• phillaholic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe a hot take, but this goes for everyone. I see older people that can’t stay off their phones, and have little to no ability to multitask while doing it.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where I live older people don’t know how turn on phone. They watch tv instead. Those who have some sanity left also go outside, sit on benches, talk with each other and keep your bike from being stolen.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have ADHD and have the opposite problem most of the time - I can’t keep myself on one thing.

      • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        What about the left brain right brain simultaneous use, like people drawing two pieces of art at once or like how I can walk and be on my phone while being completely aware of my surroundings.

        Sometimes my brain is thinking in one space and my body is doing another. Like I hit auto pilot and stepped away from the cabin, yet the plane is still flying.

      • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Its pretty funny how people will take a single low-population college paper over the evidence of their own experience.

        I multitask daily, I have to it’s part of my job.

        • Goodman@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It depends on the definition I guess. I would consider driving a car to be multitasking. But doing three different office tasks on my laptop feels more like context switching as someone dubbed it here.

          But I’m just some dude it’s not like I’ve read any papers on it but that’s what it feels like for me.

          • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well I guess anything can mean whatever you want with that statement.

            Good luck understanding objective reality tho. But at lest you’ll never be wrong or be required to call your assumptions into question.

            Must be nice.

      • Sho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can’t upvote this enough, I have had ppl literally bragging to me about their ability to “multi-task” 🙄

      • BlueSquid0741@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Multi-tasking should rightly be called “context switching”. Your brain is alternating its focus between two things in extremely quick succession.

      • MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        “I’m good at multitasking” is just another way of saying you can’t focus on one thing at a 🐿️ SQUIRREL!

  • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m disappointed that most people seem to treat kids as subhuman, not needing the basic right privacy and freedom that they want for adults so much.

    • jan teli@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Because never in my entire childhood did I feel like a child. I felt like a person all along - the same person that I am today. I never felt that I spoke childishly. I never felt that my emotions and desires were somehow less real than adult emotions and desires.”
      —Orson Scott Card, Ender’s Game

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s important to note that a big part of that book is repeated evidence that Ender is not a “normal” child. He is heavily implied to have murdered one of his bullies before he was ever pulled out of society and into training (where he explicitly kills another bully).

    • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They don’t want the right to privacy and freedom for adults either though. Sure they might say they do if you ask them but as soon as they’re mildly inconvenienced by a protest or someone mentions children are in danger they’re all in favour of spying and censorship laws

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do people even use the term young adult anymore?

      Infantising of adults I think is a huge issue we have in society.

      It was the case that 16 was defacto adulthood in years gone by. Now I hear people saying you aren’t an adult till 25 or 30! If there are 25 year old wandering around that aren’t adults it’s a failing of the parents and society.

      In school when we hit ~16 we got treated entirely differently, the teachers talked to us instead of parents, we was in control of our time. They joked with us. It really made me grow up because I got treated like a grown up.

      Same thing with scouts and rugby when I was younger, being pushed to be responsible made me grow. As eduction improves overtime we should be making more capable 18 year old not less.

        • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          with modern science, we have learned that the prefrontal cortex hasn’t fully developed until around age 25. does that mean you’re a child at 24? no. but you are adolescent, and we should have some cognizance about that

          • Alpha71@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you cannot behave like an adult by the age of 24 there’s something more wrong with you than your prefrontal cortex.

            • Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              This is not about behaviour, it’s about brain functions. Humans brains under the age of 25 function in a different way, because they are not fully developed, no matter what behaviour people learnt to show.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So what of the kids going to do instead? People like this always demand that children go outside but there’s literally nothing for them to do.

    When I was a kid we used to sellotape each other to the swings and other wholesome activities. But we can’t do that anymore because the park activities have been removed apparently due to “vandalism” i.e normal wear and tear that took place over 10 years has occurred, but we cannot afford to fix it because central government hasn’t given us any money since 2014.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Even back when I was 9 and playground near my home was replaced with plastic shit for toddlers I knew it was plastic shit for toddlers. On the other side there was stuff for training though. Still nothing for 10-30 or not physically fit.

    • mellowheat@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That sounds like an American problem. We in many countries in Europe don’t have that problem, but our kids still waste their time on smartphones.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      My neighborhood has the same problem. There’s absolutely nothing for the teens to do. But all they do is complain in the forums about how the teens are wandering around causing trouble. They’re on the playground, they’re biking on the sidewalks, they’re playing chicken with the cars. Yeah, they’re f****** bored. The last thing you want in your neighborhood is a bunch of bored teenagers.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The last thing you want in your neighborhood is a bunch of bored teenagers.

        You forgot about angry mothers. They are scarier. That’s why youtube isn’t banned in russia yet.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Kids stood around and stared at their feet before swings were invented, I imagine.

      • 31337@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think many worked. On the farm, in mines, in factories. Farmers would intentionally have many children just for extra labor. School hours and breaks are, in part, the way they are to let children work on the farm.

    • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      but there’s literally nothing for them to do.

      You just hang out and do fun and stupid shit, it’s nice to have special place for it but a construction site and under the bridge is good enough. Problem is modern parents are extremely anxious.

      • bignate31@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was with you until the “construction site and under the bridge” bit. It definitely takes a bit of imagination, but I’m not sure not wanting your kids to play on a site which requires the use of hard hats classifies as being “anxious”

        • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Like play games (like war or something), roam around, make fires, have “gangs”, play other pretend stuff (basically role playing but without any real rules ) - ask your parents and grandparents what they were up to when they were kids.

    • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They can get bullied for not having phones, they can get bullied through phones and social media. They can get bullied for not having stupid ass Fortnite skins. Anything is an excuse for shitty kids who want to bully,

  • Melt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Single player games with retro graphic were enough to keep me entertained for hours when I was young. I can’t imagine how it’s like for the kids nowadays to have access to all the entertainment the internet provides.

    • son_named_bort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      And the adults back then bitched and moaned about how we were rotting our brains doing this instead of playing outside or reading or other activities they approved of.

      • DeadlineX@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right? Before that it was tv. Before that it was rock and roll. I was actually told to go outside more because I was READING TOO MUCH. Idk why everyone feels like their way of entertainment is better than everyone else’s. It’s so weird that we can’t let people enjoy themselves unless they do it our way.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, I grew up in the 90s and while we had video games and PC games, we also did a LOT of non video game activities.

        Riding our bikes, sports, making shit in our parent’s garage, playing in a band, RISK board game nights, cinema, arcades, hanging out at the mall, rc cars.

        I mean, there was almost no time to spend playing video games.

        Today’s youth are missing a lot, and they are setting themselves up for a lifetime of mental health issues and the inability to be resilient through a lack of experiences.

        My kids, fortunately, had at least part of their youth without a phone. I can’t imagine what disaster awaits kids who only know phones.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    More than 4,000 parents have joined a group committed to barring young children from having smartphones, as concerns grow about online safety and the impact of social media on mental health.

    Daisy’s got kids of a similar age and we were both feeling really horrified and worried and just didn’t want them to have smartphones at 11, which seems to be the norm now.”

    Fernyhough and Greenwell hoped the movement would embolden parents to delay giving their children smartphones until at least 14, with no social media access until 16.

    Smartphones expose children to a “world that they are not ready for” because they can access pornography and content on self-harm and suicide, which can have a detrimental impact on their mental health, Fernyhough said.

    Esther Ghey, the mother of Brianna Ghey, called earlier this week for a complete ban on social media access for under-16s, and said more people will have mental health issues unless tech companies take action to restrict access to harmful content.

    “They can live their childhood as they should do, focus on their learning and enjoy the real world without having to spend their life scrolling, which we all know is not good for them.”


    The original article contains 610 words, the summary contains 200 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who is buying the phones? The parents. So the parents buy their children a phone and then surprised Pikachu?

        • Fudoshin ️🏳️‍🌈@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’d be surprised! I was bullied throughout school for my shoes (fake Elllese). But one day I came in wearing a Fila jumper for non-school uniform day and everyone was my best fucking friend. Kids are evil.

      • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s still on the parents. My little lad is 15 and never had his own phone until his tweens. Amusingly, he was older than me when I got my first phone back in the 90s.

        He never got bullied for not having a phone.

        • ChexMax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          He may not have been bullied, but he may have missed out on bonding and closeness that his peers enjoyed. There was a study that showed life is way better for kids if they don’t have a phone, but only if their peers also don’t have phones

          • hulemy@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            This fact alone makes me conflicted about this. I don’t want my kids to walk around having phones from an early age, but I know first hand that being excluded as a kid is not a enjoyable experience. And kids are vicious creatures to each other too.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          All I never had was a Gameboy I didn’t get an actual phone until I was in high school.

          It had polyphonic ringtones and an IR blaster, it was the business.

        • Alex@feddit.ro
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          lol people calling 15-year-olds “little lads” makes me feel like a baby

          (i’m 13 :/)

      • PutangInaMo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not just pressure to get a fancy phone but that most of the socializing happens on social media now. Even if they sit in the same class, it’s a snapchat message.

        If they don’t have access to it, they’re social outcasts by default.

        It’s fucking crazy…

  • Grofit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t really see phones as a problem, it’s the rampant social media and ads that are the problem and unfortunately it’s too intertwined with society/technology to undo it at this point.

  • doublejay1999@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    But how will they ever stop these children from just walking into a store and buying a £500 phone and signing their own service contracts ?

    • soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The goal is to change the norm, Fernyhough said, so that when children come to the end of primary school, the class “bands together and says, ‘Let’s all delay until at least 14.’

      Yeah right that’s going to happen: p

      • soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        They can live their childhood as they should do, focus on their learning and enjoy the real world without having to spend their life scrolling, which we all know is not good for them

        Older people forget that the norm of childhood has changed. And assume that children should do the same things they did instead of learning how to moderate what they do

        • jan teli@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Why don’t kids play outside nowadays” Look out the window. What outside? How do they play there? They could go to a park, but how do they get there? They could play in the city, but would that be safe? They could go bush, but how? They could play around the neighbourhood, and then what, make a bike jump by digging a bit and gathering some dirt from a drain and get reported and then have the council put up signs saying that the area may be under surveillance despite there not really being anywhere to put cameras?

          • Meowing Thing@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exactly! Much easier just making something as “evil” than actually solving the issues around.

            Children shouldn’t be using their cells that much, but this is not solved by restricting access to it. It is solved by making communities and spaces child-safe and interesting for them.

            • jan teli@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah that last one about the kids making the bike ramp happened a fair few (~7?) years ago and all the signs are still there

              • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                We used to use the “no ball games” sign as a target. Eventually it fell off the wall.

                Usually some busy body police support community officer person, or some other individual in a yellow fluorescent jacket and no actual authority would turn up and yell at us, but we just wait until they went away.

      • phillaholic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is it that important? All technology gets better to the point of it just working, and when it rarely doesn’t, you contact someone who does. My grandfather could build cars from parts alone. My father could do most maintenance repairs and knew enough to understand what the mechanic was telling him. I know what video games and entertainment have told me about cars, but have no clue about it in real life. It hasn’t mattered. Cars are so reliable, I can just have AAA if I get in a bind.

        • rab@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are computer science students these days who don’t know what a file system is. Ponder that one for a moment

          • phillaholic@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I had to take a typing class in college. They can teach basics. It doesn’t take long to go over file systems.

            • rab@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              No it doesn’t. But I do university IT and recently did a file restore for a comp sci student. Sent him the file path. Student replied “the link doesn’t work what do I do with it?”

              Honestly I am so grateful gen z can’t computer because my whole life I was worried they would replace me. Not a chance…

        • ndondo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is. But in your defence at this point it only matters when something goes wrong. And that’s getting pretty rare.

          I think it’s why there’s such a clear divide between people who “just use Linux” and those who don’t. Modern computers hide almost all information that would let you figure stuff out on your own and Linux makes you figure stuff out like once a month.

          But all that means is that your choices are more and more limited. And it’s how Microsoft is able to sneak such predatory practices into their OS. You can’t go anywhere else

          • phillaholic@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t really agree with that conclusion. Linux is as old as windows and it had ample time to gain market share. Most people don’t want to tinker. I’ve posted recently about trying Linux for the first time in over a decade and how much worse the Ubuntu experience was than a decade ago. Meanwhile windows has gotten far easier to install and get going.

            • Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Really. Because it is all bloatware, all the settings menu’s are all over the place, things get jammed in your face ( Use this new thing we made so we can own you even more ) and other nonsense.

              A fresh install of Linux takes me far under 30 minutes. Most of them work out of the box.

              • phillaholic@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I just installed windows 11 in 15 mins on a 5 year old laptop for donation. The one with Linux had an unusable trackpad with no sensitivity setting, and some sort of flat pack installer system that I gave up on mostly because of the trackpad not allowing me to scroll more than a page and a half at a time. U until was easier 15 years ago.

  • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Uncool boomers be like: “It’s the damn phones”, when they’ve created cities where 2+ tons of metal can freely roam around wherever they like. They’ve created cities where kids cannot go anywhere on their own without being run over by these said metal beasts.

    But ofc uncle Kevin, “It’s dem damn phones. Can you at least look at me instead of scrolling through Facebook when I’m talking to you?”

    • rab@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol it has nothing to do with cars. I grew up in the 90s without a phone and my city wasn’t much different then than now. I was constantly outside playing and so were all the other kids

      • Misconduct@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I grew up in the 90s and my entire childhood neighborhood is concrete now. The overgrown wash where we built forts is gone. The desert surrounding the area? Gone. It’s just roads, shitty apartment buildings, and cement for miles. Maybe it didn’t change for you but my kids could never grow up the same way that I did there. Most of the more wild areas are gone. Banished to the outskirts of town now. Hell, we don’t even really have sidewalks and hardly anything is walkable due to traffic. It has everything to do with cars in plenty of places. There is literally nowhere for kids to be kids within walking distance of me now either.

    • Ilflish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it the boomers this time? I remember millennials thinking that about zoomers and now they’ve grown up, zoomers have been saying it about Gen Alpha calling them iPad babys

      • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        People say many things. It doesn’t change the fact that the ruling class is largely boomers. Hence, addressing the most influential voting class doesn’t seem so absurd to me.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You do realize that everything around you is mostly built by previous generations when you are not a “boomer”, cause your generation doesn’t do much yet other than differentiate between “cool” and “uncool”? And that’s true for every generation.

      • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Criticizing the ruling class is extremely important to a functioning society. Baby Boomers are largely the ones in power around the world. The largest voting bases of all conservative movements are baby boomers. I wouldn’t mind if the generations that follow criticize us for stuff. That’s just how stuff works.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not really, criticizing was commonplace and accepted in medieval societies, changes were made by disobedience and rebellions. (I have that fixation on Dutch 80-years war the last few days, hope to get rid of it.)

          EDIT: Point is - it doesn’t matter what you say when that doesn’t serve to exchange ideas without interruption and control, and all the talk in the Web in that spirit is controllable and interruptible. Also this can’t be true, there simply were no baby boom in many parts of the world in those years.

    • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It seriously is part ‘those damn phones’.

      I was a kid long before smart devices, cities were the same urban hellscapes.

      Instant gratification from unknown sources under the direction of a 9 year old is a serious problem and people like you who pretend its not are probably part of the generation damaged most by it.

      • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Instant gratification from unknown sources under the direction of a 9 year old is a serious problem and people like you who pretend its not are probably part of the generation damaged most by it.

        Eh, I have to agree begrudgingly. I remember having this discussion with someone I know about mental health post smartphones. We came across a few studies tracking mental health of adolescents for the past few decades. To compensate for lack of data (due to lack of mental health awareness, yadayadayada), they tried to inductively predict this missing data using various factors. The interesting part however was the increase in mental health issues in the early 2010s. Now of course, while their data might be quite error prone, I think it makes sense logically.

        1. More exposure to fked up world events (like Gaza, Ukraine, lack of climate action and so on) leads to one being depressed of course.
        2. In my experience, faceless trolls are much worse than in person bullies.

        So yeah, I do agree with you. The situation is not black and white. Unfortunately, the uncool boomers (sorry for the lame term,-I use it to not generalize all boomers) do not see it that way. Banning smartphones in schools is one of the stupidest things to do. Uncool boomers purely blame smartphones, and almost always engage dialog in bad faith. It’s mudslinging basically.

        Now, if I present a nuanced opinion here, it won’t be considered at all. Essentially similar to the “leftist long paragraph” meme. Therefore, to combat this, mudslinging back is most effective. At least it drives home some idea (in this case, the idea of walkable city design). Is this bad faith? Yea, unfortunately. But does it make sense to try to have a good faith dialog with someone who doesn’t want to have one?

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago
          1. More exposure to fked up world events (like Gaza, Ukraine, lack of climate action and so on) leads to one being depressed of course.

          What should I do if I live somewhere where fucked up event happens now? Or what kid in Belgorod/Odessa should do?

          1. In my experience, faceless trolls are much worse than in person bullies.

          People have different experiences. Mine is opposite. It happens.

        • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sorry no, there have been several studies about the negative mental health impacts of always on social media life in teens but you just like muddying the waters so you pretend it’s anyone’s game and give a backhand at the end of your drivel.

          Pretty sophisticated but still just forum sliding bullshit.

          • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sorry no, there have been several studies about the negative mental health impacts of always on social media life in teens but you just like muddying the waters so you pretend it’s anyone’s game and give a backhand at the end of your drivel.

            I haven’t come across these, but I don’t deny their existence. I just wrote down what I’ve come across myself. I already agreed with you on this point.

            Pretty sophisticated but still just forum sliding bullshit.

            I’m sorry that you feel that way. But as you demonstrated just now, you are not interested in engaging in good faith. You are still stuck on the “social media bad” train, when I already agreed with you on that. This is exactly what I mean by mudslinging. People just want to repeat certain phrases again and again, progressively louder and louder while vomiting ad hominems left and right.

            It isn’t “forum sliding” if the topic is indeed that complex. But as I stated before, you are not ready to move on from “social media bad”. Hence, how can one engage in good faith in such a scenario?

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not all doomers did it. But those who didn’t were communists.

  • fosstulate@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The elephant in the room is that parental controls development is a total wasteland, and has been for years. There’s no money in it. FAMAG is actively hostile to it and phone OEMs haven’t got a dog in the race and already contend with razor-thin margins. It’s one dimension of a broader political problem of digitization that smarter legislators and politicians have surely noticed by now, which is that unlike human beings, users increasingly don’t have any rights or agency worth a damn, and are treated with contempt.

    I like that a grassroots movement has remembered that parenting should be at the heart of children’s technology access, but I fear such groups’ ‘useful idiot’ value to authoritarian elements up to the same old tricks.

    • simple@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      But also apps intended for kids have been complete failures. The only thing they succeeded in was making platforms where advertisers target children easily. Youtube kids feels like a nightmare of elsagate and shovelware, and it’s scary parents are letting their kids use them without realizing just how bad they are.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That might have been partially the intent, but you also don’t see many platforms for kids or teens these days either. When’s the last time that something like Club Penguin was around, rather than everyone having to share the same network/platform?

    • DrunkenPirate@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      True point.

      My IT setup to get control of my daughter’s not-yet-rocketed-addiction is: screentime from Apple (that can be circumvented), seperated wifi for teens with on/off times (still they can use mobile network), blocked ip‘s for insta & tiktok at router level (still not all IPs in there), and a hacker-style tool called Firewalla to monitor and control their traffic with porn, youth filter-block ability (also in the router, but not sure how well this works at eg youtube)

      For this setup you need some steps beyond standard IT knowhow. And still it’s only 95%. Some day they find how to get through the little holes.

      Oh, this effort for 3-4 hrs screen time a day including podcasts and whatsapp.

      Next step will be to separate devices. She wants a new phone for birthday. Then we put Spotify for the podcasts on the old phone and block everything else. The new phone for the rest with even more reduced screen time.

      • Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wow, this sounds really dystopian. You monitor the porn that your daughters are watching? Then you’re an absolute nut job and maybe you should be the one who should have their technology access regulated.

        • DrunkenPirate@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          She is under 12! Start thinking before you shout.

          And btw it’s not monitor porn but porn filter

        • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yup, I’m disappointed, but most people seem to treat kids as subhuman, not needing the basic right privacy and freedom that they want for adults so much.

          • AtmaJnana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Ahh yes, we should let our 4 and 7 year old kids have unfettered 24-hour access to porn, gore, and combat footage or we are treating them as literal subhuman animals.

            Never change Lemmy.

  • alternative_factor@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    After the SORA AI reveal today I’m starting to see that luddites have a point. I don’t think we’ll ever have terminator-style scenarios but the amount of damage misinformation and disinformation is doing to our society and now WILL do to our society is proof enough we need to start stepping back. I’ve seen the amazing benefits of AI first hand - new drugs, new treatments, more medical knowledge than ever before, gene sequencing of never before seen organisms. I’ve seen AI help with all those amazing beneficial things.

    But I feel like the bad actors are wining, and winning very hard. Basically everything is unregulated and corporations refuse to take even a modicum of responsibility for anything. The worst thing is knowing that our octogenerian overlords don’t even know how to use a phone. I don’t see why i should continue to be a tech optimist when we all know that things are only going to get worse from here on out. In a post-truth society all we can really do is regress.

    • yamanii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The prophecy wasn’t on terminator, it was on metal gear solid 2, the truth will be unrecognizable from the fakes.

    • 50gp@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      quite concerning that misinformation is not taken seriously enough and is allowed to poison minds like a plague with no opposition

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think it may get to the point where tracking who owns what is a lost cause and societies with larger commons are going to pull ahead while our “individualism” centered societies will fall into an endless wave of scams and grifting.

        • mellowheat@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Sure. Then again, if the goal of getting your kid a phone is so that they won’t be ostracized, I’m not sure if a dumbphone will help with that.

          Kids in some parts of USA were shunned at some point because the messages they send get the wrong colored bubble. I.e. those losers are using Android phones instead of Apples.

          Things like this make me think that the solution has to be forced on all children. Or their parents, more like.