• twistypencil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I know what you are saying, but I don’t agree. I’d take one more year with my dog over no more years any day. Breeding all kinds of crazy types of dogs, but never for a longer life is nuts.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Would one more year really have been long enough though?

      Longer would be better, sure, but would you have ever gotten to a point where you would have been okay to lose that dog?

      • twistypencil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s not about how much is enough, that is a weird way to think about it. Would I have liked to have another year with him? Absolutely, he died too early.

      • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yes, it would have been better. A longer healthier life for a dog, who says you have to get to that point? Maybe we will bring a whole new meaning to the word family dog, passed down generations.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I didn’t ask if it would be better.

          Of course it would be better.

          Would it be long enough? I doubt it. At least I know that no matter how many years any of my dogs lived, even if it was 50 years, if I outlived, them it wouldn’t be long enough.

          Long enough means you would be okay if they died.