Per one tech forum this week: “Google has quietly installed an app on all Android devices called ‘Android System SafetyCore’. It claims to be a ‘security’ application, but whilst running in the background, it collects call logs, contacts, location, your microphone, and much more making this application ‘spyware’ and a HUGE privacy concern. It is strongly advised to uninstall this program if you can. To do this, navigate to 'Settings’ > 'Apps’, then delete the application.”

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not on mine, it doesn’t. I don’t use the Play Store. I don’t have Google Play Services. And I don’t have Google Apps installed. And I’m running Lineage OS. So, fuck you Google.

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        “i just needed to pop in here and mention that the terrible/wrong/evil thing in the post doesn’t affect me at all, like it does for you suckers ROFLMFAO…but also: LOL”

          • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I can suffer a little smugness if it brings in to the fold atleast one dude who’s never heard of LineageOS

            • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’ve been considering putting graphene on my pixel for a month or so now, I’m just in tech and have a shit load of MFA entries in multiple apps that don’t sync anywhere, and I don’t have the energy to redo all that shit at work when I barely have enough time to do my normal shit…

              I used to live rooting and throwing custom rooms on my phone, but I’ve been out of that for a decade and don’t have a usable spare device to test/use as a backup.

                • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Aegis is amazing for standard TOTP (6 digit code that changes every 30 minutes), but there are also proprietary OTP that require own apps and usually do not support export and would require to set it up from 0. Microsoft for example have push notifications that I love and prefer over TOTP, but for recovery purposes I have TOTP added in Aegis as well so if I ever loose MS Authenticator data, I will not be locked out.

              • voracitude@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                I understand, I was in exactly the same position. Then my battery swelled and wouldn’t hold a charge at all, so I couldn’t restore anything anyway, and my last backup was inaccessible (I know I know, test your backups, but like I started this post with I’m in the same boat of all work and no time for me).

                Losing everything was remarkably freeing. Just switch all your 2FA to Aegis as has been suggested, and save anything you want to back up over the wire, then take the plunge. You won’t lose everything like I did, and you won’t regret the switch 😊

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve just given it the boot from my phone.

    It doesn’t appear to have been doing anything yet, but whatever.

  • SavageCoconut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Google says that SafetyCore “provides on-device infrastructure for securely and privately performing classification to help users detect unwanted content. Users control SafetyCore, and SafetyCore only classifies specific content when an app requests it through an optionally enabled feature.”

    GrapheneOS — an Android security developer — provides some comfort, that SafetyCore “doesn’t provide client-side scanning used to report things to Google or anyone else. It provides on-device machine learning models usable by applications to classify content as being spam, scams, malware, etc. This allows apps to check content locally without sharing it with a service and mark it with warnings for users.”

    But GrapheneOS also points out that “it’s unfortunate that it’s not open source and released as part of the Android Open Source Project and the models also aren’t open let alone open source… We’d have no problem with having local neural network features for users, but they’d have to be open source.” Which gets to transparency again.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Graphene could easily allow for open source solutions to emulate the SafetyCore interface. Like how it handles Google’s location services.

      There’s plenty of open source libraries and models for running local AI, seems like this is something that could be easily replicated in the FOSS world.

  • zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This is the stupidest shit, moral panic levels of miscomprehension. I mean, I was miffed and promptly removed safetycore because I don’t mind seeing sex organs and don’t want shit using battery for no reason, but wow Forbes.

    Edit: ok, the article is not so bad, just the shitty blurb from some forum reproduced here on Lemmy.

  • Kraiden@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Huh. My device seems to have been skipped? I don’t do anything special, I’m using Play Store and Play Services, and I’m up to date, but it’s not showing up in my settings app list

    • falseprophet@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sometimes it uses a different name I have noticed, try to see if something with a similar is listed

      • reksas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        i havent had it yet either. only suspicious thing that i notice is some android system intelligence, but that has been there for a while now. i havent dared to uninstall/deactivate it yet since i dont know if anything critical is dependent on it. havent even noticed any suspicious network activity either on rethink, beyond the usual bullshit like some uninstalled application still trying to connect to google as “unknown”.

        • falseprophet@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Maybe they experimenting installing it on some phones, I had it but an different name. I couldn’t find it in my apps lists but when someone posted a direct link to play store app page it showed installed.

          • reksas@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            hmm, i looked it up myself and it doesnt seem to say its installed for me there. Cant find it by searching on my phone, only on my pc through search engine. But someone on comments there brought a good point by telling that his some old phone basically bricked because of this due to it being incompitable.

            I also have fairphone, though i’m not sure if that really is the reason. Maybe they are indeed gradually installing it then.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    My question is, does it install as a stand alone app? Or is it part of a Google Play update chunk that you only find out after Play has updated? My system does not auto update (by design) so I’d like to know where it sources from.

    • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I went to it on the Okay Store and uninstalled it. It didn’t commission and so far all phone functionality is working funny. It seems like an addon that’s not tightly bound to core OS components.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The Firefox Phone should’ve been a real contender. I just want a browser in my pocket that takes good pictures and plays podcasts.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        too bad firefox is going through the way like google, they are updating thier privacy terms of usage.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yep. I’m furious at Mozilla right now. But when the Firefox Phone was in development, they were one of the web’s heroes.

          • Ledericas@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            it says its only for LLM? as long as they dont try to expand the “privacy” in any case i download alternatives to the browsers anyways.

      • StefanT@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Unfortunately Mozilla is going the enshittification route more and more. Or good in this case that the Firefox Phone did not take of.

        • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Is there some good Chromium browser with hardware video decoder support and a working adblocker, that is not Brave? Or which Firefox fork is recommended?

    • ad_on_is@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      if there was something that could run android apps virtualized, I’d switch in a heartbeat

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Every one of them can, AFAIK. I have a second cheap used phone I picked up to play with Ubuntu Touch and it has a system called Waydroid for this. Not quite seamless and you’ll want to use native when possible but it does work.

        SailfishOS, PostmarketOS, Mobian, etc all also can use Waydroid or a similar thing

        • scribbler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I gave it a run on Ubuntu touch with a fair phone like 8 months ago… It was still pretty rough then.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I remember reading recently that it’s gotten better (haven’t tried myself so don’t hold me to it). I can say that Wayland in general has come a long way since I switched to Linux ~2 years ago

      • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        There are two solutions for that. One is Waydroid, which is basically what you’re describing. Another is android_translation_layer, which is closer to WINE in that it translates API calls to more native Linux ones, although that project is still in the alpha stages.

        You can try both on desktop Linux if you’d like. Just don’t expect to run apps that require passing SafetyNet, like many banking apps.

        • ad_on_is@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I know about WayDroid, but never heard of ATL.

          So yeah, while we have the fundamentals, we still don’t have an OS that’s stable enough as a daily driver on phones.

          And this isn’t a Linux issue. It’s mostly because of proprietary drivers. GrapheneOS already has the issue that it only works on Pixel phones.

          I can imagine, bringing a Linux only mobile OS to life is even harder. I wish android phones were designed in a way, that there is a driver layer and an OS layer, with standerdized APIs to simply swap the OS layer for any unix-like system.

          • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Halium is basically what you’re talking about. It uses the Android HAL to run Linux.

            The thing is, that also uses the Android kernel, meaning that there will essentially never be a kernel update since the kernel patches by Qualcomm have a ton of technical debt. The people working on porting mainline Linux to SoCs are essentially rewriting everything from scratch.

  • Armand1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    For people who have not read the article:

    Forbes states that there is no indication that this app can or will “phone home”.

    It’s stated use is for other apps to scan an image they have access to find out what kind of thing it is (known as "classification"). For example, to find out if the picture you’ve been sent is a dick-pick so the app can blur it.

    My understanding is that, if this is implemented correctly (a big ‘if’) this can be completely safe.

    Apps requesting classification could be limited to only classifying files that they already have access to. Remember that android has a concept of “scoped storage” nowadays that let you restrict folder access. If this is the case, we’ll it’s no less safe than not having SafetyCore at all. It just saves you space as companies like Signal, WhatsApp etc. no longer need to train and ship their own machine learning models inside their apps, as it becomes a common library / API any app can use.

    It could, of course, if implemented incorrectly, allow apps to snoop without asking for file access. I don’t know enough to say.

    Besides, you think that Google isn’t already scanning for things like CSAM? It’s been confirmed to be done on platforms like Google Photos well before SafetyCore was introduced, though I’ve not seen anything about it being done on devices yet (correct me if I’m wrong).

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Issue is, a certain cult (christian dominionists), with the help of many billionaires (including Muskrat) have installed a fucking dictator in the USA, who are doing their vow to “save every soul on Earth from hell”. If you get a porn ban, it’ll phone not only home, but directly to the FBI’s new “moral police” unit.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is EXACTLY what Apple tried to do with their on-device CSAM detection, it had a ridiculous amount of safeties to protect people’s privacy and still it got shouted down

      I’m interested in seeing what happens when Holy Google, for which most nerds have a blind spot, does the exact same thing

      • Noxy@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        it had a ridiculous amount of safeties to protect people’s privacy

        The hell it did, that shit was gonna snitch on its users to law enforcement.

        • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Nope.

          A human checker would get a reduced quality copy after multiple CSAM matches. No police was to be called if the human checker didn’t verify a positive match

          Your idea of flooding someone with fake matches that are actually cat pics wouldn’t have worked

      • Natanael@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Apple had it report suspected matches, rather than warning locally

        It got canceled because the fuzzy hashing algorithms turned out to be so insecure it’s unfixable (easy to plant false positives)

        • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The official reason they dropped it is because there were security concerns. The more likely reason was the massive outcry that occurs when Apple does these questionable things. Crickets when it’s Google.

          The feature was re-added as a child safety feature called “Comminication Saftey” that is optional on a child accounts that will automatically block nudity sent to children.

        • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          They were not “suspected” they had to be matches to actual CSAM.

          And after that a reduced quality copy was shown to an actual human, not an AI like in Googles case.

          So the false positive would slightly inconvenience a human checker for 15 seconds, not get you Swatted or your account closed

          • Natanael@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Yeah so here’s the next problem - downscaling attacks exists against those algorithms too.

            https://scaling-attacks.net/

            Also, even if those attacks were prevented they’re still going to look through basically your whole album if you trigger the alert

            • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              And you’ll again inconvenience a human slightly as they look at a pixelated copy of a picture of a cat or some noise.

              No cops are called, no accounts closed

              • Natanael@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                The scaling attack specifically can make a photo sent to you look innocent to you and malicious to the reviewer, see the link above

      • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I have 5 kids. I’m almost certain my photo library of 15 years has a few completely innocent pictures where a naked infant/toddler might be present. I do not have the time to search 10,000+ pics for material that could be taken completely out of context and reported to authorities without my knowledge. Plus, I have quite a few “intimate” photos of my wife in there as well.

        I refuse to consent to a corporation searching through my device on the basis of “well just in case”, as the ramifications of false positives can absolutely destroy someone’s life. The unfortunate truth is that “for your security” is a farce, and people who are actually stupid enough to intentionally create that kind of material are gonna find ways to do it regardless of what the law says.

        Scanning everyone’s devices is a gross overreach and, given the way I’ve seen Google and other large corporations handle reports of actually-offensive material (i.e. they do fuck-all), I have serious doubts over the effectiveness of this program.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Overall, I think this needs to be done by a neutral 3rd party. I just have no idea how such a 3rd party could stay neutral. Some with social media content moderation.

    • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Doing the scanning on-device doesn’t mean that the findings cannot be reported further. I don’t want others going thru my private stuff without asking - not even machine learning.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Forbes states that there is no indication that this app can or will “phone home”.

      That doesn’t mean that it doesn’t. If it were open source, we could verify it. As is, it should not be trusted.

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The Graphene devs say it’s a local only service.

          Open source would be better (and I can easily see open source alternatives being made if you’re not locked into a Google Android-based phone), but the idea is sound and I can deny network privileges to the app with Graphene so it doesn’t matter if it does decide to one day try to phone home… so I’ll give it a shot.

          • Armand1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            God I wish I could completely deny internet access to some of my apps on stock android. It’s obvious why they don’t allow it though.

            • xspurnx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Check out Netguard. It’s an app that pretends to be a VPN client so most of your traffic has to go through it - and then you can deny/allow internet access per app. Even works without root.

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Thanks. Uninstalled and reported. Hopefully they’ll get the hint. I love my Android, but this is pushing me towards Graphene/Calyx.

    • hector@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Thanks for the link, this is impressive because this really has all the trait of spyware; apparently it installs without asking for permission ?

      • Moose@moose.best
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yup, heard about it a week or two ago. Found it installed on my Samsung phone, it never asked for permissions or gave any info that it was added to my phone.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        yea i found it as soon as this article said it was on your phone spying on you, ALSO many people, like myself noticed the battery draining pretty fast too, this is probalby the cause, if it installs without your knowledge, i doubt the app is excluded from your "app battery usage logs to, like it doesnt show up how much power its using.

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Thanks. Uninstalled. Not that it matters, they already got what they wanted from me most likely.

  • YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    What about the “Android System Intelligence” app that someone else mentioned here? I just realized I have that one. It sounds like it has the capabilities to spy and maybe even more.

      • YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        What do you mean by that? What I meant is that the functions, capabilities, and permissions it has could enable it to do so.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Yeah, so do the rest of the system apps, and the OS itself. Why is everyone freaking out about this one all of a sudden? If you don’t trust the Google software running on your phone, you shouldn’t be using it in the first place.