With McConnell’s endorsement of Trump, it gives the green light to other remaining skeptical Republicans — and the deep-pocketed donors who fuel campaigns — to fall in line despite any reservations they may have about a return to the Trump era.
After the Jan. 6 attack of the Capitol, McConnell issued a grave rebuke of Trump’s behavior, blaming the defeated president for spreading “wild” claims of a stolen election.
While McConnell refused to convict Trump in the Senate trial on House impeachment charges of inciting the insurrection at the Capitol, which could have left him ineligible to serve again as president, he warned that Trump was not immune from civil or criminal prosecution once he left the White House.
After a little thought, this doesn’t surprise me at all.
Name me ONE other Republican candidate that’s actually gotten a decent number of articles about them in national newspapers. They’ve run into the exact same problem as the Tories: They’ve kicked anyone who’s actually a competent and charismatic public servant out of the party, because said people were getting in the way of their ability to enact unbelievably stupid racism upon the nation.
And unless you have Trump-level skills at grabbing headlines and becoming a problem that makes itself worse… Well, how the hell are you going to become a relevant force that people are going to vote for, when you have no charisma, no skills, and no ability to compete with Trump for headlines? Even that Florida governor who manged to stay in the news for a few months for his racism couldn’t keep up with Trump’s unending torrent of bullshit and new stories for long, and if you can’t keep up, I can’t imagine republican voters would throw in with you over your competitor.
McConnel is unfortunately making the most competent move he can for someone that wants to cling to power at any cost (especially cost to the american public): Endorsing someone who’ll avoid splitting the vote and actually killing the Republican party.