Summary

Rep. Dan Crenshaw criticized Apple Maps for not renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, as mandated by Trump’s recent executive order titled “Restoring Names that Honor American Greatness.”

Crenshaw’s complaint reflects broader conservative frustration, as tech platforms and the global community continue to use the original name.

Critics compare the move to past nationalist gestures like renaming french fries “freedom fries,” accusing conservatives of embracing identity politics and culture wars despite their political dominance.

The name change is unlikely to gain international traction.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    As someone who worked in mapping, many people don’t realize how much this kind of BS actually comes up.

    The map you see in Google / Apple maps isn’t the map the whole world sees. What you see is what’s culturally / legally appropriate for viewers in your region.

    For example, in parts of India it’s legally required that Jammu and Kashmir be displayed as being part of India on their maps. On Pakistan’s maps it’s legally required to be weirdly ambiguous, with a strange open border that doesn’t properly close. The rest of the world gets dotted lines indicating it’s complicated.

    For most of the world the body of water between Korea, Japan and Vladivostok is labeled as “The Sea of Japan”, but users in Korea will see “The East Sea”. Is the body of water around Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait, UAE, etc. the Persian Gulf or the Arabian Gulf? Depends on where you are when you ask that question.

    This even has a strange effect when all the countries involved agree that a certain geographic feature is the border, but that geographic feature is a river. Some rivers, especially ones like the Amazon river keep shifting. Sediment piles up, erosion happens, and the river shifts. The river is still the border, but now someone has to go in and adjust the political border to match the river’s new position.

    So, if Trump does do something official to rename the Gulf of Mexico, the online mapping companies (and any offline ones that are left) will probably follow the rule and rename it… for their American users. The rest of the world will still see it as the Gulf of America. It will just be yet another one of those funny exceptions the companies have to keep track of while displaying maps for a certain subset of users.

      • olympicyes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Honestly that makes more sense than Gulf of America because at least it is a bit more descriptive. Looking forward to Mexico renaming Gulf of California next.

        • VerifiedSource@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Mexico has two states named Baja California and California Sur at the gulf of California.

          If anything California should be renamed to something less Mexican like Triumphia. Renaming the major cities to City of Angels, Saint Francis, Saint Joseph, Sacrament, Saint Doug, Ash Tree would then follow suit.

    • Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Cause most google users aren’t americans and the mental illness of a few sex criminals would disrupt their service.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      That post also prompted me to check Google maps, and I got Gulf of Mexico, thankfully. However I’m sure there will soon be a US version with the proper denomination so that the new masters of the land can be placated.

  • porsche13@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Is this what small government looks like? I thought these guys were all about reducing regulations and allowing businesses to do as they please, free from government restrictions.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You don’t understand. They should be free of your restrictions, you should be bound by their restrictions.

    • Randelung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You know some friend of the administration already took that spot. It was probably their idea in the first place.