Upvotes seem to just federate as likes and dislikes.

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I get this is obviously intended behaviour on part of actpub but I’d love for there to be a pseudo-anonymous voting system too. Maybe an option to hash user credentials when added to likes to ensure that they’re unique whilst obfuscating the original user.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Oof, hell no. That’s some Facebook level cancer right there when they removed downvotes.

      It’s just a form of white washing that makes the same people who made up being offended by “black lists” and “master branch”.

  • 𝚝𝚛𝚔@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Who cares? If your upvote or downvote or any other activity you deliberately perform on a public platform is something you’re embarrassed about and wouldn’t be willing to do in a face to face engagement you probably shouldn’t be doing it.

    • irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I agree, and if you absolutely must, then maybe make an alt?

      The main problem is most people assume their votes are private, as they are private on reddit.

  • asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Or you can be an instance admin. In the next lemmy version (1.0.0), mods will also be able to view votes in their communities.

  • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mod a small community with like 6 monthly users, I’m the only one who post or comment and the average post have 3/4 upvotes and 1 downvote. And I always ask myself who is downvoting my submissions, because it’s make no sense to me that someone take the job of pressing the downvote button on a link to a EDM set. Couldn’t they just block the community?

      • Ace T'Ken@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        No, sometimes it is about blocking.

        If you run a small community like several of us do, even a small amount of downvotes can completely shut down a discussion from ever being seen by anyone else. It’s a way of shutting down conversation.

        If someone neither wants to contribute nor lurk, and merely drag down a community, they shouldn’t be part of it.

        • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I understand that if you are exploring on all and so, sometimes some communities you couldn’t care less appear on the feed, it’s happens all the time to me with sports news and related, but I just block them and move on.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        How exactly can I see who downvoted? Can’t seem to find it in the regular view, and the debug info only shows the vote count, not the voter.

        • Ace T'Ken@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I’d also like to know as I’m in the same boat you are. I’m just leaving this comment to remember to look later and see if you got an answer.

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s pretty cool. Sometimes in an argument there’s that (1/-1) thing going on, would be funny to see how both are downvoting each other.

  • coldsideofyourpillow@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    This isn’t just a Frendica thing; you can see this from Mastodon, mbin/kbin, etc. Many people seem to think upvotes and downvotes are private, but the reality is that they’re publicly available information by default in ActivityPub. Lemmy just hides the information on the front-end for “normal” users; If you’re a moderator you can clearly see everything.

    If one wants truly pseudonymous voting, they’re free to try out PieFed. See the announcement post for this feature for more details.

  • fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m not sure about the downvotes part (i failed to recreate this lmao) but you can already view upvotes with mbin. Piefed solves this problem with a option to make your votes private (but from my tests it didn’t work? weird)

    • wjs018@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      IIRC, piefed’s private votes are disabled for “trusted” instances. You can see which instances are trusted here.

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        That is stupid and defeats the point and makes me rethink my decision to support piefed.

        • Rimu@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Bummer.

          It depends what your threat model is. Admins being dickheads about who downvoted what was the main issue at the time so I made it about choosing which admins to trust.

          If future Lemmy versions show votes to mods (not just admins) then Pandora’s box would be well and truly open so we’d need to rethink this.

          • socsa@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah I guess for me I don’t really trust any admins. At the end of the day that’s a permanent database of user activity which could be passed along to anyone, so ideally the minimum threat surface would be that it exists only on the home instance.

            Also, I kind of just don’t get the point of obfuscating for some and not others unless there are some politics going on behind the scenes, which just gives me even more cause for concern. I think this is a killer feature for piefed and really addresses a major concern I have with Lemmy so it is just disheartening to hear that the functionality has been nerfed for seemingly no good reason.

            • Rimu@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I hear ya. There was quite a bit of back-and-forth about it and we ended up with a compromise. It would be good to have more configurability of this to suit different preferences.

              There’s a niche out there for a max-privacy instance. No server logs, no email verification, automatic deletion of old content. And if it was running PieFed, no trusted instances set.

              Not a niche I want to pursue but someone could.

              • socsa@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Do you have a link to any discussions on this? I have browsed local posts on piefed.social but can’t find it. I’d be curious to see more context in support of the trusted instance concept.

                • Rimu@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Check this out for general background discussion https://piefed.social/post/205362. The idea to differentiate by trusted instances was mine and not discussed there. Pretty sure there was some discussion about it in the Matrix channel which is lost to time.

                  During the recent roadmap planning one of the potential units of work was to sort all this out https://piefed.social/post/411591 but it didn’t garner significant interest and didn’t make it through to the final version of the roadmap.

      • fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ah, well that sucks :( i thought it just used a different strategy to do so if it was trusted, not outright disable it.

        Will correct it, thanks

        • jqubed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          IIRC PieFed’s method is to send the upvote using a second random username not connected to your username.

  • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    The whole concept of the Fediverse as social media is that all the data is public. Stop acting like these servers are giving out private data.

    • TacoSocks@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t think everybody knows that and at least here on Lemmy, it doesn’t show it by default like friendica. The fediverse doesn’t necessarily mean that all data has to be public. It’s just that it’s way harder to have a sense of truth without public data.

      • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s not good practice. Really one shouldn’t be assuming anything is private or some entitlement to privacy on a service where all content you post is made publicly available to any and all linked instances. They miss the point of a federated public forum. If one wants privacy, data must be kept locally only. That’s why Lemmy has local-only communities, the “private” community aspect that many people want just won’t be federated, because you can’t make something like this private otherwise.

          • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I know, it’s a really big problem here and on the Fediverse in general because people get so outraged and entitled over something that just is the way things are, this wouldn’t work any other way.

      • smeg@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you’d only ever interacted with Lemmy and not read up on how ActivityPub works then that’s a reasonable assumption, it’s not like anything (that I’ve noticed!) actually tells you that your votes are public, and they don’t look to be public in the places you’re likely to see!

          • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            That’s almost as bad as using robots.txt to claim sites are private and secure and just whining that people/bots should respect it.

            You should assume voter data is fully public and fully open. It otherwise is in the federated ecosystem.

            • flamingos-cant@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              The comparison doesn’t work because both Lemmy and Mbin are implementing the same standard, while robots.txt is mostly an honour system.

              You should assume voter data is fully public and fully open. It otherwise is in the federated ecosystem.

              Information not being private isn’t the same thing as information being public.

              • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Except ActivityPub data is by in large already not private, it is handed out to any tom dick and harry who run a server and have subscribed to actors on this one, and most of the time, it doesn’t even really require extra authorization. That is fundamentally how ActivityPub and federation work, but you can’t have any expectation of privacy in this system when it comes to the content shared. Expecting it to be private because it’s labeled is as dumb as expecting your website not to get scraped because you said so in robots.txt.

                • flamingos-cant@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  I didn’t say it was private, I said it wasn’t public, there’s a difference. If you asked me what number I was thinking of I’d tell you, but that’s not the same thing as the number I’m thinking of being public information. ActivityPub is, at its core, about consent. We have consented to having our data be sent to any person able to serve 200 responses on an inbox endpoint by using instances with open federation. We could, if that makes us uncomfortable, moved to a closed federation system where we only accept request from an allowlisted set of instances, with software that follows the spec’s public addressing system.

              • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Information not being private isn’t the same thing as information being public.

                I’m not sure that is a realistic expectation these days.

                • flamingos-cant@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I didn’t explain what I meant very well. To scrape a website you don’t need to understand robots.txt, implementing robots.txt is something you do to be a good netizen. But to get like info from Lemmy, implementing ActivityPub is a requirement.

                  Now I’ll admit, it’s not a great system and I do wish we had something better, but I also don’t think “this isn’t a good way to communicate preferences” is a good reason to ignore them.

          • smeg@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Oh. If the only thing stopping the votes being public is a label saying pretty please don’t make this public then it does seem very open to abuse.

            • Natanael@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Especially in federated networks where the data isn’t under access control, doubly so if the privacy extension is optional

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    There’s no way that isn’t going to be abused. Some marketing or tracking agency will setup a fediverse server and just collect all data like this for free. Or worse, take advantage of a friendica instance to bombard it with requests for data collection purposes.

    • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      What can they use that data for?

      It would only be usable data if they could show personalized ads to the users. They can’t.

      All they know is that Meldrik up/downvoted this and that, but outside of Lemmy they have no idea who Meldrik is.

      • atro_city@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you think metadata is worthless, I would like to make you aware about Snowden and his revelations. Look them up.

      • smeg@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think the issue is that many Lemmy users will think more carefully about what they comment than what they up/downvote, as a comment appears connected to your username but a vote doesn’t. You might decide against commenting on something you disagree with because you don’t want to get in a fight, instead just downvoting it, but if people then know if was you who downvoted can still pick the fight.

        Basically the issue is you’re revealing a lot more information than you might initially have realised if you’d have known votes were public all along. Maybe a disgruntled person uses that to dox you, or maybe a corpo feeds all that information into their fancy computer system to work out who you might be, who knows.

    • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yes, but as long as you don’t reveal your identity, they can’t do much to track you.

      They don’t have access to your IP.

      Of course, it you’re using the same username over multiple services, or reveal identifying information (which is much easier to analyse now due to AI) they will be able to track you.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well yes, the whole concept of the fediverse is that of social media as a public service. All activitypub data is public.

        • Microw@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          But it has absolutely nothing to do with how it is displayed in Friendica.

            • Zorque@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Tools do not have morality or ethics, only people do. Some people use tools in a morally and/or ethically questionable manner, either for profit or because it amuses them.

              • inbeesee@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                True, we perpetuate the unjust systems around us. Systems can be constructed to unfairly benefit some over others as well, like how capitalism unfairly benefits the wealthy.

            • Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              It’s the age old argument of “It’s not Communism that’s bad, it’s the human element.”

              Speaking as if any system created by humans will ever be free of the human element, which is of course faulty logic.

              • Zorque@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                I mean, when the human element is literally not doing communism, yes, that would be a problem.

                • atro_city@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  That’s the problem: for communism to work, it requires perfect beings that act according to how the system is designed. Humans do not do that.

              • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                , which is of course faulty logic

                …which is why design systems so that when using them we can account for the human element, right? Come on! We have centuries-spanning systems even industries built on that! Engineering, avionics, Yelp reviews…

                • atro_city@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I think you’re forgetting the context of the discussion…

                  Not them but yes but it’s not a feature of the system, it’s a failure of the humans.

                  A system designed to be used by humans has an attribute bound to be exploited by humans and it’s the failure of humans for exploiting it.

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            i think we should be accounting for it if we don’t wanna get swallowed by shitty interests tbh

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is nothing new. Fire up any ActivityPub server and you can see everything over the wire. As a Lemmy admin of my server of just me, I can also see it in the UI.

  • iltg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    this is an icky issue because lemmy sends votes with empty addressing, so remote instances should count them but not show them to anyone. however mastodon (and *key) sends likes with empty addressing too, but considers them public. lemmy is (surprisingly) right here and should request that the rest of fedi respects the protocol and hides stuff based on its addressing. maybe open issues on mastodon and friendica

    also this issue probably exists when seeing lemmy posts on any microblogging instance

    • irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Asumming you meant “do”, go to friendica (friendica.world) and paste the fedilink (press the rainbow button) into the searchbar.