I just noticed today that Signal (not talking Molly) is now available on F-Droid via the “Guardian” repository.

Just wanted to give everyone a heads up.

  • Tlacuachito@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I was gonna say, I got Molly-FOSS from F-droid, but I actually had to go back and check. It checks out though. I did also get obtainium so I can keep a better eye on updates and actually check the changes on git before updating something as important as secure, encrypted coms. Also I figured I should really start checking the signature each update from now on.

  • Please rename the thread to “Signal in the Guardian project F-Droid repo” or something like that to avoid confusion, because as you have noticed, it’s not available in the main F-Droid repo, just in the third-party repo maintained by the Guardian project

  • Tlacuachito@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is there anything specifically wrong with molly. It seems more locked down by default and is fully open source. Seems better to me.

    • scoobford@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Iirc Molly in F-droid still using FCM and the google maps API. If you want Molly-Foss, you have to use Obtanium to pull APKs from their git releases.

    • sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, nothing wrong with it. I use it actually. People are used to Molly being on F-Droid so I didn’t want anyone to think that I was referencing that instead of actual Signal.

  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I have a tangential question. Would it not make sense for an OS, in this case Android, to have some proper mechanism for installing apps (in this case APKs) directly from a website (as lots of people have been doing fastidiously from signal.org by necessity)?

    After all, this is all about trust. With software, assuming that you trust the developer, the goal is to be sure that nobody interfered with the developer’s compiled software - and who better to guarantee that than the developer themself, at their own domain? DNS resolution is already based on the “web of trust” principle, which is why you can trust your bank’s website. Arguably F-Droid performs a valuable role as a curator and selector of good software, but is there any good technical need for it to actually distribute the software?

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not sure if this fits your definition of OS, proper, or install, but FWIW you can already download an apk directly from github using most Android browsers and it will open (or give you the option to open) it with the system’s package installer.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yep and that’s exactly what we doing with Signal to avoid the Play Store. It’s a bit of a PITA and it’s the same on desktop. It’s because they don’t want third parties maintaining their packages.

        My crazy utopian idea is for some kind of protocol (or equivalent) that would allow native package managers (mobile or desktop) to “plug in” to the website repos of authors, directly.

    • said@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not exactly answering your question but you can use the app Obtainium to fetch the apk URL from a website/github repo and many other sources to install directly. It also supports fdroid repos and many other sources out of the box. Kinda half way what you mentioned in your first paragraph.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes true! Forgot about Obtainium. Personally I’m not much tempted because all it does is swap out F-Droid for Github (i.e. Microsoft) as the middleman. But I agree that it’s definitely a win for convenience.

        • said@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Of course Github is just an example but you can pretty much regex any URL and further filter out anything in order to get the apk link with it. So depending on your level of privacy requirement and trusted sources, you can skip all the centralized ones and build your own list of sources.

          • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            So it does! OK so this is pretty close to a decent solution after all (the ideal one being IMO exactly the same thing but native to the OS). Thanks for the correction.

  • KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Please forgive if this is a stupid question, but what is the difference between the play store version and this? Assuming it is not altered by a bad actor.

    • powermaker450@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think the main difference is that the Play Store version can use FCM (Google Play Services) for notifications, while the APK Signal distributes only receives notifications over a background WebSocket connection.

      • KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        That is interesting. Thanks to you and the others.

        Does the use of the google play services allow google to sort of…listen in or be privy to your app usage in any way?

        • powermaker450@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Google cannot see any message content of Signal notifications through FCM. It’s more like a “heads up” to the Signal app, telling it “hey, there are new messsges. wake up and check what they are.”. The Signal app then checks for messages and does all the decrypting and whatnot itself.

          While it’s possible that the timing of FCM telling the app to check for notifications could be used to correlate activity, that’s an edge case that if you are concerned about can be easily avoided by just using the background WebSocket or a fork of Signal like Molly that allows you to use a third-party UnifiedPush provider to check for messages in the background, instead of FCM.

    • Wolfie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      As i recall, ALL apps in google play store, have to have some sort of google shit embedded into it. Therefore, its better to download something outside of google if you want to remain degoogled.

  • zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s weird that this isn’t mentioned on the signal website or blog? They also distribute the binary with a signature you can check there.

  • iii@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Perhaps a result of the proposed ban on distributing tiktok via google and apple is that some developers rethink their distribution mechanisms