A Texas sheriff's office released bodycam video nearly a week after deputies allegedly shot a woman, mistaking her for an intruder, after she forgot her keys and broke the glass to get into an apartment.
Are you capable or parsing what you actually read?
Let’s try another example since you clearly have a bee in your bonnet over gun rights,
Person A mouths off at Person B who then punches Person A in the face.
You come in carrying on about freedom of speech
This is called an example because you’re clearly too wound up over gun rights, I thought I’d give you another example of a similar situation to see if you’d be capable of taking a step back and looking at something objectively. Thanks for answering that question though.
You’re lying again! And gaslighting! You said that I came in here talking about freedom of speech. That is a lie. You did. I never said anything once about freedom of speech.
Why you are gaslighting, I don’t know. I mean it’s not even very good gaslighting.
yes it’s very clear that that is your position. You blame me because you failed to read the words in front of you. Here we see you trying to gaslight the blame onto me like it’s my fault your reading comprehension failed. The hypocrisy and project is really telling.
Let’s try another example since you clearly have a bee in your bonnet over gun rights,
Followed up by:
Person A mouths off at Person B who then punches Person A in the face.
At what point did you struggle to realize I’m not talking about the article? Was it the point where I said ‘let’s try another example’ or the point where I described a made up situation that had nothing to do with what happened in the article?
if you struggle this hard to follow basic discussions you might want to take a step back and have a long hard think about how you feel about a lot of issues. It’s clear you have a comprehension issue and it’s very likely that your opinions and positions are formed on clear misunderstandings.
I’m aware they’re different.
Are you capable or parsing what you actually read?
This is called an example because you’re clearly too wound up over gun rights, I thought I’d give you another example of a similar situation to see if you’d be capable of taking a step back and looking at something objectively. Thanks for answering that question though.
You’re lying again! And gaslighting! You said that I came in here talking about freedom of speech. That is a lie. You did. I never said anything once about freedom of speech.
Why you are gaslighting, I don’t know. I mean it’s not even very good gaslighting.
Read the whole message which is quoted above. I clearly identified that scenario as an example to make a point to you. Good lord.
Well now I can see why you think it’s the woman’s fault that she got shot. You think it’s my fault that you weren’t clear too.
It’s always the other person’s fault somehow.
I was very clear. All you had to do was read up 1 line and your inability to do that is to claim that someone is gaslighting you. Get help.
Like I said, it’s always the other person’s fault.
yes it’s very clear that that is your position. You blame me because you failed to read the words in front of you. Here we see you trying to gaslight the blame onto me like it’s my fault your reading comprehension failed. The hypocrisy and project is really telling.
Yes. I understand that I think it’s my fault that you weren’t clear.
What’s more clear than:
Followed up by:
At what point did you struggle to realize I’m not talking about the article? Was it the point where I said ‘let’s try another example’ or the point where I described a made up situation that had nothing to do with what happened in the article?
if you struggle this hard to follow basic discussions you might want to take a step back and have a long hard think about how you feel about a lot of issues. It’s clear you have a comprehension issue and it’s very likely that your opinions and positions are formed on clear misunderstandings.
Are you fucking mental?