• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Ok, agreed with how apple act, but iMessage won’t become a problem here, because nobody uses it.

    And if they do, which they won’t, then apple can be added.

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Fine, but why we should always wait for something to become (evenatually) a problem ?

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Stop saying it’s going to be a problem, there’s zero evidence that it will be. iMessage is dead in the water.

        Additionally, this law is restricting large chat apps that can dictate the market. iMessage can’t do that. It makes no sense to cover them here.

        • gian @lemmy.grys.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Stop saying it’s going to be a problem, there’s zero evidence that it will be. iMessage is dead in the water.

          Ok, I understant that. I am not saying that iMessage will be a problem, I am saying that if it will be ever become a problem, then you are will be in a rush to fix it when you could have simply prevented it.

          Additionally, this law is restricting large chat apps that can dictate the market. iMessage can’t do that. It makes no sense to cover them here.

          The law should apply to all chat apps in my opinion.

    • Link@rentadrunk.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not sure where you are in Europe but here lots of people use iMessage. If you have an iPhone and want to text another iPhone, it’s usually iMessage.

      If they don’t have an iPhone then people fall back to WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger or hell even Discord…