• commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    all the people involved in those markets were making decisions distinct from the people making decisions in the milk market. I dont think we can find anything so conclusive.

    • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      We can. There’s no way a commodity will be produced at scale without a market for it. It happens all the time. This is some high in a dorm level cope.

            • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 days ago

              Dosen’t matter if it happens or not. It’s it’s not required to prove the case because of the overwhelming evidence in every other market where it has. The idea that something will be produced at a loss forever just because you can’t accept that it won’t is troll-level ludicrous. So, hats of to you for that bait, I guess.

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 days ago

                I’m not going to believe something without evidence. your hand waiving is not evidence, and historical data about irrational actors is not predictive about the future of those same markets. it can’t be reliable evidence about the future in a separate market.