octopus_ink@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoFacepalm on multiple levelslemmy.mlimagemessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageFacepalm on multiple levelslemmy.mloctopus_ink@lemmy.ml to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square130fedilink
minus-squareoctopus_ink@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·21 hours agoI think you are bold to assume their plan involved repealing vs ignoring.
minus-squareCyrus Draegur@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·19 hours agoExactly. “they can’t do that that’s illegal” Who’s gonna stop them? The law ain’t doing Jack FUCKING Shit. If there is no group or individual who is both willing and able to inflict consequences, THERE ARE NO CONSEQUENCES
I think you are bold to assume their plan involved repealing vs ignoring.
Exactly.
“they can’t do that that’s illegal”
Who’s gonna stop them? The law ain’t doing Jack FUCKING Shit. If there is no group or individual who is both willing and able to inflict consequences, THERE ARE NO CONSEQUENCES