When Al-Qaeda themselves claimed responsibility, even with overwhelming evidence aside? Why were so many people still reluctant, I was researching about this stuff and was shocked to see people who I respect a lot believe in this

    • Dr_Satan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Some would call them “independent thinkers”

      What’s more admirable, to conform and be right or to think independently and be wrong?

      • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think the weaponization of ignorance is a more nuanced subject than a binary choice.

        There is no merit in pushing significantly disproven ‘theories’ like flat earthism.

        • Dr_Satan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          No doubt. But dang, when they call themself right because they quote the most popular authority, I feel a strong impulse the play it wrong.

          I mean, I’d push flat-eartherism just to highlight the absurdity of the popular epistemology. But that’s generally a pearls-before-swine situation.

          • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Funny you mention that, there is a Flat Earth society that was started as a joke with members just arguing for fun.

            They were mostly all replaced by true believers by the late 90s, I got to watch it happen.

            And it plays out the same way in so many ‘ironic stupidity’ forums.

            • Dr_Satan@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              The true believers have more zip than the careful contemplators, unfortunately.

              • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                This is a flaw in human nature that needs to be resolved before we move forward as a species.

                It is no longer a survival benefit to follow loud, angry people.

                • Dr_Satan@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  I dunno man. The ugly sciencey guy is a hard sell. There’s gotta be a third option.

                  Smiling grandfather in nice suit? Sexy fascist lady? Furry?

                  It’s all theater anyway. The mob does not respond to reason.

                  • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    I think Bill Nye gives us the best template: A kind of sciency guy with a background in media production.

                    The mob doesn’t respond to reason but it loves to be entertained, which is why we need more science communicators.

                    We need a Bob Ross for STEM.