• reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    In the US, I would make history part of the standardized testing done by states and make it part of SAT/ACT tests. Too often it’s a neglected subject even though there are many valuable lessons from it.

    Same with government class. People need to understand how government works, how to get involved, how to vote. Make high school students attend a court trial one week as part of their class. Make them vote in a mock election using the actual voting equipment used in elections.

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I think it helps to stop thinking of the subjects as silos. I teach science in a way that calls on writing skills (and I throw in lots of history of science references).

    I’ve worked with students on all subjects and grades. In my teaching, the best experiences I have had have had two features:

    1. small group size (working with a kid one on one is god tier - today me and student ended up chatting about video games, and I got to talk about the historical context of the Assassin’s Creed series/how Dragon Ball is inspired by the Journey to the West)

    2. teacher autonomy - being able to pivot from curriculum that doesn’t work, being able to work with students to accept multiple forms of representation

    I think both of these factors are the root problems. It’s not about “what” we are teaching them, it is that we are herding them through school buildings like cattle and flashing “educational content” at them through laptop screens. Switching the videos they are watching isn’t going to fix the problem.

    Like, when it comes to learning to read - it does not matter what the kid likes to read. All reading is good reading. You build your curriculum around books they like and engage with. If you build reading skills, so much of the rest can follow.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I would have elementary logic in high school. Anyone who knows reading/writing/arithmetic is ready for logic so it can be done when they are ready for algebra. I would also have senior year science be done in journal club format where a students present at least least one paper a semester and tests are given over all papers presented (which of course all students should be reading before the presentation.)

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 hours ago

    1 - Critical Thinking

    2 - World History

    3 - Civics

    4 - Apocalypse survival skills (If the first three don’t make a dent)

    5 - Everything else (if there’s time)

  • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    1 Critical thinking

    2 Healthy relationships

    2 Cookery

    3 Exercise

    4 Arts & Engineering

    5 The usual subjects

    4839 AI (or whatever the industry du jour is.)

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Based on my experience and that of my own kids, what worked and didn’t:

    Kids are all different so there is not one plan that will suit them all! In general though - K-6 should be half day of academics, half day of electives and free time, they just need to learn to read and do math comfortably, understand the idea of variables and some basic science about the physical world. Grades 7-12 should have science, literature, maths, art of some sort (kid choice - dance, music, visual art, creative writing, something that makes them think in a different way) and some learning about the world in a cultural sense - political geography, history, government styles. Some sort of physical education too - dance or sport for those able, health and gentle movement education for those who are not able, everyone should learn to maintain their bodies not just their mind, they are connected.

    The kids of mine who went through the “IB” here got by far the best education of my offspring, but they were also the most naturally academic of the lot so it suited them, understand? The others would just collapse in the face of a program like that! You can’t just force everyone into the same shape.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve been done with education for longer than I’ve been in education.

    I hope kids nowdays get a well rounded education that is not just the bare necessities of read/write/count but if I had to make a choice I’d prioritize STEM over humanities.

    I’d rather live in a boring world with too little music, literature and art where my car works and I’ve got water in the tap than the opposite.

  • ace_garp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Most core subjects are about what is possible in the world and give a great rounded understanding of different skills and disciplines available around our planet.

    I think food awareness is essential for all young people.

    In primary/elementary school, children should have exposure to planting, growing, harvesting, and cooking their own vegetable produce and meals.

    In high school, students should be able to kill, prepare, and cook their own animal foodstuffs. Able to opt out of this of course.

    Understanding whole foods, cultivation, and livestock for food, would go a long way towards educating people about what quality, healthful food is.

    …and that high fructose corn syrup is not food.

      • ace_garp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 hours ago

        The ideal would be to use the kitchen-garden time as an example for other lesson concepts. eg.

        Area of the garden plots, students measure the length x width, etc.

        Volume, measure the amount of water used in a week to maintain the garden.

        Vocabulary and spelling of associated horticultural words.

        The animal preparation in high-school would be a one off excursion experience, rather than having pens in the school for daily maintenance.

  • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think I’d keep a lot of the core stuff, esspecially at lower levels, but at mid levels, I’d try and put a lot less emphasis on academic work, and more on practical implementation of those skills. For example, in place of a study of shakesphere, I might put a lesson on how ads are written. The point would still be to encourage better media literacy, but ads are something we see constantly in the modern world, and require an emphasis on critical thinking most literature analysis ignores. Another example might be a reduction in the amount of math classes, but requiring a skill that uses math practically, such as woodworking or 3D modeling, to try and practice logic and problem solving off-the-page.

    Ideally, this would help cover a lot more real-world skills, and give students a chance to try a broader range of fields earlier, as well and encouraging a deeper and more applicable understanding of the underlying skills meant to be taught.

  • Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I would go by tiers.

    Kindergarten/Pre-School is fine as it is. Middle-School is where you’re to learn the basics of life and in general of what you need to know when developing. High School is to be the place where those same courses are advanced, like you’re to learn how to budget, how to file taxes, sex education a priority .etc

    College is the real deal where you’re to learn even more advanced courses. These things would just assist eachother so nobody feels like they’re left behind, everyone is on the same page.

    • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Is there enough days in the semester? They can’t get away without representing my religion. That is church of the big sleep. Let’s face it, we will spend more time dead than alive so our natural condition must be closer to sleeping then it is being awake in this chaotic ooze called life. It’s obvious to me that life is abnormal and we should all use this time to better navigate our dreams and others sleep states because that will better prepare us for what’s to come.

    • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      This right here. My parents utterly failed to teach me financial literacy, and it wasn’t mentioned once in grade school or high school. But I learned how to stuff a pillow (why?!) and definitely got a C for frying an omelet the way I like it during a totally antiquated home economics class.

      If financial literacy had been properly taught, I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t be a decade behind my contemporaries. It’s frankly a complete failure of our education system that this gap in critical knowledge hasn’t been filled.

  • undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Maybe not a direct answer to your question but I’d try to keep it the lowest number of subjects at any given time with deeper learning in them.

    In school I was genuinely interested in learning, but every instructor seemed to hand you a mountain of homework each day and acted like their subject was the most important. I spent most my time scrambling to get it all done and in the end only learned what little I could to simply pass.

    I remember this especially with math, I loved math but if I took the time to study better and actually learn the concepts, I wouldn’t have had the time to finish my other homework.

    • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m not sure if there needs to be fewer subjects, but I feel like there should be much more focus on why what students are learning matters. Passing a standardized test is not a goal kids care about. This invariably has to be at the expense of rote information since there is only so much time, though I think that is a worthwhile trade.

      Nobody cares about the exact year that Mehmet II conquered Constantinople. But the impact of that on world history is both interesting and significant. I only had one history teacher before college who told students he didn’t care about exact years; if you could give the general period that was sufficient.