Darryl George: Texas judge rules school district can restrict the length of male students’ natural hair | CNN
www.cnn.com
A Texas judge ruled Thursday that the state’s CROWN Act does not make it unlawful for school dress codes to limit a student’s hair length.
  • EatATaco@lemm.eeEnglish
    0·
    1 year ago

    Your argument is splitting hairs over word choice

    You claimed an opinion was a fact and that I was factually wrong for having a different opinion than you. It’s not “splitting hairs” to point out you have no clue what you’re talking about.

    If you recognize that you used the wrong word, say “I apologize, you’re right, I used the wrong term” and then simply rephrase your argument. Stop trying to make it my fault you said something absolutely ridiculous and I called it out

    • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      0·
      1 year ago

      If you recognize that you used the wrong word, say “I apologize, you’re right, I used the wrong term” and then simply rephrase your argument.

      I went back and checked what I wrote in my argument. Now your argument is pretending there is an incorrect statement in my argument.

      These policies are always racist. Your argument misrepresenting my argument will not change this.

      You claimed an opinion was a fact and that I was factually wrong for having a different opinion than you.

      No, what I claimed is a fact. What your argument claims is false. False claims are not opinions.

      It’s not “splitting hairs” to point out you have no clue what you’re talking about. Stop trying to make it my fault you said something absolutely ridiculous and I called it outs

      Ad hominem attacks against me aren’t compelling.

      • EatATaco@lemm.eeEnglish
        0·
        1 year ago

        Now your argument is pretending there is an incorrect statement in my argument.

        No, not pretending. You are confusing fact with opinion. That’s actually a fact.

        Ad hominem attacks against me aren’t compelling.

        And accusing me of “splitting hairs” instead of addressing my actual argument is also an ad hominem. You’re basically undercutting your own position.