You all remember just a few weeks ago when Sony ripped away a bunch of movies and TV shows people “owned”? This ad is on Amazon. You can’t “own” it on Prime. You can just access it until they lose the license. How can they get away with lying like this?

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The full context of the quote is, while yes, the prospect of the complete elimination of private property is terrifying for some people (even socialists), the idea is that in the future, you won’t need to own anything and your life will be simpler and theoretically more fulfilling if we’re not preoccupied with owning things and keeping up with the Joneses.

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        but you’ll notice that it doesn’t say “we’ll own nothing and be happy”. they’re not willing to take the medicine they prescribe for you. they’re part of the class that’s destined to own everything.

  • beta_tester@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can save up to 77% if you buy now.

    you can never save by buying something. I save if I don’t buy.

  • WashedOver@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like an outsider on these debates. I totally agree we should be able to own forever.

    In my case I find there is so much new TV and movies I rarely go back to re-watch shows or movies so owning them isn’t on my radar. It’s a challenge just to watch a whole series I find.

    I’m wondering how often do people beyond kids re-watch movies and TV shows? Kids seem to be able to rewatch the same movies several times a day…

    • anothermember@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      For me it’s preparing for future nostalgia, I want to be able to just "have it’ to look back on. It may sound strange to some people I guess but I can’t properly get “invested” in a show/movie/game without the knowledge that I’ll be able to rewatch it again, maybe at some point when I’m in my 80s and feel nostalgic about it. It’s a major barrier to my enjoyment in the present. It’s like why people take photos of things. 99% of what I would torrent are things I have access to now, that I would happily pay through the nose for if I could just own it in a DRM-free format.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      While I am the same way with games, there should be a clear distinction between owning something and access to something with clearly defined limitations.

      Some shows I watch once, but I am rewatching Futurama for probably the 20th time or so. Sometimes it is nice to revisit familiar things.

    • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I rewatch movies ALL THE TIME, especially during Christmas and Halloween. There are a couple of other films that I put on consistently as a comfort watch (The Guest, Dread, etc.). I have watched entirely though all 3 Stargate Series at least 3 times each. My wife and I often rewatch Psych and The office. I have watched through all of the Star Trek series at least 4 times each. I am on my 5th or 6th time through Futurama. I have watched Fringe twice at least. Twice through X-Files. I don’t know how many times I have watched Firefly. My wife has been through Friends at least 5 times. And she has watched Murder She Wrote (the entire series) probably 30 times. I have watched Columbo in its entirely no less than 3 times.

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait, you mean I don’t actually own Jason Momoa now? What about my kingdom, do I still own that? (It’s hard to tell, since it’s lost.)

  • ryan@the.coolest.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    🥸 well you see, you own a digital license to watch the movie so long as we have it available, have you read our terms of agreement–

    Agreed that this is scummy marketing, though. The only real way to own media (legally) anymore is through physical copies, and even then maybe there’s some provision that makes a DVD illegal due to license shenanigans… but no cop’s gonna bust down your door for owning an illegal DVD of Aquaman.

  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If they’re saying “own” on their advertisements then they should be required to refund you when they eventually have to take it away. I’m pretty sure “ownership” has a legal definition and it’s probably not too ambiguous.
    It should at least be considered false advertising if they can’t guarantee access permanently.

    • explodicle@local106.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Refunding the sale price is still theft. If it was only worth that much to me (zero surplus), then I wouldn’t have bothered with the trade in the first place. The only things worth buying are worth more to you than the sale price.

      • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh I had never thought of this or come across this concept! That’s a really elegant concept. Of course, in a transaction you’re putting in more effort than the money. The time it takes you to go through the purchase, the research, the cost of opportunity of that money… meaning those have to be covered in the cost of the transaction, and therefore the goods must be cheaper than the perceived value by those amounts.

        You’ve sent me down a rabbit hole and I thank you for that. Now I’m off to read about economics 🤓

        • backgroundcow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Refunding the sale price is still theft.

          What did you lose in this theft?

          Is there really nothing in your home right now you would be sad if someone took and just gave you the money you paid for it?

          Even a digital copy of a movie may not be so easy to replace on the services I have access to.

          Stores are not allowed to go home to people and take back the stuff they sold, even if they refund the price. Neither should a company that advertise “pay this price and own this movie” rather than “pay this price and rent it for an indeterminate time”.

            • backgroundcow@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Especially if the media is readily available elsewhere which is always the case for movies you “bought” digitally.

              Except when they aren’t. Especially if located outside the US, it is far from obvious that a given movie is available through another service.

    • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the best part

      They redefine “own” and “buy” in their TOS

      And so do many many other online retailers that sell digital goods

  • boatsnhos931@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are people really out here buying a media that can only be viewed through an app? If it’s not a file that can be downloaded and viewed elsewhere then I’m definitely not going for it… Who am I kidding? The seas have always been the life for me landlubbers!!

  • SakuraCosmos@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    When they say “Own it now” they mean own it through Amazon Prime. I don’t like it either but legally that is fine.

    • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imagine a book store in which you pay for a book, then the book stays on the shelf in their shop, but they have in database that you can rent it whenever you want from them. How is this ownership?

  • neidu2@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It should be noted that Amazon was among the first to prove that buying isn’t owning a few years ago when a book that many people had legally bought was automatically scrubbed feom devices. The title had been removed from the catalog, and any kindle which held it automatically scrubbed it.

    • MudMan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, you can “buy” stuff in Amazon Prime Video off service. Unlike Netflix or other platforms, they will let you “buy or rent” streaming movies, which is the same as finding the movie on the Amazon storefront and buying the digital copy instead of a physical copy.

      Now, does that mean they won’t yank it? Not really. A digital license is a license, not a purchase. Is the word “buy” or “own” inaccurate? I’m hoping not, because like the Sony thing showed, platforms are desperate to not have the courts improvise what rights they owe the buyers on digital purchases.

      I’m still buying my movies in 4K BluRay, though. And working on ripping all of them for streaming at home, now that I finally have the space.

        • jerb@lemmy.croc.pw
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Look into MakeMKV. It’s “free” while in beta (in practice you need to input a new license key from their forums occasionally, so inconvenient unless you buy a real license) and can rip Blu-Rays with no issue. For ripping 4K, though, you’ll need a drive that supports LibreDrive which bypasses all of the drive’s built-in DRM. I personally use an LG BU40N in a Vantec external enclosure.

      • sleen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s very interesting. But do you always have to buy Blu-ray just to get digital copies? I wonder if there is other options to actually own the movies without the licensing bullshit.

        • MudMan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          So far I don’t know of any services that will just hand you a digital file of a movie outside of physical media.

          I say that’s a damn fine business opportunity, because I’d be all over it, but hey.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        A digital license is a license, not a purchase.

        Stop repeating copyright cartel propaganda.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not digital though. When you bought any physical media you purchased a license to view the content. You never owned the media on the disk cause that is the studios IP.

        • MudMan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If they have access to remove the media from your library on their end, then it’s a license and not a purchase.

          That doesn’t mean they don’t owe you access to it, though. The fact that there isn’t a word for “I’ve acquired perpetual access even if I can’t back up the file itself” doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have the right to continue to access the media. Or to demand that right to be upheld in court, for that matter.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This sort of blatant violation of the First Sale Doctrine shouldn’t even require a lawsuit to stop; the FTC should prosecute companies for it proactively. We need to demand our government start doing its goddamn job again.

  • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I just do the morally correct thing. Buy it, then pirate it so I really do own it forever. Inconvenient from a data storage perspective but the only simple solution I have on hand.