When Al-Qaeda themselves claimed responsibility, even with overwhelming evidence aside? Why were so many people still reluctant, I was researching about this stuff and was shocked to see people who I respect a lot believe in this
When Al-Qaeda themselves claimed responsibility, even with overwhelming evidence aside? Why were so many people still reluctant, I was researching about this stuff and was shocked to see people who I respect a lot believe in this
I dunno man. The ugly sciencey guy is a hard sell. There’s gotta be a third option.
Smiling grandfather in nice suit? Sexy fascist lady? Furry?
It’s all theater anyway. The mob does not respond to reason.
I think Bill Nye gives us the best template: A kind of sciency guy with a background in media production.
The mob doesn’t respond to reason but it loves to be entertained, which is why we need more science communicators.
We need a Bob Ross for STEM.
Or we could just do what’s proven to work.
One lie-spewing puppet for the people who like vanilla. Another for those who prefer chocolate. Maybe a third for those strawberry-loving weirdos.
We want to keep them marching in the right direction. That’s all. Truth is utterly beside the point.
Is everyone from lemm.ee deranged?
Spoken like a good, right-thinking citizen. You clearly consume only the most truthful of news-streams.
The projection is delicious, you have no idea where I get my info from.
But I bet dollars to donuts that you have newsmax on your bookmarks bar.
Ok
Better?
You don’t need my approval to post, my dude.
Telling how you didn’t comment on the Newsmax part.
I honestly don’t even know what a “newsmax” is. Is that the “bad” news stream?
Just out of curiosity, what’s the “good” news stream?