An abandoned mine in Finland is set to be transformed into a giant battery to store renewable energy during periods of excess production.

The Pyhäsalmi Mine, roughly 450 kilometres north of Helsinki, is Europe’s deepest zinc and copper mine and holds the potential to store up to 2 MW of energy within its 1,400-metre-deep shafts.

The disused mine will be fitted with a gravity battery, which uses excess energy from renewable sources like solar and wind in order to lift a heavy weight. During periods of low production, the weight is released and used to power a turbine as it drops.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is one of those ideas that in hindsight seem so simple and obvious that it makes one wonder how nobody thought of it prior. Absolutely brilliant.

        • hannes3120@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Got this it’s definitely a great application - I think what he was referring to is that it’s very inefficient if you don’t have a perfect mineshaft for it right next to renewable energy.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not if the energy would go to waste. This is a mechanical battery to store surplus power generation from things like wind and solar.

        • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s the whole point of grid energy storage. Even if there are losses, it’s acceptable considering that otherwise you would need to burn fossil fuels in a peaker plant to keep the grid balanced. You aren’t supposed to recharge a battery like this with fossil fuels.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          It wouldn’t go to waste if we were to use “gravity batteries” that have existed for centuries: hydropower

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yes, and they use lakes of water to have enough mass to make it worthwhile. No weight down a mineshaft is worth it.

      • LanternEverywhere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s similar but different in a lot of meaningful ways. Hydro pumping like that requires a relatively large body of water next to a large geographical height right nearby. This new system doesn’t require any water, and it uses a man made hole in the ground that’s already been created and which otherwise would be simply unused

      • seang96@spgrn.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I read of another it was the same physics but different scenario. I think it was like excess energy moves heavy carts up a hill. When energy is needed, these carts get released and their potential energy from hill and the basic idea of regenerative breaking to repurpose it’s kinetic energy.