I understand that modern outer layers are more functional. A leather jacket, for example, can be dressed up or down so as to be worn in a variety of situations. It is also better at keeping you warm.

However, I think capes/cloaks are more aesthetically pleasing garments. It also feels good to have the fabric flowing around you as you walk. But what do you think?

  • s_s@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Wear whatever you want.

    People mostly used to wear cloaks to keep the elements off of them.

    Lots of mud and dirt from horseback riding back then–also rain.

    We’re indoors a lot more now. Most of us don’t work outside and our transportation, mainly automobiles, are protected from the elements.

    As the function became irrelevant, so did the clothing choice.

    • blazeknave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, the function for sure; along with overcoats and any outermost layer. Chivalry maintained men walked on the curb side bc horse shit and piss flowed freely in the gutters and the coat prevented splash. Same for commuter trains and subways. Nasty shit all over before electric.

      A lot of superstition like bad luck putting your hat on the bed came from this. It was dirty, bring it home and you got sick from it. Logical superstition.

      I’ll catch myself feeling superstitious, check myself with science, then realize it’s gross and get my nasty ass outside hat off my bed.

  • LazyBane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    First we’d need to ask what could qualify cloak or cape provide for the modern man that jackets and coats don’t already do while giving the wearer free movement of their arms?

    The cape’s association with wealth and nobility is also hurt by the fact that the upperclasses these days are more interested in appropriating the style of lower class people (I.e. pre-distressed jeans) to try and appear as more down to earth.

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The pre-distressed jeans are such an irritating trend to me. I’d rather see apparel get more durable, rather than making it so that it’s nearly worn out already. For a while there was a trend of making selvedge-edge jeans with 14oz raw denim that you had to spend a month or more breaking in; I’d like to see that trend come back, since those jeans lasted for years of daily use (just, don’t machine wash them!), and you got wear patterns specific to the individual that owns them.

      • waz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The pre-distressed image: I want my clothes to look like I work without personally doing any work.

          • mihnt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not the fifth pocket. These don’t actually have that, they are cargo pants.

            There’s a pocket at the bottom of the right hand front pocket. One on the inside of the pants on the left hand pocket for hiding things.

            There’s a couple other ones, but I don’t use them so much so I forget where they are. There’s 17 pockets on these pants.

  • RainfallSonata@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Women can get away with it. My coworker has a beautiful full-length, wool winter cape she wears just for every-day. I bet men could, too, with a suit on a formal occasion.

    • CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, I have shorter ones for more casual outfits and full length for dressy events. They never seem “costumey” when they go with the overall look. I’m a woman in a metro area though.

    • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I bet men could, too, with a suit on a formal occasion.

      I disagree. I think some men could pull this off, but it would mostly come across as cartoony in most circumstances. Even 3-piece suits are seen as too formal/old-fashioned by people.

      Where I could see cloaks looking fashionable and natural is in milsurp/gorpcore inspired outfits. Something like This cloak is pretty damn interesting and would look just fine On this outfit Or this one

      • RainfallSonata@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m in an urban center where you still see a fair amount of suits downtown during business hours. Honestly, capes or cloaks with the outfits you linked I would just assume were blankets and I’d expect to be asked for change…I mean, I see that already, every day. It’s an “interesting” look alright.

    • greenhorn@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a wool plaid cape I got from a woman’s estate sale but it isn’t necessarily gendered, though as a man I haven’t been brave enough to wear it outside of the house yet except to a Burns supper where I got a lot of compliments. My coworkers are used to seeing me wear it on video throughout winter

  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    100% of the cloaks and capes I’ve seen IRL have been as part of either someone’s weird cosplay or some neckbeard/weeb shit. I think that, a bit like the fedora, they’re just sorta ruined now due to the people who wear them.

    • OpenStars@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wear a Fedora sometimes - AC can get cold and my hair isn’t as thick as it used to be… it just seems easier than converting to Judaism to be able to wear a Yamaka:-P.

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        AC can get cold and my hair isn’t as thick as it used to be… it just seems easier than converting to Judaism to be able to wear a Yamaka:-P.

        I pity Americans who can’t just wear a touque (or as you might call it, a beanie). Honestly it’s the perfect hat for cold weather. Here in Canada, basically everyone wears one for the half of the year where it’s cold enough to warrant a hat. Some people are fancy and wear an Ushanka hat or a Nordic hat in the winter, but 99% just wear a touque.

        • OpenStars@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Indeed I wear a beanie the whole winter, whenever I can get away with it.:-D But in 100 degree weather, it wouldn’t work quite as well…:-P.

          • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah I’d imagine if it’s so hot that water is boiling you probably can’t wear a hat comfortably

            • OpenStars@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Hehehe, Oh Canada… :-) Don’t you know that you are using the correct “wrong” temperature system - the only sensible one is based on how many pinkies were on the toe of the king’s son’s aunt’s cousin’s horse 200 years ago. I am sure you will agree with me that nothing else makes close to that degree of common sense - on THAT much at least we are SURE to agree! 🙃

      • fjordbasa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        No googling or anything, huh? Just throwing “yamaka” out there and hoping it was right?

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But since you’re a lemmy user you probably fall into that bracket anyway

      • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can’t really pull off a fedora (or similar) without a suit that matches, otherwise, yeah, you just look like a neckbeard or maybe a Michael Jackson cosplayer. If you aren’t dressing in formal attire, consider a baseball cap, beanie, hood, cabbie hat, or even a stetson if it’s up your alley.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just out of curiosity because I see signs for it all the time, we went to Boot City yesterday.

            The first thing you see when you go through the door as the overpowering smell of leather hits you is a massive row of cowboy hats that just keeps going and going.

            It was not a pleasant experience overall. This was amusing, however:

            I was hearing Jeff Foxworthy in my head. “If your living room furniture is made of cow horns…”

          • In addition to the usual ubiquitous collection of random baseball caps, I also have a top hat.

            I figure if I’m going to be lumped in with somebody, I’d rather it be the steampunkers than the neckbeards.

          • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Here’s a few that I think are probably more fashionable than a fedora:

            Baseball cap, pork pie hat, knit hat (e.g. skull cap, watch cap, beanie), docker cap, scally cap, newsboy hat, ivy cap, ascot, bucket hat.

            • ripcord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s a great list.

              And almost every one of those is likely to work better for OP, work with more outfits, etc, and have less of a stigma than a fedora.

            • OpenStars@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Just a quick note that in the USA, unless there is a sports logo on it, cap = MAGA hat, sorry, dems the rules.

              cap

              But Breaking Bad hat, now that is a damn fine argument that you made there!? :-P

              it

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ve just morphed. A poncho is basically a cloak that doesn’t open. A long dress coat is basically a cloak with formal buttons.

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        A long dress coat is basically a cloak with formal buttons.

        Also sleeves, which are the main difference anyway

          • gitgud@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            They can kind of get in the way though. Cloaks could give your arms more freedom of movement if you really need it. I could see a resurgence in military and/or trade uses.

    • Perfide@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issue is it has to fit the overall outfit. A fedora can still look really good if you have a well tailored suit to match it, while most of the things that look good with a cloak are, frankly, uncomfortable to wear everyday compared to modern clothing. This is why it’s essentially only done for cosplay and larping nowadays, looking like that is fun every now and then but not so fun that you’d want to go about daily life dressed that way.

  • owen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    LOL! I’m actually in the market for a cloak. Been prowling the 2nd hand stores

  • snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Full length coats are to cloaks as snuggies are to blankets. They cover the same area, but can sit tighter with easier use of arms.

  • Hawke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cars (and seatbelts) are the biggest reason I see. Cloaks:

    • get caught in the door,
    • take up a lot of space,
    • get tangled in seatbelts,
    • limit seatbelt effectiveness by padding the wearer with the excess cloth

    They’re great for pedestrians but not so much for motorists, cyclists, and motorcyclists.

      • Hawke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, as one of the apparent neckbeards/weebs mentioned elsewhere in this thread I’m 100% speaking from experience there.

        I’m thinking I may acquire a nice ruana for when I’m driving…

  • GreyShuck@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The actual reason that we don’t is pretty much because of the invention of sewing machines. Once sewing machines were widespread, making coats became sooo much cheaper than they had been. Coats need a lot of tightly made seams which took time and so made coats very expensive. With sewing machines, making these seams was vastly quicker and more reliable.

    Coats win over cloaks in so many ways because you can do things with your arms without exposing them or your torso to the rain and cold: impossible with a cloak.

    Capes were the short versions - and intended to cover the shoulder and back without seams that might let the rain in, but with the new machine made seams, they were not needed either.

    The really big change was when it became affordable to outfit armies with coats instead of cloaks or capes. At that point all the caché and prestige that was associated with military rank disappeared from cloaks and capes and they were suddenly neither useful not fashionable.

    Nowadays, of course, they are no longer what your unfashionable dad would have worn: they are quite old enough to have regained a certain style.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The other big reason is that the world is cleaner. Capes and cloaks also protect the whole body from mud/dust and can be easily removed. Riding a horse or walking on dirt roads is a lot dirtier than riding in cars or walking on a sidewalk

      • GreyShuck@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The original type of coat that would have been worn when riding was the Great Coat - which did cover the whole body, down to the ankles (and included the front of the body much better than a cloak). Those would have been worn by military officers, particularly.

        Those were fine for riding, but then if you were off your horse and end up in the newly developed trench warfare - starting from around the US civil war onwards - you ended up wading through mud which got caked to the coat. So then they started cutting the coats shorter and they became Trench Coats.

          • GreyShuck@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The “British Warm” was the intermediary as I understand it: a shorter greatcoat favoured by Britsh officers in WW1. The Trenchcoat itself was modeled to fit over, accompany or replace this.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          For a military officers that are practically nobility would have more and different clothing options than the average citizen.

        • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          you ended up wading through mud

          Horse shit. In cities, you waded through horse shit.

          As someone who has done extensive reenactment in period dress, sometimes in towns dedicated to realism that banned cars and relied on horses for travel, you wouldn’t believe how terrible even a dozen carriages and a few dozen private horses can be to your skirts/trousers and shoes. Especially when it rains.

          People sometimes make light of women in the past who changed their outer clothes two or three times a day, but if you were in town, your attire would be absolutely foul after a few hours in the same outer skirt. A long cloak helped immensely to keep your skirts or trousers from soaking up horse sewage.

          Once cars took over, that stopped being a problem, cloaks weren’t as desirable as they obscured fashion, and coats became shorter and more for protection from the weather than from horse shit.

          There was a bit of military influence, but that was more about fashion than functional influence.

          e: clarification

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know someone who wears a cloak cape. They explained this to me how practical it was back 300 years ago that you could wear your nightly blanket.

      I asked them if that was a situation they ran into often while living in Brooklyn. Having to bed down for the night with your cloak.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or just living in New York where it’s cold in the winter. It’s a blanket you wear over your coat. You’re not supposed to wear it as your only piece of outer clothing.