• Elon Musk purchased shares of Twitter after unsuccessfully petitioning the CEO to remove a Twitter account tracking his private jet.
  • Musk’s personal gripes played a key role in his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter.
  • Musk banned the account after promising not to, highlighting his prioritization of getting his way over free speech.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/ttBv9

    • Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      And sit with the peasants? No way.

      This won’t stop people from trying to eat him though.

      • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t wanna eat Elon I don’t know where he’s been and ketamine had made that meat all stringy.

  • Link@rentadrunk.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    What stopping someone from recreating this on mastodon or any other website?

    There is nothing special about Twitter which allowed people to track this jet.

    • telllos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think it’s really about visibility. If you don’t have the same visibility as twitter, you can have this wherever, it doesn’t matter.

    • ATDA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      The guy running it did just that.

      Musk’s actions are hilarious and pathetic. Anti censorship hero censored… Public data.

  • kadu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I said Musk would attempt to buy Twitter as soon as Reddit started posting about him being angry about the jet tracking.

    People told me I was crazy, nobody would buy a social media platform just to suppress one account.

    It was obvious - Musk behavior is clearly that of an insecure teenager, paired with a lot of money.

  • RonSijm@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    So the full story would be that Elon stayed up until 5:30 a.m playing Elden Ring in a Vancouver hotel - was very stressed, saw on Twitter that people knew he was raging in Vancouver based on the Jet Tracker - stressing him out even more -
    Though “Fuck it, maybe I can’t beat Malenia, but at least I can beat this asshat on Twitter tracking me!”

    …If only FromSoftware had added some pay-to-win elements… Like “For A Small $1 billion Micro-Transaction you get the uber Malenia slayer sword!” -
    We would be living in a totally different timeline

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    For perspective, $30 billion would afford the food and freight to feed every human on Earth for a year.

    Less than that would make him a god in Haiti (that is, elevate the nation out of crisis and put a bronze statue of Musk in every state park commemorating how awesome he is.

    A few billion could provide free high-speed internet to everyone worldwide. Curiously Musk considered this, but then wondered how to get everyone to pay fees for it.

    • BillSchofield@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m having trouble figuring out the math for this. My assumptions lead me to divide $30b by 8b people, which is about $4/person. I’m not confident that people can eat on $4 for a year.

      What am I getting wrong?

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        That the costs scale down the more massive the production. If you’re in the industrialized world, the money you pay for food is almost all profit. Not the cost of agriculture, not the cost of harvesting and packaging, not freight time, maintenance and fuel, not logistics and accounting. Profit.

        Most of our money spent is bribes goes in the pocket of each of the capitalists along the way taking their bit of rent.

        • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          They clearly stated

          food and freight to feed every human on Earth for a year

          It’s a shit load of money, but let’s be honest you need way more than that to feed everyone. If Musk decided to donate all of his fortune, then maybe that’d be true.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Musks fortune was only 340b at its peak, and the moment he tried to access 44b of it for Twitter it collapsed the price.

            Even 340b is still only $41 a year for everyone.

            • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yea even assuming the 340b a 25 pound bag of rice was about 22 bucks when I googled it and about the same for cheap beans. Maybe between the two a person could survive a long time but it wouldn’t be pleasant. I’m sure if you buy in those bulks you could get it for way cheaper too but still, math doesn’t add up.

              • sundray@lemmus.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                Based on the prices I looked up you could feed everyone on Earth 1,800 kcal of potatoes for one day for around 40 billion USD. So… lets do it! Global spud day! Don’t ask me where to get a pot that big for boiling all them taters though.

    • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      A few billion could provide free high-speed internet to everyone worldwide

      Since there is about few billion people on earth, does that mean that high speed internet costs about a dollar per person? You did not think this through, did you?

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        There are eight billion people on earth, so it’s even cheaper. Internet access is one of those things that requires infrastructure that gets cheaper per user as it scales up. At a global level, yes, internet should be ridiculously cheap per capita.

        The cost we pay here in the US is mostly profit for the oligopolies that control the last mile. Licensing fees because they control access via legal obstruction. If I were to create a community server, it could be much cheaper as a non-profit cooperative, but for the cost defending from litigation from the established chains.

        In other words, cost of the internet is inflated by force, not because internet access is expensive to construct and maintain.

  • gian @lemmy.grys.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Assuming this is true, there are methods to have the same result that are way less expensive…

  • Additional_Prune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    LOL. There’s a silicon valley bigwig jet tracker that I see pop up on my Reddit account, and I’m not even that interested in it.

  • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Elon Musk burning billions of dollars to not have his public information publicly posted is one of the biggest Ls he’s ever taken and that’s a long list to fight to the top of.

  • nednobbins@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I wouldn’t doubt that was his initial motivation for making the suggestions.

    I also remember that he tried to back out of buying Twitter multiple times. While doing so he was pretty public about all the crazy crap he would do with Twitter.

    Despite all that Twitter went to a judge and got them to force Musk to complete the sale. He’s a crappy CEO for Twitter but it’s kind of on the former Twitter leadership for forcing that situation.

    • MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      He offered Twitter more money than the company was worth with no due diligence.

      The leadership of the board could have been sued by shareholders if they didn’t push Elon to actually pay over market value.

      The end goal of any for profit leadership is to make as much money as possible and exit.

  • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I think he was trying to get out of Twitter and wanted to do a real life version of his Dogecoin pump and dumps. You know, talk a big game, hype up how the stock is gonna go to the moon after he brings his genius to bare on the company, then dump the stock and pull out of the deal. However, during the hype phase he managed to say some legally binding things and suddenly found himself forced to honor what he thought was going to be empty hype.

      • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        So is racking up debt in shell companies and claiming bankruptcy on them but it didn’t stop Trump either.

      • Scrof@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s his entire business model. Just look at starship, hyper loop, solar roofs and Tesla semi. Overblown Tesla stock bubble too. All complete vaporware, but he profits greatly from the hype alone. He belongs in prison as he is a classic conman.

        • laverabe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          As much as I personally dislike Musk, Starship does not belong on that list. It is the largest and most powerful space vehicle humanity has ever launched successfully and landed! It is re-usable and can potentially carry up to 100 people or 300,000 lbs of cargo.

          Nothing like that has ever been done before, and the advancements in science that will follow humanities expansion into space cannot be overstated.

          • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            100 people are, like, 19,000 lbs. Why the weight difference between 100 people and just cargo? Because of life support systems?

            • laverabe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              1 ton per person for living quarters, supplies, etc. I’m not sure if life support is part of that, and also not sure how exactly they settled on 1 ton.

              SpaceX has stated that Starship, in its “baseline reuseable design”, will have a payload capacity of 100–150 t (220,000–331,000 lb)

              https://wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starship

    • arc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s worse than that. The usual way of buying a company is a memorandum of understanding followed by due diligence, followed by signing a contract and then the actual completion. Elon went straight to signing the contract and then had big old shit fit when the Twitter board held him to the terms of the contract and the penalties for pulling out.

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m also convinced the entire purchase was an accident but I think he was doing the usual far-right “try and shame people for standing up to nazis”.

    • underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      He did more than say legally binding things. He signed a contract. That had a clause in it to prevent him from backing out, because the management at Twitter fully expected him to try it. I think he had made several gestures at buying before to try and get some kind of influence over how it was being run, so they drew up the contract to make him put up or shut up.

      • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Makes you wonder what the og twitters guys are doing now besides drinking mai tais on the beach

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    All that money could have gone to something useful that would have benefited everybody and instead it went into investors pockets