Summary

The FBI is offering a $50,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the gunman who killed UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.

The gunman, who arrived in New York City on November 24th, shot Thompson on December 4th outside a hotel hosting an investor conference.

Investigators believe the gunman, who concealed his identity with a mask, fled the city on a bus, leaving behind a backpack in Central Park.

  • malloc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    5X upgrade in bounty from $10K offered by crime stoppers. Investigation must be drying up. Probably be up to 6 figures by end of month

  • lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    They’d have better chances if they offered the former CEO’s one month’s pay.

      • lath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        I think they’d publicly wave around a vague concept hinting at the potential sum, then if the shooter was caught, they’d really come out and give a $1 reward to a whistleblower if only just to make a mockery of the concept.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          Sounds about right. The peasants do what the rich want because the rich think everyone should do what they say and the peasants think they will get rewarded. Neither is true.

          A $1 reward would just be the punchline.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    If you are desperate for money, you could always shoplift at a corporate chain rather than turning on your fellow man.

    (Edit: Not saying that you should shoplift, but its still better than turning in the perpetrator)

    • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Preferably the one you hate the most. For example Tesco. In my country they as much as doubled the prices without their Clubcard, and they have these “discounts” on almost all products. I haven’t been there as a customer for quite a while. Most likely over a year or two.

      But it’s also a bit personal.
      They schedule inventories in the shop overlapping with the opening times. Now, this isn’t just the mistake of Tesco, but they do decide on the times. What I mean by in-shop is not in the warehouse, but actually where the customers are.
      We are required to be accurate, sort the products on the shelves if there was a mess and face it. This is then checked by someone else. Facing needs to be done well, but slight inaccuracies in counts are accepted (1 or 2 items). Your speed is also measured, by the way.

      This is all OK, except that now there’s customers to fuck with it. They can take items, put them back, or just make a plain old mess. Plus you can’t guard all the shelves. Because of that, I was shocked when I was in Tesco like this for the first time. “If the customer takes something, ask them for barcodes and count of each item they’re taking, write those down on a piece of paper and report them to me.”
      So… you’ll give me a piece of paper, right? RIGHT? (no.)

      Imagine that as a customer. Let’s say you take a few pens and are about to put them into your shopping cart, suddenly someone very much not from Tesco runs up to you “WAIT!! Can I see the items first? I need to write down the barcodes. Is this all you took? Ok. Um… do you… do you have some paper? No? Shit, please wait here, I’ll be right back! (One eternity passes) …”

      THANKFULLY, I avoided that. There were only 2 parents who talked about having to buy some of those plastic book covers ASAP as the school year was just starting, but my scared and startled look, probably/hopefully looking like “Please don’t take those. Please…”, made them change their minds. I’ve heard one of them say something like “It’s busy here, let’s not bother them. We’ll try elsewhere.”

      I assume this discouragers a lot of night-time customers. But I’ll be fair, Billa also schedules such inventories.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      So like, 1% of his annual salary?

      Not even that. He earned $10.2m/year. So $50k would be .49%. Don’t miss the decimal point there. $50k is slightly less than 1/2 of a percent of his annual salary.

      If he never took PTO and worked 5 days a week and 8 hours a day for the entire year (admittedly, CEOs can frequently need to work more than than 40 hours a week) he would be earning $4903/hour. So this $50k bounty offer represents slightly more than 10 hours of what they pay the CEO in salary.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          And he was “just” a millionaire

          This term “millionaire” being synonyms with “rich” really needs to be updated for 2024 with all of the inflation by now. A household that saved $1m by the time they retire at age 65 would technically be “millionaires”. That would give the household $81k/year. $81k/year to spend for a household in retirement isn’t bad, of course, but I don’t think anyone would look at that household and think that the couple living there would be considered “rich”.

          now what about billionaires…

          Now that one is absolutely still “rich” by every measure.

            • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              18 days ago

              Then you’re making more than that millionaire household (remember thats at least two people), and that’s after they’ve spent their entire life working and saving.

              You are twice as “rich” as those millionaires because you’re one person, and likely have decades more to earn increasingly higher salaries and save. For them, its over. That is the most amount of money they have for the rest of their lives. There’s no more income from salaries after retirement.

              • NateSwift@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                18 days ago

                That’s crazy because while livable I wouldn’t call my financial situation super comfortable. Maybe if I wasn’t paying rent though

                • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  17 days ago

                  Housing costs don’t go away when you own a paid-off home. You still have to pay for property taxes and insurance in addition to the costs of upkeep on the home. This is part of the reason its so difficult to get ballot measures passed that rely on property taxes. Fixed income seniors aren’t getting any more money, and they are trying to make their money last for the remainder of their lives (with no idea when exactly they’ll die and it will be okay to be out of money).

                  They also get to watch their savings drop in value over time as inflation chips away at it.

                  All of this happens at a time of life when your medical costs are sky high from your body failing from age or treatment to continually treat chronic conditions.

                  Getting old isn’t for the faint of heart.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    The amount of grief and strife this man caused to countless families through the actions of his corporation are beyond calculation.

    50k won’t even register.