• frazw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Anything which drives nails into the xitter coffin is a good thing as far as I’m concerned. Bluesky may not tick many people’s boxes here on lemmy, but this migration shows that lots of people wanted to leave xitter but didn’t see an option. Threads clearly didn’t attract them, likely due to the owner. I hope it nothing else, Bluesky is a less toxic place and xitter and musk become less relevant. In the long run Bluesky may end up being another head of the hydra , but for now, it’s not, and it may get people used to the idea of federation.

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I hope some of them come to the Fediverse. It’s nice that only the curious ones will come.

  • CoderSupreme@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    It’s venture capital. Eventually it will stop being open source and will enshitify just like every other platform. So nothing is changing long term in my opinion.

    • psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Meaning like the rationalist / effective altruism guys? Would have thought they’d be prone to sticking with Musk

      • IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        The postrat folk. The deep value Silicon Valley folk. Core Techbro kind of people.

        Would have thought they’d be prone to sticking with Musk

        Ditto, but at the same time. Being with daddy Musk might be too traditional at this point. No idea the reasons, but you can to see a lot of this popping up in that circle on Twitter.

        TPOT → Bluesky is actually an interesting example of what looks like a successful transplantation… quasi-existential concerns about Elon Twitter, vibes have been off leading to big cascades of migration tend to happen after inciting incidents (eg twitter banning substack links being a canary in the coal mine)

        You know the “I sound super thoughtful” kind of stuff. Lots of praise from that Group on XTwitter/Bluesky.

        • psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Interesting. As with any problematic group that makes the transition it’s a bit annoying to have to deal with them on the new platform, but they shouldn’t be banned and them moving is a great sign that bluesky has the juice.

          • IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Yeah, something got in their crawl and Bluesky is on low key TPOT rising.

            Someone did a post on it, you can see the map that was done in the picture there with TPOT in blue.

            I don’t know why they started coalescing on Bluesky, but it is what it is. If they get annoying there, I know how to mute them. But as long as that doesn’t also herald the “free speech absolutists” that literally add zero value, I’m cool with TPOT heading to Bluesky.

            Besides, I’m more active on Fedi/Mastodon at this point than Threads/Bluesky so it’s not really a pressing thing for me. I mean shit, I wouldn’t have a problem with Musk’s network if he’d clamp down on the utter trash going on over there. Like it’s gotten to pure garbage, I haven’t the time to block everyone who pops into my feeds that how hard the algo there is pushing the trash.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      On Bluesky anyone who really hates TPOT can make a block list that anyone can subscribe to and you never have to think of it again. You can also easily flag accounts to include on the list.

      If TPOT moved en masse to Mastodon, across many different instances, how would someone achieve the same thing? My understanding is they don’t have any similar feature. As long as “just block them all individually or hope they all move to one shitty instance you can block” is the solution, it’s going to fail to attract people.

        • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          In that case the instance you’re on is basically the block list, right? That’s good, especially if most instances are really dedicated to stamping out that kind of thing. But if/when Mastodon gets big, it becomes a problem of scale.

          In practical terms it’s kind of unrealistic to expect T&S to deal with people because they have garbage takes; most of their day is going to be dealing with the usual internet nightmare sludge, which is where I think block lists become a real utility on the user end of things. In addition to the advantage of just making the blocked users shout into the void when 90% of the site wants nothing to do with their ass, which I can tell you from observation makes them extremely mad.

          • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Anything that requires end users to react to trolls in a reactive way and in a troll by troll basis, and only after the troll has dropped their payload is going to take its toll on vulnerable folk.

            Big popular blocklists that people subscribe to aren’t always the answer, because they also have a history of incidentally impacting marginalised groups, even when they’re trying to protect them.

    • KaRunChiy@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      luckily bluesky has strong moderation tools and community managed block listn, so you can totally limit the voices of those folk

  • WalnutLum@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Bluesky is not great, but it’s at least (for now) a better platform than X and the AT protocol is actually very well written. (For instance having a moderation service separated from the service that provides the posts I think is a hands-down better way to handle it than most ActivityPub servers having their admins handle all incoming and outgoing moderation)

    Bluesky federation is just now getting started so it’ll be interesting to see if it goes anywhere/where it goes.

  • Meltrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Whhhhhhy?

    This is the same thing. This is the exact same type of platform that will eventually go the same way. This is shooting yourself in the foot once, then aiming the shotgun at the other foot and pulling the trigger thinking that the bullet was a fluke the first time.

      • Meltrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Was it though?

        A billionaire buys or funds a privately owned platform and does with it as he pleases, despite the obviously humanitarian route being something different. Have we really never seen that before?

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Because most people switching don’t know (or care) about the fediverse and decentralization. They are regular internet users who just want to get away from the cesspool that is twitter, so they go where other people are going.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Because it shows that a sizable amount of people are at least anti-nazi enough to move platform.

      Yes, it would be nicer if they moved to mastodon, but nobody even knows what that is, nobody is there (classic chicken and egg problem), and people get confused by the whole “choose an instance/server” thing.

      Is it not ok to have a small celebration of people moving to a better, more positive platform, even if it is far from perfect?

  • staticsoar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Shame that it’s another Capital-owned platform taking the spotlight. I’m not surprised unfortunately. We’ll be in the same place we are now in 10 years.

    I’m preaching to the choir, but mastodon is the better platform if you want more authentic community and conversation.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Chances are that any new large commercial platform will enshittify, sooner or later prompting another exodus, and each exodus will at least have some people choosing a community platform.

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    If it was owned by the community that moderated it, then yes. But no it’s owned by another rich asshole.

  • JoYo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    do we really want people that waited until now to even think about an alternative to fascists media?