• Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you’re not then you should be looking for another job. Nobody is going to just give you anything, you need to go get it.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Switching jobs can’t counter market power, whenever employers have it, which is probably the vast majority of cases. Unions can.

        • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          People too lazy to find a higher paying job when they’re being underpaid are also likely too lazy to actually organize.

          Unions don’t appear out of thin air. They require a ton of grassroots effort.

          And I have never not gotten at least a 15% pay increase by switching jobs. It’s the most effective way to increase your pay today, even with unions.

          • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            You wanna tell that to my software developer friend who literally cannot find work right now? He worked for facebook and spotify and got laid off.

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      GDP measures the value of the final goods and services produced in the United States (without double counting the intermediate goods and services used up to produce them). So, it doesn’t have a thing to do with your salary

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Workers are the ones that produce the goods and services. We made the economy grow, yet we aren’t the ones that see the direct benefits of this growth. Do you think this is fair?

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think your first two sentences make a good point, but I also don’t think it’s fair to ask the question in your third when all the guy was doing was explaining the definition of GDP rather than making a value judgement about it.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Well yeah, I asked the question to find out their position. It doesn’t read as neutral to me, but I’m biased, so I want to make sure.

        • PugJesus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I mean, more or less. When discussing GDP, you’re discussing things at such a massive scale that only the details of the details filter down. Like the speed of the Earth - obviously it matters, but no one living here is going to notice on their daily walk that the Earth has sped up or slowed down by 100 mph. It’s a tool (ideally) for discerning growth and potential courses of action for large-scale decision-makers, like the government.

          • Poggervania@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            But doesn’t GDP also take into consideration real estate and military spending, two things America very much spends dickloads of money on? In an ideal scenario, it would be an accurate measure, but because housing prices are so high and military spending is basically going infinite at this point in the US, you could argue it’s a worthless metric because of how inflated it can be.