Hot off the back of its recent leadership rejig, Mozilla has announced users of Firefox will soon be subject to a ‘Terms of Use’ policy — a first for the iconic open source web browser.

This official Terms of Use will, Mozilla argues, offer users ‘more transparency’ over their ‘rights and permissions’ as they use Firefox to browse the information superhighway — as well well as Mozilla’s “rights” to help them do it, as this excerpt makes clear:

You give Mozilla all rights necessary to operate Firefox, including processing data as we describe in the Firefox Privacy Notice, as well as acting on your behalf to help you navigate the internet.

When you upload or input information through Firefox, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license to use that information to help you navigate, experience, and interact with online content as you indicate with your use of Firefox.

Also about to go into effect is an updated privacy notice (aka privacy policy). This adds a crop of cushy caveats to cover the company’s planned AI chatbot integrations, cloud-based service features, and more ads and sponsored content on Firefox New Tab page.

  • mesamunefire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Man all this makes me want to just use Links2 for everything and being a luddite. Complete with cabin in the woods. So frustrating.

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Good thing LibreWolf and other forks exist, including hard forks like the Goanna browsers.

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      LibreWolf, or if you can tolerate some breakage, PaleMoon or Basilisk (I say ‘if you can tolerate some breakage’ because Goanna is hard-forked from old ESR code, and PaleMoon and Basilisk are both Goanna-based).

    • garretble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      As I understand it, these changes don’t affect browsers that use FF as a base, so Zen Browser might not be affected.

      I’ve been trying it out this week, and it’s good. And can still use all the FF extensions.

      https://zen-browser.app/

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      To add to the list:

      Mullvad browser (pc only) (removes blobs,proprietary crap, telemetry, and is otherwise hardened and was developed in partnership with the tor org. Some prefs are fine to change but you’re best off by leaving as is.

      Tor browser - nuff said. If you want anonymity use this. Don’t change any prefs.

      Arkenfox has a nodded user.is file you can simply drop into your current ff profile dir. It includes many hidden prefs and settings and allows you to customize for your needs/threat model.

      Arkenfox’s mods are used by other privacy friendly browsers. As are some tor mods.

      If you can find your way around about:config and don’t mind some learning, you can achieve most of the results of hardened broswers.

      There are guides to further harden your ff. Search for Hardened Firefox.

  • Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I feel like everything is getting corroded, the capitalists are wearing down everything

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    sometimes bound to give, if firefox isnt taking in money from having no ads, to having ads. they are going to need tons of ads, and the ability to sell your browser info for money, much like chrome is doing. surprised its taken this long to finally say “private donations isnt enough”

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    AI is going to fail, and it can’t happen soon enough. The Mozilla leadership really needs to pay attention to that reality.

  • Viri4thus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Well, we had a good run lads, enshitification is here.

    Any recommendations for open source alternatives that are convenient and also have an android app supporting ublock origin.

    • MoonlightFox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not really open source, but want to mention it anyways. Take a look at the Norwegian browser Vivaldi. I made the switch recently and am really happy with it. Their privacy policy seems good, and they have a clear no AI stance. Their android browser is by far the best android browser from a UX standpoint in my opinion.

      I might be biased as a Norwegian 😉

      • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, I’ll +1 Vivaldi - great tool with (mostly) useful features

        Not sure how it will do with the Chrome / Chromium v3 addon API thingie - just not looked into that at all. Hope it’s not relevant

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Librewolf, Servo looks promising but is very far off and just an engine I think? Idk I keep looking at it and want it.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Servo isn’t a full browser, it’s a tech testbed for Mozilla to test out their various rewritten Rust components. I wish they would have promoted it to full browser status, but I think intention was always to take pieces of Servo as they were completed and drop them into Firefox.

          • orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Hmm seems like it’s only partially true these days. Looking at their webpage they have a screenshot of their Wikipedia entry (why they didn’t just link to it I have no idea) that provides some more up to date info. It was a testbed and they mention a project Quantum where the tech was added into Firefox’s Gecko engine. In 2020 Mozilla laid off all their Servo devs and handed the project over to Linux Foundation Europe. It seems like since then they’ve reenvisioned the project as an embeddable rendering engine similar to WebKit or V8.

            • Sanctus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Oh, well thank you for the info. I guess its a good thing Librewolf already exists.

  • cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Get ready for ads as well

    https://github.com/mozilla/bedrock/commit/d459addab846d8144b61939b7f4310eb80c5470e#commitcomment-153095625

    They removed this:

    
                {
    
                    "@type": "Question",
    
                    "name": "Does Firefox sell your personal data?",
    
                    "acceptedAnswer": {
    
                        "@type": "Answer",
    
                        "text": "Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That’s a promise. "
    
                    }
    
                },
    
    
    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Turns out when you gotta choose between going defunct and selling ad space, selling ad space wins.

      Also turns out that drying up donations for privacy protecting browsers means there is less demand for it, and less money to fund it.

      The majority cost of Firefox is engineering salaries.

      Eventually something has to give, and this is it.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Also turns out that drying up donations for privacy protecting browsers means there is less demand for it

        Or, hear me out, that former donors don’t trust them anymore!

        But also that a lot of people don’t want to donate, basically when they could only donate an immeasurably small amount, to a company whose CEO gets an unimaginably huge pay, that could be used for significantly boosting development.
        Personally that’s a big reason I rather want to support smaller projects, or even that of size like Bitwarden.

    • shortrounddev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Waterfox’s creator, while not being HOSTILE to privacy, has said in the past that making the most private browser in the world is not the goal of the project. The goal is a more customizable browser for power users

    • And009@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I have librewolf, don’t use it much. Is it functionally the same as FF? In terms of plug-in and website compatibility.

      Most consumer sites are optimized for chrome and even safari, firefox & Edge (Obviously) face issues with scripts and plug-ins.

      • cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s basically the same, but the devil is in the detail. DRM disabled from the get go, which is a show stopper for some sites (say, netflix). Some sites will bork themselve on the strange user-agent. Some advanced privacy features are quite hard to disable willingly, which may or may not be a good thing if you actually have to get things done on sites that breaks.

        One would argue that sites that breaks when privacy features are enforced are not worth it, but you don’t always have a choice in that regard.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Most consumer sites are optimized for chrome and even safari, firefox & Edge (Obviously) face issues with scripts and plug-ins.

        This is why it’s dangerous that Chrome has such a large amount of market share. Instead of using standard features, sites are using Chrome-specific features and even relying on Chrome bugs that don’t exist in other browsers. It’s exactly the same reason Internet Explorer was bad.

    • the_q@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ladybird has a platinum sponsorship on their homepage from Shopify so not a good look already.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Building a browser from scratch is going to cost well over a million dollars in development costs. I don’t think they’d be able to achieve it without sponsors.

        • the_q@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m not saying they shouldn’t seek funding, but maybe not from companies that hosted and sold literally Nazi tshirts.

        • the_q@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          What’s that saying about sitting at a table with a Nazi?