• rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    FDR didn’t have all these obstacles back in the day.

    Yes he did. The difference was that he had to respond in a way that satisfied a militant labor movement without going too far to disrupt the capitalist class. It was a fight up hill the entire way by working class union members.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      The wealth disparity is the same, but the populace and circumstances are a bit different:

      1. There was not a literal fascist propaganda news network brainwashing half the voter base (Fox news)
      2. There wasn’t a significant population which believed any ol conspiracy tossed at them
      3. His political opponents didn’t have a cult, comprised of anti-intellectuals
      4. We didn’t have an enemy state attempting to influence our elections (at least, not nearly on the same level)
      5. Had a serious left-leaning populist political opponent in Huey Long (before his assassination) preaching his Share the Wealth progam.

      I don’t disagree that it was a hard fight for the working class to even get that much, even without those externalities