Cost, ease of use, speed, other good features, etc.

  • dana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Note that Mullvad no longer allows port forwarding, which can make it harder to torrent effectively

    • Lemmy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Is it really that bad? I haven’t had any issues torrenting stuff with Mullvad, although I usually don’t torrent files above like 20GB

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          The size of the file doesn’t matter. Without port forwarding you won’t be able to use things like private trackers without running the risk of getting banned. There’s no reason to use a VPN without it if your goal is torrenting.

          • Paddzr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I haven’t got any private trackers and I want a cheap setup. The only thing I’m paying for is the vpn.

            Is the difference really that big and worth it?

            • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              I use AirVPN and it’s cheap with port forwarding. Without it, trackers will show you as unconnectable and nobody will be able to download from you unless they’ve set up port forwarding.

      • CalicoJack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It reduces your available peers. You can’t connect to other people with closed ports, one side needs to be open.

        It isn’t a huge deal with popular torrents, but it can cause problems with unpopular/old stuff.