• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    So you’re making it quite a logical leap there.

    Read my post again, please. I said: “from 45% to 69%”. I accounted for the 69% at the maximum, while recognizing the lower percentage.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        My issue wasn’t the numbers, it was the concept.

        The numbers are the placeholders in my statement for the concepts. Each of the concepts you’re calling out has a number attached to it in my citation. If you refuse to acknowledge the numbers, simply use them as placeholders for the concepts as they are 1:1.