I appreciate your perspective, but my focus is on enhancing our measurement of community activity; if you have a more effective metric in mind, I’d love to hear it instead of just pointing out flaws.
30k communities and 9M posts per day. I find the number of posts per day very hard to believe. Each community would have an average of 300 posts per day, and most communities are abandoned. Maybe it’s the bot communities that repost all the Reddit posts that inflate the number so high.
I don’t like keeping duplicate files, especially in my main drive where I don’t store media. If I didn’t mind duplicate files, it wouldn’t be an issue.
If the files are literally duplicated (exact same bytes in the files, so matching md5sums) then maybe you could just delete the duplicates and maybe replace them with links.
If it was only a handful of ebooks I’d consider using symlinks but with a large collection that seems daunting, unless there is a simple way to automate that?
Automatically sorting books by category isn’t so easy. Is the metadata any good? Are there categories already? ISBN’s? Even titles and authors? It starts to be kind of a project but you could possibly import MARC records (library metadata) which have some of thatinfo in them, if you can match up the books to library records. I expect that the openlibrary.org API still works but I haven’t used it in ages.
If there’s still no simple way to get the metadata based on the file hashes, I’ll just wait until AI becomes intelligent enough to retrieve the metadata. I’m looking for a solution that doesn’t require manual organization or spending too much time. I’m wondering if there’s a way to extract metadata based on file hashes or any other method that doesn’t involve manual work. Most of the files should have title and author metadata, but some won’t. I’m not in a rush to solve this issue, and I can still find most ebooks by their title without any organization after all.
Yes, they are all media but they are not specific to a single type of media. Today I may want to find a book and tomorrow a song with the same program. So the files can be literature, audio, movies, series, etc.
It isn’t, the open source ones that I now are Llama, Mistral and Grok
Federated Jellyfin sounds like stremio+torrentio, so why not just use that instead?
I doubt it.
I don’t really understand what you mean, but this gave me an idea. I can save the version of the software to a file after applying the patch, and then set up a cron job to check if the new software has a different version. If it does, the cron job will apply the patch and update the file with the new version.
I wouldn’t use it then since I don’t feel as comfortable sharing my bank account as I do sharing a cryptocurrency address.
I believe any other payment method has someone in the middle taking a cut. What would you propose?
Some software that enables users to browse all kinds of content and encourages them to donate to creators using cryptocurrency. This program would automatically distribute payments to verified creators who have provided a cryptocurrency address. This ensures that creators receive their rightful compensation for their work.
At present, I only donate to individual creators who receive funding through platforms like OpenCollective, Patreon, or similar services. I don’t even donate to Lemmy because there are multiple developers, but only one person in charge of receiving and distributing donations and I don’t want to waste time and effort making sure the funds are distributed between everyone involved. I’d instead prefer open-source software that simplifies the process and ensures that everyone receives their fair share.
Great work! I believe my favorite is url blocking. Is that like community and instance blocking? If I don’t want to see posts with links from a domain, can I block them? My biggest issue with Lemmy is that I only see memes and US news. So, anything that lets me see other content without having to block many communities would be nice.
This is the only thing that pops into my head but it’s not all FOSS so it’s probably not what you are looking for.
Oh right I forgot, then I only have to check that the instance federates with the others I want.
I agree, but that might complicate things. How about something like this?
Quality Engagement Score (QES)
QES = (PCM * AVU) / MAU, where:
PCM measures raw activity, while AVU factors in community approval.