• KingBoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The 2022 and 2023 usage data was gathered through a national telephone survey of about 1,500 people aged 12 and older—further details and methodology for the 2024 usage data will be released on March 28, according to Edison.

    What an interesting choice for collection method when you’re assessing a social media website in 2024.

  • yojimbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Well If you take in account how hard has “The Chief Xit” tried to destroy Twitter and piss off anyone using it, this is actually unexpectadly good result! More Powah to the Man Child 😂 . Also - there is no longer the $1 payment for account creation - I guess bot traffic is better than no traffic 😂.

  • Minotaur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    You’re telling me the company that once had ads for T-Mobile and Volkswagen and now almost exclusively has ads where random bots with NFT photos advertise ChatGPT ‘services’ isn’t doing well financially??

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s important to note that “doing well financially” isn’t just revenue and user count, it’s also expenditures. If Twitter has managed to cut costs by more than whatever its income has dropped by then that could well be a good outcome for it, I’ve heard it wasn’t profitable when Musk took it over.

      It’s kind of ironic how big companies are frequently criticized for fixating on “endless growth” and “line goes up”, and then when a company or organization sheds that it also looks bad.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        There’s so much wrong with your understanding here…so I’ll just point out that you’re talking about Twitter as if it’s still a public company, it’s not.

        Also, Twitter was never profitable, and it was likely never going to be profitable. But there’s a big difference between their losses and profit projections before Musk, and after.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          But there’s a big difference between their losses and projections before Musk, and after.

          Which are?

      • dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Twitter has 1.3 Billion / in interest payments alone as it took on $13,000,000,000 in debt for the honor of being bought out by Elon Musk.

        The owners of that debt have been quaking in their boots all last year. As Bankruptcy proceedings would make them the new owner of Twitter.

        Note that Twitter made $5 Billion on its best year, and that’s likely halfed or worse.

      • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I thought Twitter’s infrastructure was going to collapse within weeks after Musk made all those cuts and changes. I was obviously wrong because Twitter’s infrastructure didn’t collapse. I’m not speaking to the user experience on Twitter but from a purely infrastructure perspective, Musk was right and I was wrong.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Uh-oh, you said something positive about Musk. I only said “maybe he’s not as bad as it seems” and look where that got me.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        If “lines goes up” meant things get better for the customers, the employees, and the world in general, then people would be cheering it on. Usually it means it gets worse for at LEAST one of the three, and sometimes all 3.

        Here, “line goes down” is following Twitter getting worse for the customers, the users, the employees, and the world in general. So people will cheer as it crashes.

  • udon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The whole Musk takeover is much less relevant (in the sense of interesting) for people outside the western context. I asked a few friends in Japan why they still use Twitter, but they just don’t care about the platform and ownership as long as they can still interact with their friends there. Curious how the botification will affect that over time, though.

    • m13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m sure a lot of the original population has dropped by a lot more than that, but in numbers they would have been replaced by an influx of fascists and bots.

      • ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m taking note of all the prominent individuals and organizations which chose to remain on the fascist platform and thus implicitly support it.

      • dragontamer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        This article is a survey of Americans, not a computerized search.

        Unless a number of bots answered the telephone survey, I think the stats here are legit.

  • yojimbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Well If you take in account how hard has “The Chief Xit” tried to destroy Twitter and piss off anyone using it, this is actually unexpectadly good result! More Powah to the Man Child 😂 . Also - there is no longer the $1 payment for account creation - I guess bot traffic is better than no traffic 😂.

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Wasn’t like one of his focuses going to be getting rid of bots? Did they just not do anything and the bots just invaded or did the bots just get better?

      • WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think the focus on bots was primarily used in an attempt to back out of the deal. It was never an issue, especially if it inflated his ego by pumping up his account.

      • Jesusaurus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        He got rid of like 80% of the staff. I doubt he has a functional team who can even tackle the problem.

    • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Any time something gets too big it gets bots. Lemmy will be the same. We will see instances getting un-federated who cannot manage the spam.

      Fuck Elon though

      • psmgx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Any time something gets too big it gets bots

        Dead internet theory, summed up in a sentence

      • GreatDong3000@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        If peoole sets up their own instances with 100% LLM bots how would we even know they are bots to defederate? The AIs are too realistic. Only giveaway would be the ones dumb enough to make accounts post/comment 24/7 with seconds between each comment.

        • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Right now, it’s still possible to realize texts are written by llms, due to style and mistakes, but it can become a serious problem in the near future, and we are kind of ignoring it, because no one is preparing in any way.

        • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I imagine the content would be bad, which is the whole reason an instance would become defederated.

    • Hypx@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I suspect even more than 30%, and by a lot. Nearly all of the communities that once thrived seem to be dead. It feels very empty.

  • recapitated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I deleted my account and haven’t missed it at all. Then again I was never good at making use of Twitter, it’s too hectic and disorganized for me, and I have the same problem with mastodon.

    • evatronic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m glad I’m not the only person that doesn’t really understand the whole Thing behind Twitter / Mastodon feed thing.

  • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Good, but not good enough. It needs to be 0. And if you’re still on that shithole of a propaganda spreading platform- you’re supporting it.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Quite a few Tumblr refugees still I’d imagine. Shame mastodon and Lemmy weren’t ready yet back then.

        Also twitter is still one of the biggest platforms for sharing art in general, if you want the large audience, you kinda have to be there.