck open for years until you found out.

          • phanto@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            To quit vim is simple!

            Just get a second computer, network with the first one, SSH into the first one, find the process ID of vim, and pkill! Easy as pie!

  • phanto@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    One of my favorite things about Linux is this: you can try it. Get a thumb drive, get Rufus or Etcher. Download Mint, Ubuntu, something with a “Live Linux”. Boot from the thumb drive, spend an hour or two surfing, clicking around, seeing if things work. 2018, you had like an 80% chance of a flawless experience. 2024, it’s way higher! Plus, the alternatives have gotten slower, more bloated, more interested in monetizing you than serving you, so even if it feels strange, and you have to relearn some stuff, more than ever, it might be worth it.

    Even if it didn’t work quite right, keep the thumb drive around. The number of times I’ve rescued an important file off of a messed up system using a thumb drive with Mint on it? You’d be surprised.

    • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Just want to mention Ventoy here. Able to boot from one thumb drive into a selection of distros? Yes please.

        • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Some older PCs are cranky and won’t boot it. Some newer PCs refused as well, to ‘protect’ me from a shim.

      • phanto@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Agreed! That’s a couple steps after you convert into a full-blown LiNerd, but I have a Ventoy nestled next to my portable Mint. I landed on Ventoy after I snagged an IODD-2541 and decided that someone had to have implemented the concept in software.

  • 0xtero@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Just go ahead and try. You don’t really need our permission to do that. Most distros support “live install” direct from the installation media, without making changes to your system. If you don’t like it, reboot and you’re back to whatever you had before

    Have fun!

    And to answer your questions, yes and yes.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      You don’t really need our permission to do that.

      User is not in the Install_Linuxers file. This incident will be reported.

  • Dagamant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Most problems I run into with Linux are caused by me doing weird things. Linux doesn’t prevent you from messing with things you don’t understand but if you just want to use it as a standard desktop then you shouldn’t have many issues aside from finding replacement applications for things you are used to using.

    If you decide to start tinkering, just keep a backup of your home directory since it contains all your settings and files.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s as stable as you want it to be. I break my system a lot more than expected because I’m deleted directories and files I’m not supposed to. Experimenting with a bunch of stuff. My laptop is using the same distro (Arch) and I don’t do weird stuff with it so it runs perfectly fine.

  • femboy_bird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    There’s a common joke that it’s not linux, it’s gnu linux and this is followed by a long copy pasta about how linux is only the kernel which is the code that handles managing how your machine is used

    In this case this is important, linux can be a stable os (notible examples include android os, linux mint, debian stable, as well as the server distributions) these generally update slower in order to make sure bugs get squashed. On the other hand there are linux operating systems that are difficult to use for a beginner such as arch, void, and gentoo. There are also distrobutions that have a bad habit of breaking manjaro, gentoo, come to mind. If you want a linux experience that is set it up once and have no more problems than anyone might expect to have on windows you can do that (sometimes you’ll run into a situation where you have a device that doesn’t play well with linux like an algato streamdeck or a device that doesn’t have a driver yet like my sister’s laptop webcam (thanks acer much appreciated) but in general you can have a stable easy experience as long as you aren’t trying to do anything crazy

    Here’s my recommendation, make a linux mint thumbdrive boot off it, play around with it, and test varius hardware you have (ie bluetooth, webcam, that one usb dingle doop that no one else has but you use every day). Maybe don’t install it (or do chances are it’ll be just fine) but boot off it often, and once you’ve learnt the os pretty well, back up everything you care about and install linux mint

    As an, aside i love your username, very clever

  • Capricorn@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The thing is that people use Linux and than find it so good that they try to find problems in order to spend time playing with it. It’s like a hobby, or a game… But you can also use it without making it a hobby. Ubuntu was born for this, but for that I would honestly suggest something like Manjaro

      • Capricorn@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I never tried PopOS, but I would never suggest Ubuntu. Manjaro is easy, updated, there are many people using it, offers large number of software, works well with Nvidia and other propietary drivers (the thing that generates issues for new users, usually). I know people think they had “security” problems, but they always explained what happened, and they just had a bad contract with the CDN service and a misleading error message in pamac, that didn’t impact the security of the user.

        • grill@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          First time I tried switching to linux I went with mint and I had a lot of problems, everything I hated about windows seems to be even worse there. I switched back to windows for a year but last month I gave linux another shot with Manjaro. And I managed to fully switch to linux without any big problems so far. There is a lot to like about it, especially for a linux begginer like myself.

          I am not really qualified to recommend it, but my experience as a noob has been great (gaming with linux native games and windows games, watching movies, customizing things, modding games…)

  • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    As everyone is saying, Linux can be perfectly stable, depending on your distribution.

    The only thing I’d think about is that you could have to tweak a few things to get everything working at the beginning.

    For instance, I had nothing to change to make everything work in Fedora on my Surface Go, but I gad to enable rom fusion in the terminal to get the wifi working on my wife’s MacBook Pro.

    Otherwise, you can just enjoy your Linux distribution as long as you don’t want to do crazy stuff out of the beaten paths.

  • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yes. Install Linux Mint and be done. Just works. A lot of “problems” people have are because they enjoy tinkering and that will sometimes break stuff. Leave it alone and it’ll be very stable.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Depends on what you want to do. For most general uses, Linux is stable af.

    Unlike Windows, Linux doesn’t really try to stop you from doing much when it comes to customization, scripting and tinkering, the only limitations are your abilities and how well you can find proper information on the internet. The more exotic sort of thing you try to do the more likely you may inadvertently break something. That said, have fun with it, try the live distro, then dual booting first, and if you do break something you can easily reinstall, until you’re ready to move fully.

  • Rayspekt@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Linux Mint (I’d recomment Debian edition, LMDE) is basically what you want to try out. I’ve set up a PC with it for my stepfather that hasn’t used Linux at all and he’s happy with it. It’s designed to be as newbie-friendly as possible. You won’t have more issues with it than you’ll already have using Windows.

    Then if you feel unsatisfied with anything about it, you can go looking for other linux distributions (distros) because you have a general idea what’s happening.

    • po-lina-ergi@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      You won’t have more issues with it than you’ll already have using Windows.

      You absolutely will, and the ones you get will be harder to solve. It’s far more useable than it used to be, but the overall experience with Windows is still easier.

      BUT it probably is quite usable for you overall. Just don’t go into it expecting nothing but smooth sailing.

      • massive_bereavement@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        IMO and maybe a wrong one, issues tend to happen for four reasons:

        • incompatible hardware
        • hardware failure
        • update breaks everything
        • I wanna do a cool thing from the internet

        I’ll say that the third one is very rarely occurring in Mint, and I wouldn’t say it’s not happening in Windows.

        The first one is in my experience the most common, though less frequent than it was some time ago.

        The last one is the reason you see many posts around here :)