• AAA@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        So belonging equals supporting and justifies destructive action?

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          So belonging equals supporting and justifies destructive action?

          You mean… like belonging to a people living on land coveted by a white supremacist settler-colonial project justifies destructive action?

          • AAA@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            The answer you were looking for is “no, belonging does not equal supporting”.

              • AAA@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                You know this only works if you posted a question first, which you haven’t, right?

                But I do see a pattern. Everyone who is not in line with your simplistic world view is being accused of being in support of the genocide. Maybe you should learn how to differentiate.

                • masquenox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  You know this only works if you posted a question

                  I felt obliged to ask it for you since not being a genocide apologist seems outside of the realm of possibility for you.

                  learn how to differentiate.

                  There is no center here. If you oppose the only ones willing to lift a finger against genocidal white supremacism it’s perfectly clear which side you are most comfortable on.

                  • AAA@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Correct, it’s outside the realm of possibility. Because I’m not. Your desire to label everything a genocide apologist doesn’t make it true. But apparently that’s outside of your realm of possibility?

                    I oppose senseless violence. Attacking a cargo ship with absolutely no connection to Israel other than being registered by British company is pretty senseless - because it achieves absolutely nothing.

                  • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    If you oppose the only ones willing to lift a finger against genocidal white supremacism it’s perfectly clear which side you are most comfortable on.

                    So, funny story. The British ship was Lebanese operated. Lebanon is opposed to Israel, and has been recently bombed by Israel even. In opposing a British registered ship, the Houthis have lifted a finger against nationals of a country attacked by Israel. They’ve unwittingly supported Israel.

                    Some rich British fucks lost a bunch of money. More Lebanese people lost their lives. Tell me, who have the Houthis done more damage to here? Perhaps they ascribe to the capitalist ideology that property is more important than human lives, and thus their attack was a net success? You seem to have fallen for this same logic.

                    Will you support Lebanon if they take revenge against the Houthis for their people? Or do you only reserve that support if it’s against Israel? There’s a reason why only fools support violence against civilians.