Will you (the community) be setting your username to your public username (a username you use everywhere) or something that’s different from your public username?
Idk why, but signal feels more… personal(?) and I’d hate for general people to stumble across my signal account just by guessing whether my signal username is my public username.
I’d be fine if they got my Discord account, mastodon account, Lemmy account (they’re all different usernames anyway) because they’re public-ish accounts. Signal feels less public and I’d want to go with a username that only I can send to people I know.
It looks like there will be a message requests area and it looks like usernames can also be changed (should a username ever be doxxed).
I’m still on the fence.
For me it will be the same as my “public” online presence, but not the more anonymous ones.
Ah awesome, it’s a shame that you still need the phone number though. I wanted my son to use Signal on my old phone to keep in touch when I’m out and he’s at home, but I’m not signing up for a phone plan for him at his age.
Session, simplex, briar (on Android), there are plenty of alternatives to signal.
in Switzerland, carriers allow you to carry over a number from a prepaid into a plan. Check if you can get him a prepaid now, then move it to a plan.
I wonder if you could use a VOIP number from someone like MySudo for that phone. Or just get a prepaid SIM and you’d have a number that could get the texts for activating Signal.
Hopefully this is the first step towards using an account on multiple devices.
You can already use linked devices
you already can. Desktop and iPad both have official apps from Signal, on android you can use Molly
Sure but you can’t use two android devices
Yes you can. Not with the official App but instead with moll Https//molly.im
Signal was very slow to putting this out icl but at least it’s an option now, which is better than none at all, though sucks you still got to put your number in it though to use it.
Anything better than Telegram (which is has no E2EE via DMs by default) and WhatsApp (which is owned by Facebook) is good step in my eyes despite Signals flaws, cuz we honestly need less big tech controlling our media consumption in our world today.
Yeah although not having a tablet or web client is frankly ridiculous. It’s not 2000 any more, plus their desktop client is already running in a package Chrome anyways.
I see this as both a win and a potential problem for the app’s reputation:
As soon as you take away a hard link to a real-life identifier, the sketchy people come out of the woodwork and trade images/video of child exploitation.
Signal has not had this problem like some platforms (e.g. Kik), and I suspect two reasons:
- Lack of searchable chat rooms
- Concrete link to a phone number that anyone who contacts you must know (and make it easy to identify you to authorities)
Up until now signal has been an excellent secure replacement for text messaging between parties that know each other. I hope they don’t go the “chat groups” route, though I doubt they will. But I suspect this change will make it a preferred way for abusers to exchange images and videos nearly anonymously
How would that even be caught in the first place though? It’s E2E encrypted so nobody can see what you’re posted unless you invite them.
You still require a phone number to register, and your username is associated with that number. It’s just the other people you chat to don’t get your number - but if you reported a child porn distributor to Signal or law enforcement, they would be able to identify the phone number associated with that username.
Careful though. Maybe not as “private” as you may think… a thread from @sc00bz@infosec.exchange - https://infosec.exchange/@sc00bz/111966928032512918
Funny that axolotl is the example name. That’s the name of an independent Signal client for Linux.
IIRC that’s a very old name of the Signal communication protocol
