• Spiderwort@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Personal cp filtering automation and a shared blacklist. That would take care of the problem. No moderator required.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Personal cp filtering automation and a shared blacklist

      Oh just those, eh?

      Just goes to show how little idea you have how difficult this problem is.

      • Spiderwort@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        This is starting to sound like, “we need constant control and surveillance to protect us from the big bad”.

        You know, for the children.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          Mate, if you don’t like the way we run things, go somewhere else. You’re not forced to be here.

            • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              25 days ago

              Of course I see your point you’re trying to make , but I also think you’re naive and don’t understand the repercussions of what you’re suggesting

              • Spiderwort@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                25 days ago

                As I see it, it’s just a question of whether personal tools (filters etc) can manage the conversation as well as central authority (admin, moderator).

            • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              25 days ago

              The culture of…having admins to maintain our servers? Dawg just make your own instance then, problem solved. Why is this even up for discussion? The whole point of the fediverse is you can set up your own server and connect with others under your own rules. If you want a mod-free space, you can literally make that.

              If you believe in unmoderated spaces that much to argue about it, but aren’t actually willing to make it yourself when it’s simple enough to do so, you’re just another social media agitator wasting time.

              • Spiderwort@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                25 days ago

                Do you think we need moderators to manage our conversations for us? I mean, in your opinion, is it an unavoidable necessity?

            • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              25 days ago

              And you are magnanimous for doing so. If someone came into my house and tried to dictate their rules to me, I’d be fuming.

              This is why I’m not a mod 🤡

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      If you can write an automated filter to block CSAM then Apple, Meta, Alphabet and others would happily shovel billions at you. Blocking CSAM is a constant and highly expensive job… and when they fuck up it’s a PR shit storm.

      • Spiderwort@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        Maybe keeping it off the network is a lost cause. If we each block it with personal filtering then that changes the face of the issue.