Bluesky Post (this was also posted on twitter)

I was hoping to find a statement from the aggressor, but it seems to be too early.

  • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    I hope this teaches them the valuable lesson of always having domains with more than one registrar.

    Or, hopefully, we migrate to a system more advanced than DNS registrars where your “name” can be taken down by an unrelated third party. The current system sucks and the fact that even the Fediverse relies on it (accounts are tied to domains, making full account migration impossible) makes even the remains of my pre-graduate CS student brain rumble.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    I mean, it sounds like a lawsuit to me.

    1. A takedown request was issued on false grounds.

    2. This takedown was then actioned without any due process.

    3. The issue has caused tangible, and measurable, loss (calculable from prior sales records).

    Honestly, there needs to be a fixed penalty fine for bad takedowns…

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Honestly, there needs to be a fixed penalty fine for bad takedowns…

      Absolutely not, fixed fines become expected costs, and immensely favor monied actors. Make it percentage based so it hurts equally, and rich people actually have to pay a measurable amount.

    • Dasnap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Funko would drag a lawsuit out for years, but Itch might have the spite to push through it.

    • simple@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Takedown requests being spammed everywhere is sort of standard, what’s crazy is that their domain holder immediately honored the request, completely ignoring how massive itch io is with millions of users…

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Probably both if you can make the case for it. Funko for the false request, the registrar for not doing their due diligence in honoring it. Depending on the wording of the law the registrar may be off the hook however, so whether there’s a case to be brought there would be a question for their lawyers.

    • peto (he/him)@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Fixed penalties just become the cost of doing business. Like actors, we need to start asking for percentage of gross.

      • Vespair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Imo we need to start attaching criminal penalties to the people behind businesses that *knowingly *abuse their power and position like this. Corporate bullying isn’t a financial position, it’s a failing of ethics.

        • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          27 days ago

          Yup. The first couple of times might have been a mistake subject to fine. The third time you’re facing criminal contempt of the rule of law.

  • xavier666@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    AI will take our jobs

    AI will create more jobs because there will be dedicated staff who needs to handle the fallout when it does stupid shit

    • Dasnap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Turns out we can solve the unemployment crisis by just creating problems for ourselves! Let’s start throwing eggs at windows to get window cleaners more business.

  • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    It works for me now? Not sure how long ago this was, timewise, but at least they are back on.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    At first I was like “WTF does an indie games site have to do with Funko?” then I Googled it…

    Looks like they hosted a BUNCH of infringing games, so Funko, instead of doing the righteous thing and sending them a takedown request, just nuked the whole domain…

    • nixcamic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      So from what I’ve heard at least some of those are just fan pages that just link to the official site.

    • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Sounds about right for funko lol.
      ( though tbh, listing all games that taken the funko brand would be a massive task lol ).

      Still, this one hell of a messy shit i wouldnt want to touch legally haha

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        though tbh, listing all games that taken the funko brand would be a massive task lol

        That’s what the brandshield “AI” was supposed to automate. Hell, I could possibly cobble some python script to crawl through itch and create a list of infriging games/devs, something that wouldn’t take more than 1 day.

        • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          Sure, but for a lawsuit you should also validate that list to make sure there were no mistakes. Same should have happened with the ai bot. But nooooo, too many people takes scripts and ai output as facts -_-

  • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    Funko? That irrelevant, ugly, shitty, cheap, tacky, terrible brand from the 2010’s that lacks any relevance in 2024?

    Yeah, I know 'em.

    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Leafo

      I’m the one running itch.io, so here’s some more context for you:

      From what can tell, some person made a fan page for an existing Funko Pop video game (Funko Fusion), with links to the official site and Screenshots of the game. The BrandShield software is probably instructed to eradicate all “unauthorized” use of their trademark, so they sent reports independently to our host and registrar claiming there was “fraud and phishing” going on, likely to cause escalation instead of doing the expected DMCA/cease-and-desist. Because of this, I honestly think they’re the malicious actor in all of this. Their website, if you care: https://www.brandshield.com/

      About 5 or 6 days ago, received these reports on our host (Linode) and from our registrar (iwantmyname). I expressed my disappointment in my responses to both of them but told them had removed the page and disabled the account. Linode confirmed and closed the case. iwantmyname never responded. This evening, got a downtime alert, and while debugging, I noticed that the domain status had been set to “serverHold” on iwantmyname’s domain panel. We have no other abuse reports from iwantmyname other than this one. I’m assuming no one on their end “closed” the ticket, so it went into an automatic system to disable the domain after some number of days.

      I’ve been trying to get in touch with them via their abuse and support emails, but no response likely due to the time of day, so decided to “escalate” the issue myself on social media.

      (OCR)

    • girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Good. If a registrar causes issues because of their own non-response during their own investigation then it’s useless.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    I wish to avoid any and all companies which do not have actual customer service, but I don’t know if this is possible without spending a lot of extra money.

    • aquafunkalisticbootywhap@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      unfortunately we’ve entered an era where not wanting to condone/support/endorse/encourage shitty corporate behavior requires the sacrifice of not getting to enjoy most products and conveniences that are available. theyre often enjoyed by many other folks who just shrug and say “everyone else is doing it”

      I find most companies that undercut their competitors’ prices are cutting corners somewhere I don’t want to be involved in. quality and customer service has a price. I try as hard as I can to pay that price, or just do without.

      just try your best, pick your battles; it’s all anyone can do without going insane and/or full modernity-hermit

      (reminds me of the cattle “rancher” in ‘king corn’ who says theyd love to go back to selling grass fed, grass finished beef, but all anyone wants to buy is cheapass, corn sileage-stuffed feed lot crap, so it’s either sell that, or go out of business. producers cant just choose their market; there has to be a demand for it.)