• TheHottub@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Paycheck to paycheck and your payment is more than you spend on groceries. And your loan has doubled in size because of interest. And will continue to grow. Meanwhile your credit is garbage and you can’t get ahead. Bad credit? Crappy car, needs fixes. Higher interest rate. I’m 41 and trying so hard to get ahead of it.

      At the very least cap the interest for people. Or how about no interest. You can’t chip away at something that’s growing faster than you can swing at it.

      • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I agree with you here. I’ve always said, if you’re putting in work to get an education, the interest on the loan should be zero. Yes, zero.

        Over time it means the lender (read: govt) loses money, so what. The increased tax income for an educated employee more than accounts for that. Even if it didn’t, what’s the downside to an educated workforce for anyone but those in power?

        Education should not be a for-profit scheme.

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          The government has no problem giving away 0% interest loans, often with principal forgiveness, for tens of millions of dollars to fund infrastructure. How is university not a similar investment in the future?

      • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Best we can do is crippling debt in a dystopian shitscape to pay off the degree they lied to you about being able to get a good enough job to raise a family because you got that degree, taking on tens, maybe hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt.

    • init@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Counter argument–having bad credit is also meaningless if you can never afford to purchase something like a house, and you’re ok with purchasing used vehicles and renting from smaller landlords and not property management companies.

        • init@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Wholeheartedly agree. And then we go around panicking about the authoritarian social credit shit China has. Mfer we’ve have social credit for decades

          • Poxlox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Respectfully, that is apples to oranges. You are unable to function as a regular person in China with bad social credit. Here you can’t get loans and sometimes your employer sees.

          • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            In my state all the lenders came to the legislature several years back and make a big push to try and come up with a new type of credit score that was primarily based on driving history. Apparently, driving history is like a way more accurate predictor of your credit worthiness than your financial history. So I guess my point is that they will scrape data anyway then can get it and use it to judge how much you have to pay to access money.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s a far less bad scam than the previous version of be a white guy that’s friends with the local bank.

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The consequences already suck. It’s damned if you do damned if you don’t. At least I can keep (some of) my money this way.