• morphballganon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Release all the inmates that are there on nonviolent drug crimes, so the cost of prisons goes way down?

      But that’s too hard of course.

        • morphballganon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          25 year sentences would not even be considered if rehabilitation was the intention. It is a sign of a sick system when we applaud 25 year sentences. The guy is not going to get better help for his mental illness after year 24 than he will get in the first year.

            • morphballganon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Why is this thread so full of projection? Why do the people here find it so hard to accept that our prison system is broken?

              • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                You really don’t know what that word means, but dagnabbit you’re not going to let that stop you from using it.

                I’ll make it simple. What do you think is an appropriate response to 2nd degree murder?

                • morphballganon@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  The shooter is 65. That means at the end of a 25-year sentence he will be 90. Do you think he’ll still be a danger to the public at 80? 85?

                  I think 15 years would be plenty.

        • ZeroCool@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Absolutely nothing, but I get the impression they think this is a compelling argument.

      • dellish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Taxes get spent on all sorts of stuff you don’t want or need - that’s the purpose of tax, so the country can spend money on things it needs but individuals don’t necessarily want. You might as well complain about tax being spent to build roads you’re never going to drive on, or social services you don’t partake in. It’s all the same pool of money.