I am a long term GrapheneOS user and would like to talk about it. r/privacy on the redditland blocks custom OS discussions which I think is very bad for user privacy, and I hope this post will be useful to anyone who are in the hunt for better privacy.

Nowadays smartphones are a much bigger threats to our privacy and Desktop systems, and unfortunately manufacturers has designed them to be locked down devices with no user freedom. You can’t just “install Linux” on most smartphones and it is horrible. And most preloaded systems spy on us like crazy. That was why I specifically bought a pixel and loaded GOS onto it.

According to https://grapheneos.org/features , they start from base AOSP’s latest version, imptoves upon it’s security and significantly hardens it. There’s hardened_malloc to.prevent against exploitation, disabling lots of debugging features, disabling USB-c data, hardening the Linux kernel and system apps etc. They even block accessing the hardware identifiers of the phone so that apps cannot detect whqt phone you’re using. That means with Tor and zero permissions given, apps are anonymous.

Compatibility with apps are best in Custom ROMs but there are still that can’t work, especially if they enforce device integrity. Very few apps usually enforce that tho. Also their community isn’t the friendliest but you can get help. Just don’t try and engage too much or have too many debates.

Anyone else here use GrapheneOS, or any other privacy ROMs? What is your experience? Do you disagree on any point? Let’s have a discussion!

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7か月前

    https://www.privacyguides.org/en/android/distributions/#aosp-derivatives

    https://eylenburg.github.io/android_comparison.htm

    I am a GOS user, it just works, so I don’t really think about it. It’s very nice to have storage and contact scopes.

    My only complaint is I can’t share a VPN over hotspot or tethering, which is very useful for a travel router device (to make all traffic look like it’s coming from the phone). (Lineage and calyxos have this)

  • piyuv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7か月前

    Do you have difficulties running pokemon go (if you do play it) and/or banking apps?

  • Object@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7か月前

    Other than Starbucks app and VoLTE stuff, I haven’t encountered an issue yet. Somehow all my banking apps work. The profile feature alone makes it worth it. They also recently increased the number of profiles that can be run in parallel, too.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7か月前

      How do you like the cross profile notifications? What’s your workflow? Do you have multiple profiles active at the same time?

      • Object@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7か月前

        I have one “Daily” profile where I keep thing I don’t mind showing others, and many other private profiles. Each private profile has a unique environment I find myself using every now and then, so it’s a bit like VMs. For example, one profile has VPN on 24/7, another with Orbot, and another with a non-functional VPN (which is basically no network). It enforces the rule so that I don’t fuck things up by accident. Primary profile is just a package manager for me.

        I have multiple profile active, but it’s usually just for long downloads. It was annoying whenever I go back to a profile expecting some long job to be done, only to find out it got killed 10 seconds after starting it. Or worse, finding out my Daily profile got killed.

        I don’t get many cross profile notifications because I almost never receive one outside of the Daily profile.

          • Object@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7か月前

            Unless the phone is rooted, I don’t think so; I need to enable wireless debugging first, then run Shizuku, then enable a bunch of options in the Pixel IME app. But then again, this can be done permanently with root.

        • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7か月前

          That’s a dealbreaker for me. I do use my phone as a phone rather frequently. What’s the deal? Is VoLTE not supported by default on GOS? Is ou it a specific device incompatibility?

          • Object@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7か月前

            Honestly, not quite sure why it happens, but I know it’s something to do with using it in Korea, where Pixel phones are not natively supported. In other words, it happens with Pixel phones, regardless of the OS.

            As to how I knew it would work with the fix, it was a gamble. I rooted my phone and enabled VoLTE prior to that app.

          • Metz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7か月前

            Is VoLTE not supported by default on GOS?

            Yes and no. e.g. see https://grapheneos.org/usage#carrier-functionality

            Wi-Fi Calling, VoLTE, Visual Voicemail, MMS, SMS, Calling and 5G (SA and NSA) all are supported, however some functionality may not be usable due to Google not supporting carriers on the stock OS officially or due to GrapheneOS not shipping proprietary apps required in order for this functionality to work on some carriers.

            Generally 5G, SMS, MMS, Calls and VoLTE will work fine on GrapheneOS with officially supported carriers by Google.

            Some carriers may restrict functionality, such as VoLTE, on imported Pixel devices as they only whitelist the IMEI ranges of Pixel device SKUs which were sold locally.

            And https://grapheneos.org/usage#lte-only-mode

            VoLTE / VoWi-Fi works on GrapheneOS for most carriers unless they restrict it to carrier phones.

            So… it depends

            If your carrier is official supported by google, your carrier itself supports it and your device is not imported, it is likely to work.

  • Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7か月前

    I was a long time lineageOS user and love the freedom of changing anything. I switched to grapheneOS and like it, but miss some features, that are just pointless and not relatable: no full AMOLED dark mode - the devs said the battery savings between dark and pure dark isn’t relevant. and the other thing is: why is the white bar on the bottom not removable?

    Because of these things I switched back to lineageOS and realised how dumb it is because of two optical features. GOS is definitely worth to look over two missing features and I switched back to GOS.

    Anyway the most interesting transition from an lineage user to an grapheneOS user is, you realise that root isn’t useful and more risk than fun.

    • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7か月前

      Tbh i used OLED dark mode on my LG v50, and I got serious screen burn in as a consequence. OLED isn’t worth using for a smartphone IMO.

    • Darth_Vader__@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7か月前

      Yeah GrapheneOS rarely does eye-candy features. They have a very small team so they exclusively work on security features.

  • Cris16228@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7か月前

    I would love to buy a pixel to install GrapheneOS but ain’t no way I’m giving google money and I don’t know where I can buy a brand new pixel. There are currently 3 apps that scare me and not sure if they’re even working on GOS and one is my bank app

  • Jo K. Wine@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    Svenska
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7か月前

    I’ve been using it for a few months. Very happy with it. Minimalistic initial setup, gives you the feeling of control as well as privacy, bank apps work splendidly… an effortless transition, I say as somebody who previously used iPhone but wasn’t tied into the ecosystem.

  • Yep. Been using it for about 2 years now. So far no issues except amazon prime but they gave me adds sufficiently annoying that i finally got around to setting up jellyfin. Been able to solve pretty much all my issues with dr gpt.

    Every time i see someone posting about a new mobile phone exploit i get immense joy scrolling down through comments and finding someone posting the fact that graphene patched it 3 years ago and recommended a patch to google who have yet to implement it into base android.

  • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7か月前

    I post someone’s comment on a controversial topic about google and GOS. I saved it because that’s exactly how I feel.


    Step 1 of installing GrapheneOS for de-googling your life: Buy a Google Pixel phone

    Look - I know, I know. I get it. Google allows you to unlock the bootloader while maintaining the phone’s unique and excellent hardware security features. The argument makes sense. It is compelling. Other manufacturers do not give you this freedom. I am not arguing about that. I have a Pixel phone running GrapheneOS myself.

    However… It is just so very obviously ironic that one needs to trust Google’s hardware and purchase a Google product to de-google their life through GrapheneOS. I think that it is a perfectly valid position for someone to raise their eyebrows, laugh, and remain skeptical of the concept either because they do not want to support Google at all, or because they simply will not trust Google’s hardware.

    The reason why I think that this is “controversial” is because I have seen multiple instances of someone pointing out the irony, followed by someone getting defensive about it and making use of the technical security arguments in an attempt to patch up the irony.

    https://mander.xyz/comment/15084264

    • brzrd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7か月前

      With the lack of any other viable option, I struggle to see the point of the arguement.

    • bloubz@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7か月前

      I don’t have any answer for the point where you would not trust Google even for the hardware (even though I don’t think there is any risk on the current devices)

      But concerning the “don’t want to support Google” an easier answer is to buy a second-hand Pixel

      • eleitl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7か月前

        The point of not trusting Google hardware is that there is no way to know what hidden function is in there. De-lidding and reversing isn’t practical at current integration density. So, no, I don’t trust the hardware to not contain remoteable backdoors. But it’s a pretty high threat level.

    • Darth_Vader__@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7か月前

      Yeah it’s ironic but what is the alternative? At least we CAN remove Google’s known spyware from the device, and there’s no evidence of firmware level spying. If you get Samsung, or some chinese crap, you can’t remove Google period, and you might get spied by the manufacturer as a cherry on top. There is no way to have a perfect solution, well unless Samsung starts to provide Custom ROM support or something.

        • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7か月前

          Not hardened though. I was heavily considering fairphone but over the back and forth between them discussing with Graphene developers, their hardware is not secure enough yet for graphene to be made for the fairphones. If and when fairphones are on graphene then I will definitely buy them.

          Also, even though I commend their phone, the accessories for earbuds and headphones certainly bring up some questions as to their intentions.

          • Azzu@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7か月前

            It’s because Graphene is not a custom ROM. /e/os is. Graphene is just an OS on top of the ROM, and Fairphone doesn’t update their ROM often enough.

            This is a complete non-issue though if you use a custom ROM like LineageOS or /e/os.

              • Azzu@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7か月前

                This was not given as reason by the devs why graphene is not on Fairphone. The delayed security updates were.

    • Tinkerer@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7か月前

      This is exactly why I don’t have graphene os, the irony of having to support google is too much for me call me paranoid but i also dont trust them with the hardware piece either lol. I’ve been running lineage os without gapps and its honestly great, updates and patches are every few weeks, super stable and awesome.

      • Darth_Vader__@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7か月前

        I assume you’re using it with bootloader unlocked. The issue is somehow some malware injects your phone and roots it, it can just install itself as a system service and just live there and you’ll never know. The security feature that protects against it is disabled once bootloader is unlocked.

        Also I’ve heard that LineageOS has not all security updates present since some firmware updates needs to be provided by the specific manufacturer. For Pixel, Google provides it and GOS uses it.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7か月前

      If your objective is to punish Google, or to have nothing to do with Google. I completely agree with you using a pixel phone just doesn’t make any sense. You shouldn’t do it

      If your objective is to have the most security possible… Then you should install graphene on a Pixel phone.

  • eleitl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7か月前

    I’m on it for a few weeks on my new Pixel 7 a. Looks painless, though I haven’t migrated fully yet. Lineage OS on my old phone and tablet. Waiting for Pixel tablet sale to run GrapheneOS there too.

  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7か月前

    It’s great, but it drains my battery like hell, (with three profiles: default, google-ser-ices and owner… don’t know if that’s still recommended)

  • brownmustardminion@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7か月前

    I’ve been using it for many months and I like it a lot. Only one of my banking apps doesn’t work.

    Currently my main issue is that webauthn stopped working after an update. And the community support hasn’t been helpful.

    I wish they had better documentation in general.

  • snrkl@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7か月前

    I’ve been using it on multiple devices for multiple years.

    It works for me, and every app in want to use works. I’ve found that when they don’t, it almost always is broken on the stock OS also.

    • Forbo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7か月前

      Were you using sandboxed Play Services? Having multiple apps doing their own notification listeners can definitely impact battery, but I’ve not had an issue.