• QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    As a fellow programmer: what kind of doomer take is this? I don’t have any opinion on the efficacy of blockchain technology, but all of us put an immeasurable amount of trust in software every single day. And it’s not like current banking practices are different in this regard, either: blockchain tech requires faith in the software implementation, while contemporary banking requires faith in banks and the software they use (including a borderline unmaintainable COBOL stack, from what I’ve heard).

    • nom345@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Banks and firms that uses their services are audited thoug. It is not blind trust. And regadress the tech used there would sitll be audits.

      • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Agreed, audits are beneficial in virtually every situation. I just think that, of all the well-formed arguments to be made against cryptocurrencies (especially PoW coins), the fact that it is software isn’t one of them. In my opinion, fueling distrust of software in general is ill-advised.

    • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      because problems in the bank’s software are the bank’s responsibility. If they lose my money, it’s their responsibility to get it back. Cryptocurrencies are the exact opposite, by design. If you’re fucked, you’ee fucked. unless of course half the participants decide to fork, half don’t and you end up with two “currencies” out of thin air.