Cost, ease of use, speed, other good features, etc.

    • ShadowCat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      does it still require port forwarding for seeding ? (yeah, I know port forwarding isn’t required for torrenting)

      • onlinepersona@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        As in I2P itself or bittorrent? In order for I2P to access the network it needs to be able to access the internet. If you’re behind a router, that does mean either enabling universal plug and play (UPnP) or manually opening a port for it that forwards traffic to the port on the I2P machine. UPnP is obviously the easiest (if you’re behind a router).

        CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

      • onlinepersona@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        If “mixed mode” is enabled I2P torrents are allowed to also get peers from other sources than the tracker, and connect to regular IPs, not providing any anonymization. This may be useful if the user is not interested in the anonymization of I2P, but still wants to be able to connect to I2P peers

        That’s what the description says.

        CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • 🌘 Umbra Temporis 🌒@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I pay for Proton Unlimited so I use Proton VPN. Getting port forwarding to work on Linux is a bit of a hassle but they have steps on their website. It’s hardly any slower than my internet connection, but that’s because I’m on the paid servers. The free servers are rather slow. They have a graphical client for Windows and Linux.

    Proton Unlimited is €9.99/month. The VPN has a good number of features and you get the whole Proton suite with it and 500GB of storage. You can pay for just the VPN which is cheaper if you don’t want the rest of Proton.

  • shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    It isnt the best one, but its cheap, allows port forwarding and its not sketchy as far as we know

    Air vpn

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s based in the EU, and they’d have to comply with legislations accordingly. I’d never use anything not domiciled in sketchy islands.

    • lemerchand@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve been using it for probably 5+ years and it’s been great. I wish I could port forward to incoming 80 in my server so I could run a site while it’s up, but at the end of the day I can always run a site elsewhere.

      That aside, it’s never gone down on me, the speeds are fast, it auto-connects to the best server available, and they run lots of promos.

      • Lemmy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m wondering, is there any anonymous VPN that supports port forwarding to port 80? I’m thinking about self-hosting a website from my server at home under a VPN.

    • atkion@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      +1 for airvpn. I’ve never had any issues, port forwarding works flawlessly, and you can get some incredible deals if you buy 3 years at a time during a sale.

    • Syakaizin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      You may want to take a look at Italy’s recent changes in legislation around VPNs tl;dr Italy’s government has an anti-piracy measure called Piracy Shield which is a list that needs to be blocked by ISPs, VPN providers etc but is entirely arbitrary with no governance.

      Air has stopped onboarding Italian customers but you may want to consider given they’re based in Italy, if this compromises your use case/opsec

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ll keep saying it.

      When I browse with mullvad I constantly have to verify that I’m not a bot.

      That’s a good sign

      Your account data is about is tangible as a fart in the wind, especially after 30 days. You can pay cash if you want.

      • Ilandar@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        When I browse with mullvad I constantly have to verify that I’m not a bot.

        That’s a good sign

        Isn’t that standard for most VPNs?

        • micka190@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Only if you have the appropriate level of privacy settings enabled (and extensions installed) in your browser. Your IP address actually has very little to do with ID-ing you, since most trackers will use hundreds of different fingerprinting methods to create “shadow accounts” of you using things like your system information, screen resolution, installed locales, etc.

          This doesn’t mean a VPN doesn’t help, though. Just pointing-out that you probably won’t be asked if you’re a bot if you go on Google while logged-in to a Google account, regardless of whether your VPN is on or not.

      • PHLAK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Mullvad got rid of their port forwarding.

        So did IVPN. Use Proton VPN now.

        • ayushnix@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Not only is UPnP a security risk, it’ll work only if a user has an IP that can expose ports. IPv4 addresses are becoming rarer on home networks and CGNAT connections can’t expose ports even if one turns on UPnP.

        • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          UPnP is widely considered to be a significant security risk, just FYI. Because it allows any random device on your network to poke holes in your firewall whenever they want. You should go disable it on your router.

          Plus UPnP doesn’t work in a lot of configurations. CGNAT, for instance, blocks UPnP.

      • Linguist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I forget about port forwarding because I never get to seed because of my abysmal upload speed.

        • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I understand completely. I believe my speed is 175/10, so although the download is great, the upload is rather pitiful. Even with PF, I still get maybe a total upload of anywhere from 500 KiB/s–1 MiB/s according to qBittorrent.

        • randint@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Why does everyone talk about port forwarding when it comes to Mullvad and seeding? When I tried out Mullvad and torrenting last month I was able to seed just fine. Is there something I’m missing?

          • kouichi@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            You can seed, but you’re depending on other people opening their ports to seed and download.

  • Politically Incorrect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I would go for IPVanish, Surfshark or Windscribe… Mullvad it’s a good option too, I would bypass NordVPN.

    I believe Surfshark it’s the cheapest of these options.

  • r1veRRR@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Is a VPN even worth it for that use case? A seedbox won’t cost that much more, esp. if you factor in electricity costs from keeping your machine running. And getting to 1.0 seed ratio is also much easier.

    • paws@cyberpaws.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Do you have an off prem seed box then? Mine is in my home lab but still needs to be routed through a vpn

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      No port forwarding though.

      I really really wish I could use mullvad but I had to switch to air vpn for port forwarding and then later to proton to get higher speeds (Airvpn maxes at roughly 600Mbit/s while proton can handle 2Gbit/s+) and port forwarding.

  • Ilandar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Something cheap with port forwarding. I personally use Proton VPN but that’s because I use my VPN for more than just torrenting.

  • viking@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Astrill. It’s not cheap, but it’s excellent. And works in China and other countries with strong internet blocking capabilities.

  • msmc101@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m using Private Internet Access. It’s fast and pretty lightweight compared to the other choices. Snagged a 2 year plan on sale for like 50 bucks.

    • Cypher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I use PIA as well but I have never seen good upload speeds through them, which is a shame.

    • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I was on PIA, but they were bought by Kape a few years ago. Kape, previously known as Crossrider. Crossrider, known primarily for developing adware and PUPs.

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      In addition to getting acquired by a shady group, Mark Karpeles also works at PIA. I’m all for edemption arc, but that doesn’t mean I’m ok with him in charge of some security product. I dropped them for mullvad.

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Do you really need a VPN? What’s your country / context?

    Are you aware that if you use a good private tracker (one that keeps their torrents private and has a good reputation) and configure your client require encryption for all connections you may not need a VPN?

    • FeatherConstrictor@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I wasn’t. I haven’t torrented in almost a decade and even back then was fairly naive.

      Would you mind lending me a hand understanding how to do that and remain safe?

      • TCB13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Whenever you torrent from public torrent trackers it’s easy for anyone to see what torrents your IP is currently downloading / seeding. There’s even a website for that https://iknowwhatyoudownload.com/

        ISPs and govts may track your torrent downloads on the same way that website does. It essentially boils down to indexing the torrents from those public trackers by listening to the DHT network / PEX exchanges. When you’re on a decent private tracker (and there are some free) they will disable DHT/PEX for their torrents making it so nobody can’t index and they won’t show up on websites like the one above.

        Setting your torrent client to require encryption to all connections it will create an extra protection layer because then the ISP / govt won’t be able to peek into your bittorrent traffic, they’ll only see an encrypted TLS connection like the ones made to any SSL capable website. You may also add a blacklist of known entities that go after pirates so your torrent client won’t ever connect to those.

        If you live outside the US you most likely don’t even need those measures, let alone a VPN. That entire thing about sending letters to people saying they’re downloading torrents is mostly a US thing because in other countries ISPs can’t even legally do it.

        • TerraNova@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I know people in Canada who have gotten letters from their ISP via torrenting.