This subject tends to draw out the worst in people, oddly enough. She has this strange Order of horny men and faux-feminists who will die defending her over I don’t know what. If that’s you, please, put your emotions aside for a second, and look at Sydney Sweeney objectively (ignore the large rack, blonde hair, and smooth skin and LOOK AT HER)… Is she “beautiful”? She kinda has a horse-mouth smile, her eyes are weirdly far apart, she has big ears, and a pug nose. Sexy, sure. But any woman can be sexy if she’s not obese and has Hollywood image juggernaut at her disposal. Koinophilia? Check. Properly proportioned body? Check. Youthful? Check. But is she beautiful? Personally, I’d say no. Just another busty blond that frankly is probably a lovely woman, and she is attractive no doubt… but she’s no work of art.
Looks are subjective. This post is weird.
looks are patently NOT subjective. there is a definitive standard for beauty. Sydney Sweeney does not fit it.
Tell this to Rubens.
touché
He was PeeWee Herman right
Just for funsies, please state the definitive standard for beauty for review.
Thanks.
There is an entire study of the field of beauty, whole philosophical disciplines, and you want me to sum it up in one comment? Ha, nice try.
Why do I feel like we’re two messages away from a lesson in phrenology?
I’m not falling for that bait.
So you’re looking for validation, not an honest discussion. This whole thing just got more weird. You’re weird.
lol XD waiting for you to explain why she’s beautiful. go ahead, try.