• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s an advantage that trans people who can ‘pass’ have, but not every person looks physically enough like their expressed gender and suddenly they’re “a man in a dress” or something.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well, what is the function of having sex/gender on an ID? It’s to make someone more identifiable, right?

      That means that “verification” only needs to be visual. The purpose is to be able to tell, at a glance, that the ID and the person are a match. That’s why eye color and height are on there too. Precise record keeping is for the court house and hospital records, not a driver’s license.

      By using sex and making that unchangeable it actually makes my ID less useful for identifying me.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Then they’d get harassed by cops for having a suspected fake ID and have to go through the trouble of proving its their actual ID.

          Like I am going to be when we get a law like this.

        • Saxoboneless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          This process is already gatekept, to my knowledge. In my state, changing your legal gender id or name requires going through the courts and a substantial amount of legal paperwork - even if you do so without a lawyer, there are some substantial fees associated with that process. Not to mention if someone wanted to become less identifiable, they probably wouldn’t want to do that in a way that is available as public record. Personally, I’d probably just get a haircut - they’re a lot faster and a lot cheaper.

          Additionally, banning everyone - especially banning exclusively trans people - from fixing their documentation is not a reasonable solution to your hypothetical problem, a fact so obvious anyone arguing in good faith almost certainly would have caught it.