Where would you move to ride out a potential WWIII?

  • lorty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    While Latin America is, overall, a good choice, it’s important to recognize that the mask off fascism we are seeing from the US will only increase the meddling they already do on their “backyard”, so keep that in mind.

    • The@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Was gonna say that.

      It was pretty safe in the last two world wars.

      • lorty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you weren’t living under one of the US sponsored dictatorships, sure.

          • lorty@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Costa Rica, Panama, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, Venezuela, Peru, Chile, Paraguay, Uruguay and Brazil and probably more I’ve failed to remember.

            • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              That’s was after WWII, during WWII Latin America was a “safe” heaven

              • lorty@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I suppose if your only concern is whether a bomb is going to drop on you, you are correct. But maybe you should consider if being kidnapped, tortured and killed without your family ever knowing what actually happened to you is “safe”

  • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve got a bug out zone extremely close to a bordering country that’s self sufficient. Staying put unless things get wildly out of hand. We could probably house another 2 families if needed.

  • seeigel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    London. Thanks to the artefacts in the British Museum, nobody will dare to throw bombs there.

  • 𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Marquesas islands. They are very large, no dangers, lot of hideouts, lot of food resources, innaccessible for wheel vehicles, almost impossible to build large bases and to urbanise (small interest for China), they are isolated from other archipelagos, and the islands have not even 10k inhabitants in total (14 islands) so no one would get interest in nuking here.

  • PopeyesBiscuit@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Think my home country Suriname is pretty safe. Almost no one knows it exists and there’s plenty of places to ride out instability

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Vietnam. Decent enough government and standard of living, and they whooped America’s ass so bad that it’d be political suicide to go back there. I mean, what kind of timeline would we have to be on for someone to be stupid enough to… hmm.

    Considering that fucking Greenland is caught up in it now, idk that anywhere is safe.

  • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Chatham Islands ?

    I chose Tasmania, am here now… I dont think anywhere is but i am hoping it’s lesser and i am not the literal tip of the spear.

    Albiet the poulation is older, white, conservative, religious so there is that problem.

  • OpenStars@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Bold to presume that we would want to survive it.

    Fwiw Musk says that he wants to leave Earth and go to Mars, which is great news for the rest of us:-).

    • seeigel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not. The story about mars allowed Musk to build the rockets to launch the StarLink satellites.

      Given the preparation for war with China, can we exclude that those satellites carry payloads to take down intercontinental missiles?

      Otherwise the USA could feel safe and be willing to engage in a nuclear war.