It is clear that the signal to noise ratio of the WWW is getting worse. It’s much harder to find good content when using a good old search engine. And if it’s good it is usually hosted on Reddit or Stackexchange.

So remember, even if it’s easy too Google something (well, it isn’t nowadays), we want to create a fediverse of good content that helps people (I hope). So, it’s always better to write a real answer if you have the time and energy. Please help boost the SNR and reverse the AI fueled information degradation loop.

  • mapumbaa@lemmy.zipOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    If someone actually wants help searching Lemmy or the Fediverse, I recommend this site: https://fedi-search.com/

    Very simple, but it does the job. It’s also good if one wants to learn advanced Google queries.

  • Maalus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The issue with that is trolls who either 1. ask for source when something is an easy to find fact of life (i.e. it doesn’t need a scientific paper / article or whatever to prove). To later try to convince / discredit you that your link does not show what you claim (when it does). This one is to waste the other person’s time and nothing else, and is really popular by kremlin bots 2. launch an outlandish claim with no source, you counter it and then you are asked by OP to provide your source, then back to 1. for the rest of the bullshit that they do.

    Ultimately it doesn’t matter much when you reply to 2 - 3 people like that, but posting more often, it does simply waste your time.

    Source about these tactics

    • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is still better than the opposite tactic of sending your opponent to google it and when they don’t find anything saying that it’s because they are not trying hard enough.

      Source: google it

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I dont think I’ve hardly ever seen someone asking for sources on obvious truths or pretend a source is lying. They just say Nuh uh or Cuss out

      I have, however, seen a LOT of people claim shit that isn’t true at all and try to pass it off as basic fact, and

      I’ve seen even more people post sources that don’t actually say what they’re trying to prove.

      And i dont think this is really the point of the Google it conversation

    • Merlin@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Its a bit annoying when i google something and search forums and cant find an answer and i go to ask reddit or a forum and someone says"just google it" like am i really expected to make a preamble every ask-post that I’ve searched already?

  • ted@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Even if you want to be snarky, at least do something like:

    I [googled it](searchresult.com) for you.

    • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m not kidding, one time I saw that and the first result was back to that thread where the only answer was to Google it.

    • cytokine0724@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I understand the temptation for snark, but if you’re going to snark, I suggest that “here is how I googled it for you” is a better response, wherein you explain the terms you chose and how you selected the most pertinent result.

      Definitely more work, but even if the OP is infuriating, there are people who will find the answer in the future, and who would benefit from the explanation of something that might be obvious to us but not them.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Alternatively

      I googled it for you
      
      > Copy pasted answer in case the source disappears
      
      
  • Zement@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I feel like it’s 2000 all over again on the Internet. The bloat has made pages borderline unusable, and using AdBlock or NoScript reverts any so-called “design progress” back to the good old HTML days.

    Google is only semi-useful now, while pages like DuckDuckGo are starting to deliver results reminiscent of the old Yahoo or Lycos days.

    It feels like my trusty, old-school Internet skills are helping me navigate this mess. The reemergence of usenet / groups feels inevitable.

    • sheogorath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s like a bouncing ball, social media starts small, and then it became bigger. It’s trending on becoming small again. In the future (barring civilization ending war/calamity) it’ll become big again due to some technological progress or shift in society.

  • wicked_observer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I never say it like that. But I’ll tell people I found it by searching it. People really need to learn how to search first.

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Noooooo don’t “Just Google it” try, “Use a Search Engine”<br> Dont’t make Google an integral part of internet

    • brian@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      on one hand I agree. on the other, google has historically been afraid of the verb to google becoming generic, so of course I’d like to see that happen.

      I think the middle ground is say google it, but make it clear you mean google it on an alternative search engine

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yep, just like Kleenex, or Xerox, (a faded term for mimeograph/photocopy), Google has become a generic verb/term for search in virtually every language now. To google something is synonymous with search. It no longer implies a specific search engine. (I use Ghostery private search myself). Google has lost the war on their name and “It’s a Good Thingtm

        But there does seem to be a greater amount of “search entitlement” these days for even the easiest of problems. People as a very general rule don’t seem to want to be bothered by the need to learn things on their own. They expect others to provide them all the answers in an effortless format.

        I’ve even provided detailed answers to people on some ‘life threat level’ activities that were rejected because I didn’t simply reaffirm their ignorant and misguided thoughts in looking for shortcut answers.

    • udon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I wish I had the power to make google a not integral part of the internet just by calling it duckduckgoing.

      On that note: If you talk about what you searched for last week, would that be “I duckduckgoed” or “I duckduckwent”?

  • magikmw@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Just googlw it is unfortunate shorthand for “learn it by doing research and troubleshooting”, a skill sadly very scarce. I agree it’s toxic and unhelpful. Guiding people to be better at finding information on their own is the way.